 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
And you an bet that one of the negotiating points Backer with have with several countries, is what the USA does with captured evidence of sanctions violations. |
Indeed, but don't consider the weight of this negociating item too highly. The worst thing that can happen to the countries whose deals with Saddam will be unveiled (France, Germany and Russia... for some reason, any country involved in the conquest of Iraq will be strangely innocent ) is a very bad PR.
AFAIK, there are no planned sanctions towards those who disrespected the sanctions. Besides, it is difficult to start commercial sanctions on France and Germany, because these countries are more important to international trade as Serbia or Iraq, and because it would open a commercial conflict with the EU as a whole (the EU is one economic zone, it's pretty hard to target only one country in it).
It's surely well known for a long time, in diplomatic spheres, who dealt with Saddam during the sanctions. What the evidence will bring is a more precise account of what has been traded. Not much of a value for a diplomat. The only real threat is to make it public, and to give a PR hit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Of course we dealt with him. We're the world's third weapon exporter after the US and Russia. It's obvious we have clients scattered around the world, and it's obvious we don't only have the nice kids on the block in our shop.
And you know what more incredible? You too!
Your country too had deals with the Saddam regime, if only because you cannot exactly act as if a 30 million inhab country didn't exist for 12 years, especially when it sits on a sea of oil.
To "discover" the deals between France and Saddam's Iraq will be about as interesting as to "discover" that Rumsie went all smiles to Saddam some 15 years ago. It feels dirty, but the whole international diplomacy is dirty.
One of the many reasons France rejected war so adamantly was that the Saddam regime had a huge debt towards us, and we feared his toppling would cancel the debt. In all their postwar handlings with France on the issue, the US and the Iraqi council raised the debt issue, threatening or announcing to cancel it.
There's a very simple reason why this debt is important (even for France, who cancelled many debts in the past). That's because the debt is huge. Before GulfWar1, we sold throngs of missiles and chemicals to Saddam, and even a nuclear reactor! Of course we want the money.
Is it dirty? Definitely, that's clearly nothing to be proud of. But then again, past the moralizing PR, nobody can be proud of anything in Iternational Relations. |
Well said Spiffor. I can't agree more. Basically, as pointed out by Hobbes and repeatedly mentioned by international relations gurus, diplomacy obeys to absolutely no morale.
(BTW, how come your English is so good?)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|