 |
|  |
 |
|
randomturn
|
|
NYC US
Aug 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
Miller: no chance at all. He is a vain and unpredicatable opportunist and Kerry would never trust him.
Edwards: would certainly take it and may be offered the role. Edwards was looking at an extremely tough Senate fight in NC, where his presidential ambitions were lowering his poppularity. He cannot afford to sit around for 4-8 years as a lawyer and then jump back in. His ONLY chance is to be the veep. However, he may not even be able to carry the Carolinas, so his selection is not slam dunk. Also, he did some things in his trial lawyer days that won't look too good under a microscope.
Graham: a possibility, if it seems like he can bring Fla. He is very popular there. Florida is emerging as the Rep.s version of California: they can't win without it. But if he can't guarantee Florida he won't get it, since he is weird and boring and won't be much help anywhere else.
Breaux: a possibility. Louisiana has strong democrat leanings, and he would certainly carry it, but wouldn't help much elsewhere.
Richardson: a very real possibility, for his ability to carry New Mexico and maybe Arizona as well. If those two states go Dem, the Reps have no chance at all. His hispanic heritage also helps a lot in California and Illinois.
Hilary: 0% chance
regarding the south: you've got to figure Kerry to win WV. It has always been very solidly dem: only Gore's incompetance lost him the state. FL, LA, and Arkansas are also in play. Given the 400,000 jobs lost in the Carolinas, they may be in play if Edwards is the veep.
Other swing states: NH will go Dem this time, as it is increasingly dem anyway from Bostonians and New Yorkers moving up there. It was the only Northeastern state to go for Bush. Ohio and Missouri are big states that went for Bush that have been hit hard on jobs. They will be fiercely contested. Bush's chances without either of those look pretty dim.
Jimmytrick, in general:
With regard to Bush getting 400 electoral college votes, I'll bet you $1,000 right now that doens't happen. Barring the capture of OBL, I'll be amazed if Bush wins at all, given his record on jobs, health care, the defecit, the size and spending of his government, education, the environment, immigration, and his open patronage of corporations and the ultra-wealthy. If there's a blow-out, it's more likely to be against the Reps rather than for them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
debeest
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Veep is usually a dead end job. |
GHW Bush, Nixon, Johnson, Truman, Coolidge....... Not exactly a dead end job.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
I think either Richardson or Graham would swing enough votes to make Kerry the odds-on favorite in November.
Miller? Not gonna happen. Too conservative. Maybe Breaux, but he's not as well known as the other two.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Lieberman as Sec. of State?
Meh. He doesn't exactly fire people up.
But there is one guy people get really excited about--Colin Powell.
Hear me out on this. Powell is what is derisively referring to in many circles as a RINO--Republican in name only. It is one of the worst kept secrets in government that he has been at odds with the rest of the Administration over a number of issues. There has been much speculation of whether he would return for a second term with Bush. However, he might--a very small chance, but a chance all the same--be amenable to serving as Sec. of State under a Democratic admin that would be more likely to share his foreign policy views. Or Sec. of Defense.
I also wouldn't be the least bit shocked to see John McCain offered a high-level cabinet post in a Kerry administration.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by randomturn
Jimmytrick, in general:
With regard to Bush getting 400 electoral college votes, I'll bet you $1,000 right now that doens't happen. Barring the capture of OBL, I'll be amazed if Bush wins at all, given his record on jobs, health care, the defecit, the size and spending of his government, education, the environment, immigration, and his open patronage of corporations and the ultra-wealthy. If there's a blow-out, it's more likely to be against the Reps rather than for them. |
If Kerry is the nominee I put $2,000 on Bush to get 370 or more electoral votes. If Ming agrees to hold the money.
The whole $2k to Ming within 10 days of the nomination.
Game?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Why is jimmytrick handing out free money?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Guynemer
Why is jimmytrick handing out free money? |
We are compassionate conservatives.
I offer one thousand points of light to brighten your day.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
If only I had one thousand points of light to wager.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OzzyKP
|
 |
Rockville, MD
Oct 1999 time: 00:33
|
|
I seriously doubt we'll see Miller. Too conservative to be asked, to conservative to accept.
Richardson is a fantastic suggestion. Bush is gonna be relying heavily on picking up more hispanic voters, if the Dems get a hispanic (though I never would have guessed it if people didn't keep saying it) as Veep, the Dems will totally undercut Bush. Plus strength in southwest swing states would be huge.
Edwards would be good, but I am not confident at all he'd accept the position. I'm amazed he is 50 though, he looks under 40.
Any other popular governors Kerry could tap? Penn's governor maybe? To hopefully get Ohio and WV?
But then again lets examine Bush's choice for Veep in 2000. No one could have predicted that. Dick Cheney was off everyone's radar, and he was from Wyoming. Wyoming as as much a Republican lock as anything. So geography isn't always the reason for a pick. Bush was worried about charges of inexperience, so picked a long standing veteran to strengthen the ticket.
The best way to find out who the Veep will be is to determine some of Kerry's weaknesses. Being from the northeast is just one, but not the only one.
Northeastern
Washington insider
liberal
Little executive experience
elite
hazy policy record over his Senate term
in fact let me repeat "elite" he is winning the primaries now cause he appears presidential, but up against good ol' boy, charismatic Bush, Kerry is gonna get hammered for being a plastic, east coast elite. He may not be robot Al Gore, but he is damn far from Clinton. Bush is gonna paint him as detached from the people, stuck in Washington too long, out of touch with America, etc. This is gonna be Kerry's big weakness, he is gonna need a Veep to address this.
In light of that... I suppose Edwards really is the best choice. Damn, he is screwed if he can't get Edwards, and in a damn nice spot if he does.
Who else compliments his weaknesses?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|