 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yavoon
if the choice is between less ppl and us all living in 150 story apartment buildings like rats scared to consume things because the earth will collapse.
I vote less ppl. |
Ok you are voted out then.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
Ok you are voted out then. |
communism. the ideal that everyone's life should suck.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by yavoon
communism. the ideal that everyone's life should suck. |
Fascism. The idea that we should all go on a killing spree.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
Fascism. The idea that we should all go on a killing spree. |
so fascism is the solution to avoid communism?
(for the slow, the joke is that fascism will kill the excess ppl so we don't need to live like dirt poor communists)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
The proof? |
its pretty generally true(not to say its cause and effect).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Barinthus
|
 |
A Magical Moment...
Jan 2004 time: 21:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
Well, as far as I know, no planet has yet been discovered that is suitable for settlement. |
There's always Chiron 
Yeah, if I could do it I'd ban all SUVs, trucks, hummers, and other vehicles that guzzles gas except for those with exceptional gas per km/mile. If someone can prove there's a need for a such vehicle such as for farming or whatnot, he'd have to apply for a permit to purchase a such vehicle and it'd be expensive. Hummers are popping up everywhere where I live and it's so dismaying. Waste of gas and materials.
Also, the entire populace would be put on birth control. If an individual wish to have a child, again, that person would need to apply for the waiver. That way the State can control the birth rate. Ah it won't happen, at least not today.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Mad Monk
Oddly enough, prosperity = slower population growth. |
How do you know that it is not the other way around?
Slower population growth=prosperity
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
How do you know that it is not the other way around?
Slower population growth=prosperity |
I think its pretty obvious one lagged the other.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DataAeolus
There's always Chiron 
Yeah, if I could do it I'd ban all SUVs, trucks, hummers, and other vehicles that guzzles gas except for those with exceptional gas per km/mile. If someone can prove there's a need for a such vehicle such as for farming or whatnot, he'd have to apply for a permit to purchase a such vehicle and it'd be expensive. Hummers are popping up everywhere where I live and it's so dismaying. Waste of gas and materials.
Also, the entire populace would be put on birth control. If an individual wish to have a child, again, that person would need to apply for the waiver. That way the State can control the birth rate. Ah it won't happen, at least not today. |
I would probably be willing to die to revolt against u. hard to say, depends how slow the changes creep up. but if u tried it now. it'd be gun in the streets time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DataAeolus
Correct. More developed a nation become, more the birth rate drops. The States along with some European nations have ballooning elderly population. In the States, it's a concern because the working force is not large enough to support the social security needs of the elderly population and by the time they become senior citizens themselves, there'll be nothing left in the social security pot for them.
|
almost universally europe is in deeper **** w/ social security than america is. tho its certainly ugly for both.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
I don't understand why people are worried about the lack of future social security, specifically elderly care.
Presently real unemployment in Europe is 25 percent, and elderly care has never been greater than it is now.
It must be that some people are afraid of taking care of the elderly. I wonder why that is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
slower population growth = less prosperity. |
Yet the opposite - higher population growth=more prosperity is not neccesarily true.
There is no direct correlation between population and prosperity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
Yet the opposite - higher population growth=more prosperity is not neccesarily true.
There is no direct correlation between population and prosperity. |
that is a fallacy of cause and effect.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|