 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:33
|
|
spiff, ned, et al
There is no standard "Jewish" line on the events of the life of Jesus, at least as far as i know. Many Talmud rabbis refer to him as a sorcerer - apparently trying to reconcile NT miracle stories with the denial that Jesus was Messiah - but those are not legal opinions and have no official force on Jews of that or any later times.
Of coruse Jews do not accept NT as scripture, and so the are in the same position of looking for the "historical Jesus" as any secularist, or any Christian who does not privelege the NT as a historical source.
I would note that there a currently fashionable theory of Jewish history of that period indicates that the Pharisees were NOT the dominant Jewish group of the time, the Sadducees were. This runs counter to both the NT and Josephus (most important Jewish historian writing in the 1st C CE, but an interested party and sometimes unreliable source) . Also Pharisees are not "hypocrites" in the Jewish sources.
Some question about whether Christianity would really have been seen as a major threat at the time. Difficult to ascertain without alternate sources to NT.
There was a theory about the historic Jesus a few years ago seeing Jesus as a political leader of the Jews, which would account for Romans crucifying him. Closer to then current Jewish messianic notions as well. Not sure of current academic status of this theory - certainly many jews still beleive it, i think.
Basically we DONT know what actually happened since there are no good alternate sources to NT, and parsing out historically reliable from the NT is not easy. There are clearly VERY STRONG motives the early christians would have had to blame Jews and thereby absolve the Roman state. I suppose this fact is one Jews tend to reflect on more than secular gentiles do.
However what is of greater concern is the historical resonance of the "upon us and upon our children" line in the history of Jewish-Christian relations, and its relation to antisemitic violence.
I dont know how the film really plays things. Until its more widely released that wont be clear, and reserving comment seems wise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
With regard to the topic, no, I don't think Gibson is a nazi. I find the suggestion that he might be a bit silly to be honest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I haven't seen the movie, but I'd hazard a guess that certain people are being over-sensitive. The fact is that jewish leaders were responsible for Jesus' crucifixion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Caligastia
With regard to the topic, no, I don't think Gibson is a nazi. I find the suggestion that he might be a bit silly to be honest. |
The only one who suggested that Gibson is a Nazi is Gepap, and then, only to try to spark controversy and interest in this thread.
So yes, it is a bit silly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Yes, the movie is based on the New Testament, there's no debate about that; it's not the New Testament that is anti-Semitic.
However, from what I read, it seems as if the Jewish characters--apart from Josh & his buds--are depicted in all the grand old Jewish stereotypes; i.e. beady eyes, hooked noses, greedy, etc. That is where the problem will lie, IF that is indeed the case.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Notice how the very first thing I write in the FIRST POST is "No, he is not, but.."
|
And notice I said you did it to spark interest in this thread. Maybe I should have added "but he renounced it right afterwards", but you certainly intended to spark intrest and controversy with the title. You don't try to suggest someone is a nazi and then promptly refute it ig you don't intend to spark interest and controversy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
And these wild and unfounded accusations of anti-semitism at anyone who criticises Israel or the Jewish religion or particular Jewish people are really beginning to get up my nose.
I'm a person who has in the past publicly stuck up for the NZ Jewish community against real anti-semites (and I probably did myself out of a prospective job by doing so), but this sort of behaviour threatens to devalue such actions.
Judaism, the Jewish people and Israel are not special. They are no more immune to criticism than any other relgion, race or country and they have no right to special consideration from anyone nor a right to accuse every critic of being a racist. |
and who accused Mel Gibson of being a racist? Some individuals did raise concerns about the film (based on a controversial script IIRC), which may be valid - unless youve seen the film, you really dont know.
This is exactly why i was concerned about this thread, and its heading. The implication is once again, "OH Boy, there go those Jews, accusing everyone of antisemitism "
I would suggest criticism of members of a group as group memebrs IS ipso facto bigoted - whether the group is Jews, blacks, Maoris, Christians, whites, gays straights, Arabs, muslims, etc.
Criticism of a religion would be something different, but i find that such criticism coming from people who know very little about the religion, is usually stupid, and quite often comes out of an agenda of bigotry - I see plenty of that in America, where a lot of ignoramuses claim to understand the essential nature of Islam.
Criticism of states is of course proper, whether that state be Israel, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, France, the US. It is not impossible that some or many of those making certain criticsisms of Israel are in fact motivated by anti-semitism, just as some unfair criticisms of black african states are motivated by anti-black racism. Any claim that someone is bigoted should be open to contest, of course, but it should not become unacceptable to call someone a bigot.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
and who accused Mel Gibson of being a racist? Some individuals did raise concerns about the film (based on a controversial script IIRC), which may be valid - unless youve seen the film, you really dont know. |
On CNN someone accused the film of being intentionally anti-semitic. Isn't that enough?
quote: This is exactly why i was concerned about this thread, and its heading. The implication is once again, "OH Boy, there go those Jews, accusing everyone of antisemitism " |
Of course it will because that is increasingly becoming the reality. Frivolous accusations of anti-Semitism threaten to obscure and trivialize the real thing.
quote: I would suggest criticism of members of a group as group memebrs IS ipso facto bigoted - whether the group is Jews, blacks, Maoris, Christians, whites, gays straights, Arabs, muslims, etc. |
But that's not what most people do when they criticise Israel, yet people like Lawrence Summers want to call this antisemitism.
quote: Criticism of a religion would be something different, but i find that such criticism coming from people who know very little about the religion, is usually stupid, and quite often comes out of an agenda of bigotry - I see plenty of that in America, where a lot of ignoramuses claim to understand the essential nature of Islam. |
That's true, but it doesn't mean that it is wrong to criticize a religion.
quote: Criticism of states is of course proper, whether that state be Israel, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, France, the US. It is not impossible that some or many of those making certain criticsisms of Israel are in fact motivated by anti-semitism, just as some unfair criticisms of black african states are motivated by anti-black racism. |
And that is true. In fact it is highly likely that some criticisms of Israel are antisemitic, but that does not mean that all are, but yet I have seen, again and again, attempts to tar all critics with the racist brush.
quote: Any claim that someone is bigoted should be open to contest, of course, but it should not become unacceptable to call someone a bigot. |
I never said that. What I am complaining about is the tendency to call all critics bigots in order to deflect criticism.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|