 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
Duuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
"I don't care what the meaning of the word is, I'm going to give it my own meaning and insist I'm right, and everyone else is wrong..." 
Any other words you want to redefine for your little personal exercise in verbal autoeroticism?
Believe it or not, just because you want to pull a new definition out of your ass, doesn't make that definition valid, except in your own little world, deary.
I'm going a lot farther than with laws of war. For one thing, US law requires that for a foreign national to join the US military, they must be a legal resident of the US and meet all the legal requirements for citizenship, other than waiting period. The oaths for enlisted personnel and for officers are also identical - there is no distinction for citizenship.
That creates a hell of lot more restrctive conditions than apply in the French Foreign Legion, for one example, and the FFL is not a mercenary force. So you can make up whatever little special definitions you want for playing GI Joes in your room, but the real world operates on the standard definitions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
NeOmega
|
 |
Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Feb 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
By definition, someone who swears an oath that "I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;" is not serving merely for wages.
|
Oooh, an oath! It's almost as unshakaeble as a jinx, but not as unshakeable as a curse.
I mean, are you seriously trying to tell me that some Mexican in the Army joined for any other reason THAN MONEY? Are you that F****n delusional?
Wait, lemme guess, they want to fight for the star spangled banner and apple pie right? Eh holmes, The U.S. is in tlubble mahn. We need to stick up for our brothers 'cross the Grande mahn! Yeah, mahn, the constitution.
I mean, if they aren't fighting for money, what do you propose they are fioghting for. Oh, I know, wait, this is better, this is better, They want to Liberate the Iraqi people! Yeah, the Mexicans care deeply about the oppression in Iraq!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by NeOmega
Oooh, an oath! It's almost as unshakaeble as a jinx, but not as unshakeable as a curse.
I mean, are you seriously trying to tell me that some Mexican in the Army joined for any other reason THAN MONEY? Are you that F****n delusional?
|
My, aren't we having a little hissy fit?
Any foreign national has to be a legal resident of the US, eligible for citizenship, prior to enlisting. That means, and I'll say it real slow with little bitty words so it sinks in: They can apply for any job they want and work legally for a lot more than E1 to E4 pay. So, like most other volunteers, they're taking a net pay cut compared to the majority of civilian jobs available to them. If they can't legally work here or they don't live here, they can't join up.
quote:
Wait, lemme guess, they want to fight for the star spangled banner and apple pie right?
|
Se llama "pay de manzana" pinche babosa.
quote:
Eh holmes, The U.S. is in tlubble mahn. We need to stick up for our brothers 'cross the Grande mahn! Yeah, mahn, the constitution.
|
Your level of intelligence speaks for itself.
quote:
I mean, if they aren't fighting for money, what do you propose they are fioghting for. Oh, I know, wait, this is better, this is better, They want to Liberate the Iraqi people! Yeah, the Mexicans care deeply about the oppression in Iraq! |
Probably as much as most Americans. Or I should say "as little."
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Thucydides
|
 |
Screw you guys, I'm going home.
Jan 1970 time: 05:31
|
|
NeOmega, your correct about the military being dependent on mercenaries, but not for the reason you think. Any soldier who enlists puts himself under the UCMJ, therefore he has no choice but to follow the orders of those appointed above him or face going to jail. I personally wish I could decide I'm not being paid enough to quit my job because I'm not being paid enough like in almost any other job, but to do so would land me in jail.
Anyway, you are right though because the military is becoming highly dependent on Contractors to do a great deal of the work, which are obviously mercenaries. They don't have to directly answer to military authority and could and at the worst case can be fired. The military in times past didn't use contractors to a fraction of the extent that they do now.
As for females having different pt standards, that's a tricky issue. Females just aren't designed to be as athletic as males are, yet the military still needs woman to sign up to fill their quotas, so they resolve the issue by barring woman from the most physically demanding mos's and have them fill out most of the support roles. Besides which older people also have different pt requirements, thus if the charge of sexism can be used against the military in this case, so can ageism be used as well. In the end, I think it's up to individual commanders to require higher pt scores and that people are alot more fit then they're required to be to pass a PT test.
As for legal immigrants becoming soldiers, they are actually barred from a good deal of the jobs in the military that require security clearences. Still, it seems to me that the biggest reason a foreign national would want to join the military would be to reduce the waiting period it would take to require becoming a citizen, in which case they would be joining for reasons other then money, thus having other then mercenary intentions by joining.
As for the conundrum of fighting a war you don't believe in, I'm in the exact situation right now. I'm about to go over to Iraq in roughly two month. Yes, I am a pawn and have no say in this war or it's consequences. All I can say is that if I found a way out and left the military, someone else would take have to place. All I can do is go do my job and maybe document what I see if I can, as that's the only way I can maybe contribute anything against the war is to be aware of what's going on, ask questions, learn and pass the knowledge on.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
NeOmega
|
 |
Play Pentagenesis Beta!
Feb 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
quote:
As for the conundrum of fighting a war you don't believe in, I'm in the exact situation right now. I'm about to go over to Iraq in roughly two month. Yes, I am a pawn and have no say in this war or it's consequences. All I can say is that if I found a way out and left the military, someone else would take have to place. All I can do is go do my job and maybe document what I see if I can, as that's the only way I can maybe contribute anything against the war is to be aware of what's going on, ask questions, learn and pass the knowledge on. |
Yes, I live in a military town. After a couple of beers I hear this from a lot of dudes. (Not the majority, but alot) Good Luck.
BTW, doesn' the army have some kind of clause where they can keep you indefinitely in cases of emergency? I mean, if they don't institue the draft, and find themselves short handed, couldn't they conceivably keep you for many more years than you enlisted for?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thucydides
|
 |
Screw you guys, I'm going home.
Jan 1970 time: 05:31
|
|
quote: BTW, doesn' the army have some kind of clause where they can keep you indefinitely in cases of emergency? I mean, if they don't institue the draft, and find themselves short handed, couldn't they conceivably keep you for many more years than you enlisted for? |
Yes, when someone initially signs up for military service they sign up for a total of 8 years, 2-6 being active depending on what you want out of your contract (I signed up for 4 years), and the rest being spent in aninactive reserve. Inactive reserves can be called up to become active in emergencies, but while their inactive all they need is a way to contact you. A bigger problem though is stop loss, which is where they decide not to let you leave on the normal date you leave because of emergency situation, although I believe it's based off the same clause. This happen for certain jobs after 9/11 but has since been rescinded.
Anyway, it appears the Army is actually surpassing it's recruitment and retention goals right now. Whether it's because of the poor economy, a general feeling of patriotism, the new snappy ad campaign, or even a feeling that people are getting to do their job in some cases, for whatever reason the army has avoided so far what seems to happens after every major conflict, a slump in retention and recruitment. If it keeps up for the next 14 months I should have no problem getting out, and once I'm out It's possible but much less likely I'll get dragged back into active duty.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|