 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I have an archer, fighter, cleric, mage, theif and myself (who is worthless)
JOn miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
the archer, fighter, thief have all the xp too, if that tells yuo anything
(but curing spells are nice, and maybe the mage will be nice at some poitn also)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I gave her a Quarter Staff +1 early
but she was only marginally useful, like the current cleric
so I guess I am just hoping that the Cleric will be better later
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
centrifuge
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
So whats generally the best makeup for a party - Ive got 2 fighters, a ranger, a fighter/druid, a thief and a bard?
A mage would be good. The bard is unneeded. A thief and a priest seem to be good. Beyond that do i need 3 warriors? Is 2 enough? and if so, what should get instead of the 3rd warrior? |
Generally I have 2 fighter types, a thief, a cleric, and a couple of mages. The mages, IMHO are the "meat" of the group since their spells can change the outcome of a battle significantly, just keep them protected!!! The cleric is also indispensable, mainly because of the healing spells. In Baldurs gate I'll take a cleric's spells over a druid's anytime.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jamski
|
 |
lol ED&D is officially full PvP LOL
May 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
At the low levels of BG1, mages don't really become that useful. Ok, they can help a bit, but they don't rule. I'd take one, either Edwin, or myself, or dual-class Imoen at level 5. Clerics/Druids, don't leave home without them. At low levels you need the healing. I like Jaheria 'cos she can fight a bit too. Someone who can pick locks and find traps is needed too. Either a PC thief/fighter multiclass, or a multiclass Imoen. There's no lock in the game hard enough that you need a pure thief.
Then fill up with three fighter types : Rangers, paladins, fighters, as you like. Minsc, Kivan & Ajantis are all good and can be found early on. Give Ajantis (for example) a sword and sheild and the gloves of dexterity, and he's to hold the line while the others support with magic and ranged weapons. The 3 fighter types are the ones getting the kills, the others are helping them stay alive.
I use magic to aid my team and disable the enemy. The damage spells aren't that effective.
-Jam
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marid Audran
|
 |
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 2001 time: 22:32
|
|
The question about ideal party composition is as old as D&D itself, and about as tiresome.
2 Warriors (Fighter/Ranger/Paladin), 1 Priest (Cleric/Druid), 1 Thief (preferably multi-classed; a fighter/thief archer works nicely), 1 Wizard (Mage/Specialist Mage), and 1 "Auxillary" character (A Bard or a multi-classed characer) is the most balanced.
I disagree with everyone about bards; I'm quite fond of them. They can pick pockets, absolving your thief from donating points to this ability. They can cast the odd spell, and fight a little (using any weapon and armor up to chainmail). More importantly they can sing that luck-boosting song at any time ("luck" is a flat term encompassing a bonus or penalty to all of one's THACO, damage, AC, morale, and saving throws). Their lore ability is very nice to identify magic items immediately, though it takes a few levels for it build up sufficiently to be useful. Bards aren't a powerplayer class, but were never meant to be.
On low levels the boring fighter types rule the day obviously, but that changes. If you're planning to keep Minsc LOTM, go rescue Dynaheir at the Gnoll Fortress. She's an invoker and will solve your problem of needing a wizard. By 5th level they really start pulling their weight; I wouldn't do without 'em.
If you're not planning on keeping Minsc, you should pick up Edwin or Xan (the elven prisoner from Naskel Mine).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
centrifuge
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jamski
At the low levels of BG1, mages don't really become that useful. |
They get to be more useful after they get their 3rd level spells IMHO. I may be in the minority, but I always try to use mages to their fullest extent. I love magic missiles. It is a mainstay of almost every battle that I fight in these games.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
dual classing works a little differently
it is very powerful, but yuo want to go up a numver of levels in 1 class, before you add the second class
you are spending too much effort in the early game, I made a sucky character (took first set of stats from random generator (my stats are the lowest in the party), made a mage/thief elf, ect), didn't do some stufff in the early game (like grab the two early evil people, I saw them and thought that they planned to kill me so ducked out of the way)
the attack on the gnomes was not bad, I did it before the mies (in fact I am in the middle of the mines I did a lot of outside stuff first (and the couple never left me, I dropped them when I wanted Dynaire))
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
BTW
how many of you have played Baldur's Gate 2?
(With expansion)
not that I am going to begin playing it for a couple of months, I just like thinking about making characters sometimes
I am not sure how dual classing works, I think that I would like to dual class with one of the cool classes first and than 1 (or more) other classes later
I was thinking about first class being wild mage or shapeshifter or Swashbuckler or Kensai
than throwing in some other class
but I don't really know how it would work
I think it would be great to take something 'fighting' after shapeshifter or wild mage (like paladin, fighter, barbarrian, ranger, or monk) or a mage class (or cleric) after swashbuckler or kensai
it might even be cool to do sometihng like Wild Mage/Cleric(Druid)
help me, I don't know 2nd edition (especially as impleemented in BG2) very well
in BG2 can I dual paladins or bards? (I don't think I can in PnP)
what are the limits to dualling?
is it a bad idea to take mage first?
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
also if I was a mage, and dualed into a sorcerer, would the spells stack?
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jamski
|
 |
lol ED&D is officially full PvP LOL
May 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
Sorcs can't dual class. Niether can palys, bards and some combinations with druids and rangers (no druid/clerics for example and no ranger/fighters)
In 3ed and 3.5ed you can multi sorcs with mages and the spells stack. Good if you like LOTS of the low level spells 
Regarding Imoen, dual class her at level 5 thief. Then she can still get to the highest mage level in BG without breaking the XP cap. This is what the devs intended I think. Look at Imoen in BG2, she's a thief dualled to mage. Thiefs REALLY gain from having Invisbility and Luck as spell choices And the spell Strength is PERFECT for Imoen if she wants to backstab someone.
quote: I am not sure how dual classing works, I think that I would like to dual class with one of the cool classes first and than 1 (or more) other classes later
I was thinking about first class being wild mage or shapeshifter or Swashbuckler or Kensai
than throwing in some other class
but I don't really know how it would work |
Always best to take the non-casting=fighting class first. That way you get the full HPs up to level 9 (only 1-3 HPs per level after 9) Also fighters don't improve much after level 13, when they get thier last 1/2 an attack per round. So, either dual at 9 for the max HPs in the fighter class, or 12 for the weapon extra profs or 13 for the extra 1/2 attack. After level 13 fighters are ONLY gaining 3HP and 1 Thac0 per level, and that's not a great reward for 500,000 Exp.
The other cool dual class is to dual to thief, to aim for the high level thief abilities. Again best to start as a fighting class.
Never start with a caster class, and then dual it, because you'll NEVER get the high level spells. Always the other way round, unless you WANT to make your life worse.
quote:
is it a bad idea to take mage first? |
The very worse. You'll end up with a fighter with a few spells, no armour and rubbish HPs.
Oh, monks can't dual class either. And the second class has to be a "pure class" in all cases, so either vanilla mage, fighter, cleric or thief. You'll need 15+ in your original classes primary stat, and 17+ in the primary stat of the new class. Any more Q's?
I AM obsessed with BG1+2 BTW. Ask me anything.
-Jam
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I guess my question is
but I want to play a Wild Mage
(and I know 3.5 fairly well)
I was thinking 18-22 levels of wild mage, than dual (unless I can dual multiple times??)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
how about idea of being shapeshifter first and than changing to fighter
also what about barbarrians
are the only changes allowed to vanilla or in some cases druid/ranger???
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jamski
|
 |
lol ED&D is officially full PvP LOL
May 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
quote: I was thinking 18-22 levels of wild mage, than dual (unless I can dual multiple times??) |
You won't get enough EXP to get the mage levels back. You need to go one level higher in the new class to regain the levels in the old class, so no spells untill you reach level 19-23 in the new class. That could be 3,000,000 EXP!!!!!!!!!!!
quote: 1. what level should my party be at before i go to the Nashkel mines?
2. Does a less intelligent ranger not get healing ability?
3. If an object doesnt say its not identified, does that mean its not magical? |
1. The mines are doable with a level 1-2 party. I'd do the Gnoll fortress first if you have Minsc though. That's on a time limit. A level one party should level up during the mines before the final battles. The mines are not hard.
2. Its wisdom, and only in 3ed. So in the BG games even Minsc gets his spells 
3.) If the r-click info on an item doesn't give you an option to identify, then its not magical. Its easy to tell. Also magic items usually look different to to normal versions.
quote: are the only changes allowed to vanilla or in some cases druid/ranger??? |
Yes, I'm afraid so. You can only have a "kit" on the first class. I'm not sure you can dual barbarians either You can dual :
Fighter
Kensai
Wizard Slayer
Bezerker
Vanilla druids
All clerics
Thief
Assassin
Swashbuckler
Bounty Hunter
Wizards
All specialist mages (but look out for the odd stat requirements like 16 WIS for a necromancer etc)
All these classes can be dualed to cleric, thief, fighter or mage without penalty.
-JAm
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Standup
|
|
Rangers have to reach a certain level to get spells - level 8 i think. The charm animals is an inate ability.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|