 |
|
Starfarer
|
|
The endless oceans of Darkness that surround us all...
Jan 2004 time: 05:33
|
|
Is it bad of me to be drawing comparisions between Tarkin's ignominious death after being pretty much shunted to the side and marginalized and Yang's continual demise in every game I play where I'm not him?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Sorry Franky, his style of play just doesn't appeal to me very much. I like to adjust my strategies to whatever faction (or civ-traits in Civ3) I'm playing, and I just don't know how to work his advantages.
That on top of the queasiness I get whenever I think about giving him a try.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
swillwater
|
|
quote: Originally posted by shawnmmcc
Lal is pretty straight foward, and the Spartans are a little tough. Morgan is easy if you play huge maps, but I've never tried him on a small one, that could be rough. |
Just kicked arse with Morgan on small map (but lots of land and mind worms) at transcend difficulty.
I gave in to all extortions until clean reactors; then I prodded buttock.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
It quells drone riots.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Starfarer
|
|
The endless oceans of Darkness that surround us all...
Jan 2004 time: 05:33
|
|
My understanding of Nerve Stapling, based on the effects it generates (A complete lack of ability to rebel) and the in-game descriptions, as well as the in game art and the very name, is this...
It selectively destroys certain neural pathways, those specifically linked to higher reasoning and to individuality, in effect removing from the subject all trace of personality or intelligence, the side effect (and, not coincidentally, the DESIRED effect) of which being that the person is a fanatically loyal (If not particularly intelligent) worker completely incapable of the reasoning, planning, forethought, or so-called "spark of life" necessary to consider rebellion.., I believe it is known as "nerve stapling" because it involves, not unlike certain cosmetic procedures, "pulling" the nerve and "stapling" them into the right places, to prevent the brain from regenerating the lost pathways, in effect, convincing the brain that there was nothing there to regenerate in the first place.
Of course, I am no expert, not being a University Provost and not having grafted half of my body into a sentient computer, but I believe this is a sufficient explanation of the procedure and its results... I also believe it is accomplishable through only slightly post-modern technology. All we'd need to do it today is a more thorough uunderstanding of how, exactly, the brain works and how to not kill the subject in the process.
Ahem.
I'm going back to my killing aliens now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Hydro
|
|
Winfield, IL, USA
Jun 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
As a tried-and-true Gaian, I have to admit (**shudder!**) that I have played the Hive, and that I...liked it. But, my Yang was true to his brighter/higher quotes, pursuing a non-aggressive and benevolent (if authoritarian) rule.
Of the factions, Yang has almost as much 'flavor' as Dee does, for me at least. His mindset is challenging unless you like atrocities and punishment spheres, and think that having the State stomp on the face of humanity forever is a good thing (ala Orwell's 1984).
But, after toying with the good and neutral factions (leaving Miriam and the aliens untried) I find I can go home again: Gaia's Landing.
Hydro
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hydro
|
|
Winfield, IL, USA
Jun 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
FC - militant, yes. The key is how that militancy is expressed, and the desired end of that militancy. In my mind, for Yang it is no holds barred, and nothing is off limits. Planet buster? Sure! Nerve stapling? Of course! Gas attacks? Naturally!
After these types of atrocities have rendered Yang's opponents dead, or safely enslaved, they have a bleak life of unending toil, the subservience of all individuality to Yang's bleak vision for humanity.
That, in the end, is what I object to. I much prefer a leader that strives for ideals that include democracy (of some form), and a society where the individual is recognized as valuable, and where that individual can strive for the betterment of the whole. In Yang's anti-utopia the individual has no more importance than a cell: In other words - none.
I would hate to see the future of humanity to be determined by a future Saddam Hussein, Hitler, Stalin, or Mao. Yang is perfectly frightening since he combines his stark genius with the most horrific features of the aforementioned leaders: ruthlessness and amorality.
A counter argument is that any faction can be portrayed as ruthless and amoral, and I have no doubt that in MP you have to or you die (like a stuck pig). However, the agendas of the factions are illuminating, as are the quotes, in describing means and objectives. By the measure Yang stands out of the original seven, and he is fascinating in a Hannibal Lector sort of way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Starfarer
|
|
The endless oceans of Darkness that surround us all...
Jan 2004 time: 05:33
|
|
hah... now now, Yang considers individuals valuable.
...In the sense that in large numbers they make wonderfultools and are very fun to tyrranize...
Ahem.
*Runs like hell 'fore the Hivers try to kill me*
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|