 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TCO
1. A lot of the forces in VietNam were volunteers. |
And a lot of those who weren't were militant black civil rights activists who got shipped off by white draft boards to "keep them out of the way".
quote: 2. It was a noble mission and the carnage that ensued after the North took over (boat people, etc.) just shows how that is true. |
It was a joke. A people had been fighting for years so that they could run their own country, and you lot stepped in on false pretences and supported a corrupt fascist regime. For the Vietnamese this was, and remains, a war of National Liberation.
It's a pity that the nation they finally managed to liberate was a poisoned wreck due to the war. But still, they kicked your ass big time.
quote: 3. We got hated and resented plenty during the Cold War. Everybody likes to ***** about the big brother. |
Well, I suppose the Guatemalans, Nicaraguans, Cubans, Chileans, Argentines who suffered under US imposed fascist regimes for reasons that really had nothing to do with the Cold War might have something to complain about.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lawrence of Arabia
|
 |
of the Gulag Archipelago
Apr 2001 time: 06:32
|
|
quote: Time to post it again:
"American protectionism is the problem!
A December report by the U.S. Agriculture Department estimated that agricultural support in the United States is worth about 21 percent of the country's production value, while it reaches 35 percent in Europe and almost 60 percent in Japan. U.S. tariffs average 12 percent, EU tariffs 30 percent and Japan's almost 50 percent, the report said. The Washington Times January 24, 2003 "
"Ag exports tumble
America's agricultural trade surplus has tumbled from $27 billion to about $12 billion since 1996 while imports have risen 20% and exports have fallen 12%. Modesto Bee 12/09/01"
|
I dont see how this is a reply.
EDIT: Well maybe i do. Lemme see if I get this right.
As a citizen of america, you cannot be help morally responsible for the mistakes of other countries governments. If they do it, and we don't then we have done our job. If we both do it, then we are both equally guilty.
Last edited by Lawrence of Arabia on 30-12-2003 at 05:38
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TCO
Gee thanks for weighing in with that in-depth analysis based on your massive knowledge and personal experience. I don't know what we would do without your shining the single photon of your luminous brilliance on this topic.
Now run off and BS some more third rate essays for your semantics take-home final. |
Mind you, I don't always have the time to write "third rate essays for your semantics take-home final". I see no wrong bringing in resumed point of views. Which, by the way, is defended by many historians. I suggest you read a bit more about the history of your pitiful, beotian people before "weighting in" the brilliant prose of your ad hominem genius.
But I can forgive you anyway. How can I blame you of knowing history only from the winning side, since you're part of it anyway?
So, back to the point. Why did the war last so long, cost so much, and used so many bombs (the Vietnam war is the one in which the most explosives were used in all history, even surpassing WW2)? In my mind that is sufficient to ring a bell and try to find an explanation in history books that don't carry on the official, censored version. If it's not for you, well, too bad, but don't go around telling me how wrong I was to do it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oncle Boris
Mind you, I don't always have the time to write "third rate essays for your semantics take-home final". I see no wrong bringing in resumed point of views. Which, by the way, is defended by many historians. I suggest you read a bit more about the history of your pitiful, beotian people before "weighting in" the brilliant prose of your ad hominem genius.
But I can forgive you anyway. How can I blame you of knowing history only from the winning side, since you're part of it anyway?
So, back to the point. Why did the war last so long, cost so much, and used so many bombs (the Vietnam war is the one in which the most explosives were used in all history, even surpassing WW2)? In my mind that is sufficient to ring a bell and try to find an explanation in history books that don't carry on the official, censored version. If it's not for you, well, too bad, but don't go around telling me how wrong I was to do it. |
You are too clueless. Get some weathering.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|