 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Actually, I agree with Dinodoc.
How can a military force be construed as humanitarian?
There are groups that could help, but the difficult part is that this is essentially a civil war. Does the US have a responsibility to intervene wherever there occurs a civil war? |
While there was a insurgency going on, things hardly developed like a civil war:
war in factUnfortunitely I have forgotten the names of the Hutu Militia and the president, so I will try without them:
So Rwanda was under the rule of the Hutu, the majority group that had been denied power by the minority Tutsi for decades (Rwanda was hit by ethnica violence before- in the 1970's 250,000 people were killed in ehtnic violence), just like in neighboring Burundi, were a Tutsi gov. lead a nasty counterinsurgency against Hutu forces. In Rwanda the gov. was fighitng against a Tutsi rebel army based out of Uganda. During 1993 the Hutu government began laying down the basics of the genoicde machine- pro-government papers spewed anti-Tutsi propaganda and Hutu militias were formed. then in Aril '94 the president dies in a plane crash (along with the president of Burundi). The very next day, Hutu militians begin closing off all the roads and the radio stattions begin coordinating the bands of killer who begin to hack away not only Tutsis (who are recorgnized if not by looks, also by their ID cards) but Hutu moderates who had not backed the Hutu extremists. The scale and form of the insuing genocide was horrific.
To me, the one single factoid that paint s a good picture of the emensity of the killing- most of the dogs in the country had to be killed-they were multiplying too fast and getting fat of the piles of corpses.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
The triumph of Evil
A PBS documentary on the subject. Good stuff if only for the chronology.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
Sad to say it, DinoDoc is right... America is not the world's policeman. If America is going to become the great liberator, then fine, let's mobilize our manufacturing base, let's conscript all able bodied men and women, and let's pacify the world. 
since we aren't going to do that, it's hypocritical to pretend we're liberators and protectors against human rights violations... |
This was not about liberation, and this was not "just" human rights violations: this was attempted Genocide, which the UN and its members, including the US, were obligated to stop. The spectacle of hundreads of thousands being massacred while people argued and openly said what was going on was not genocide was disgusting.
Great link Richelieu I read Philip Gourevitch's We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed With Our Families . Hard subject to read about.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tis I
|
|
as for sending a large force to central africa, the French managed to send enough to set up Zone Turquoise, a region in which they prevented the Tutsi rebels from operating allowing extremists to escape into Zaire and continue the killing...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
This was not about liberation, and this was not "just" human rights violations: this was attempted Genocide, which the UN and its members, including the US, were obligated to stop. The spectacle of hundreads of thousands being massacred while people argued and openly said what was going on was not genocide was disgusting.
| that's crap... if the US went around playing policeman and attacking every nation that killed tons of people, we would all be conscripts in some massive military-industrial nation because we'd have to kick everyone's ass. Why is the US obligated to stop? And the UN is just a collection of ambassadors, it doesn't have people to enlist... those soldiers come from other countries.
It would be nice if we could have our cake and eat it to (pacifying the world without having to become a military nation)... but that isn't realistic. If it's in our power and doesn't cost too much, sure we should intervene. But I don't give a **** about a million Africans dying like that... not to be insensitive, but **** happens. If it directly threatens us, or doesnt' require a massive commitment and mobilization; then fine, let's do it. But I don't want this country to be some uber-world-police force.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Romanticism is always appealing. It's far from the truth though. I'm saddened to say that today's governments follow Dinodoc's logic. Of course they're not as dumb as he is to say it out loud.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Which is in a way optimistic. Since governments have to actually conveince people that what they do is not for their personal gain (national or corporate) but for humanitarian reasons this means that people more readily accept humane reasons than profiteering/technocratic reasons. This is a good trait. Isn't of course all encompasing for all people but it applies to most.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|