 |
|  |
 |
|
DAVOUT
|
 |
AUERSTADT
Jun 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
PLATO
Because I know you can do better, I authorize myself to tell you that you are extremely pretentious. How can you dare and judge, you citizen of a country having a short historical existence, a nation whose first king was crowned a millennia ago? And how can you explain that we are still here, despite the innumerable lost battles, at an honourable rank (I don’t know how rates are determined) enabling us to bother you to a degree bordering hysteria? There are probably some facts that you prefer not to consider for they would not match your comfortable prejudices.
OK, Chirac is not good, but your revered President Bush is not perfect either.
As a nation, we have been what you are, … and you will be what we are, in 800 years ... or sooner.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by laurentius
Well Rossija is at least equally evil! |
Fortunately for the rest of the world we are not.
Attachment: ussr_flag.gif
This has been downloaded 74 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
PLATO

|
 |
Of the occupied South
Dec 2002 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DAVOUT
PLATO
Because I know you can do better, I authorize myself to tell you that you are extremely pretentious. How can you dare and judge, you citizen of a country having a short historical existence, a nation whose first king was crowned a millennia ago? And how can you explain that we are still here, despite the innumerable lost battles, at an honourable rank (I don’t know how rates are determined) enabling us to bother you to a degree bordering hysteria? There are probably some facts that you prefer not to consider for they would not match your comfortable prejudices.
OK, Chirac is not good, but your revered President Bush is not perfect either.
As a nation, we have been what you are, … and you will be what we are, in 800 years ... or sooner. |
You are probably correct. I guess my anger over French duplicity has made me so. I really don't have anything against the French people. In fact, the French posters here are some of the most reasonable and thoughtful posters on the board.
My anger is based in the fact that I had always admired France and considered them one of our strongest allies.
Chirac, I think, is very bad for your people. He seeks to dominate the EU and set up an opposing "pole" to the US. Is this what most French people think?
Sorry for the overbearing tone, I had just woke up and now I've had my coffee!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DAVOUT
|
 |
AUERSTADT
Jun 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
No problem PLATO.
Democracies have always bad politicians except when they are in crisis (or only by accident ). This cannot be avoided because the most capable and honest persons are horrified at the idea to be confused with ordinary politicians. And we are not in crisis.
My compatriots are not, in majority, different from me, and were circonspect regarding sovereignty; so, we did not see, at first, the EU as a US competitor. But the US attitude and the consideration of what the EU, running full speed, could become, has probably stimulated our imagination.
Although the European nations are old, the EU is young, and is in the process of discovering its strenght. We do not look for difficult relations with the US, but more and more we will tell them our thoughs, and our desagreements if necessary. That is what I do and told my children to do. And it is easier with friends, so it should be easy with the Americans.
The current shift is caused by the theory of the unilateral preventive war which is definitely unacceptable for us, and as it is a theory it cannot be solved as most of the problems can be solved by analysis, compromise, adjustments etc. I cant see a negociated satisfactory outcome, untill a new administration adopt another policy.
Does your military primacy automatically embody a political primacy, in a time when China just told you that the two of you could lead the world? You will have to consider seriously this question.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
The list is not important. However, I doubt wether this is really based on who actually helped and how much.
For example, let's take the most striking examples. You have on that list Albania and the former yugoslav republic of macedonia.
What did those countries actually do?
You don't have for example Greece, whose base on suda, crete is where many of your planes got refueled and armed from, under the NATO conventional obligations.
Once again, it simply doesn't make any sense at all.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
And Canada is excluded where I think IIRC they actually offered help.
As said it's your money, and certaintly Albania and what have you need it more than Canada, but it still doesn't make sense IMHO.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Ned, do you, or anyone else, have that list? So that we can compare it with this one?
I find interesting that all one country had to do is say "we support the war on iraq" and then do nothing else whereas countries like Canada which actually helped are not on the list.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|