 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
aneeshm
|
 |
Indore , Madhya Pradesh
Jul 2001 time: 11:01
|
|
Let me clarify my position on this . I do not support harvesting embryos if they have reached a certain stage of their developement (capable of feeling pain , to take a basic example, ie , having a functioning CNS or brain) . Again , these must be embryos that were headed for the dustbin , like products of abortion . Also , nobody gets paid for them , to discourage conception just for this .
I also have absolutely no qualms about conducting experiments experiments on if the above criteria are met . Also , in no phase of the experiments should be embryo progress further , ie , make the transition from "discarded couple of cells" to "huamn in developement" .
Also , the post was not a troll against religion . It was an expression of my opinion of people who base their agruments on their personal religious beliefs , no matter how sacred or final those beliefs may seem to them . Also , I did not say that you were a person who did so . It was just meant to convey my idea that religion has no place in pure science . Indeed , we have the results of such interference throughout history , and are seeing them now (Vatican saying condoms are useless against HIV , etc) , and they have been uniformly disastrous .
If we want to nitpick about the time when an embryo makes the transition from a few indeterminate cells to a human , I'd leave that to the experts .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
quote:
They can become humans, yes....but the ability to become a thing and BEING that thing are not the same. If you doubt that, take several tons of concrete, glass, and steel, and put them in your back yard.
Do you have a skyscraper?
There is some debate about exactly *when* HUMAN life begins....we don't really know, but we know some places when it doesn't, an in the aforementioned fetuses and embryos....it doesn't.
|
Not a bad analogy, however it fails for a rather deep point. There is a difference between substance and property. Substance things can lose a part and still remain the same entity.
This is the difference between us and a skyscraper. A skyscraper will not grow and develop by itself, it requires people to construct the building. This is different from an unborn child in that the child will grow the same we we all do, with food and shelter.
There is no debate about when human life begins, at least not according to doctors and medical textbooks. They agree that human life begins at conception.
Now, suppose we agreed with your point that no one knows when human life begins. Does this mean that we are allowed to kill something we are not sure is human or not? It's like hunting, you don't pull the trigger until you know your target.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
tinyp3nis
|
 |
compensate this!!
May 2002 time: 07:31
|
|
Yes, that's what it is, a piece of meat to me. You still haven't answered why should I change my attitude towards it. One moment they are separated, next they aren't. They zygote doesn't mind, because it doesn't have any more understanding than the sperm.
What goes to the would be person argument, here the analogy is like this.
It's no different to what people do everyday, prevent people to be born. John likes Mary, but Mary likes Ted and the child will be Teds and Marys child, the creation of John/Mary will never take place, but that is no murder. In life, we have the choice to decide who we have kids with, or not having kids at all. Is that wrong to prevent lives like that(not even talking about abortion now)? The zygote was not wanted, so it went to the carbage.
Tell me why I should keep the zygote alive. Is it suffering? Or are you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|