 |
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
And there is of course the problem that if we did encourage more expensive US labor to be used when third world labor could be used, and other first world countries use third world labor, we risk that they get an advantage over us. So what do you guys think, if anything, should be done about this? |
This certainly isn't an issue, since, at least in terms of the software industry, there is no competition, and the US software industry has significant enough market share that they could crush upstarts... not to mention the fact that the major software companies in each of the other first world countries are subsidiaries of US software companies.
Competitiveness is no issue at all in software, this is all a chase for profits, in that case.
As for the argument about it being beneficial in the first place, I'd just mention that there is more to the issue than profit and loss... namely the fact that the dollar still exists after its been paid to the worker.
If you pay a US worker, then its taxed, and spent, in a cycle. This creates more US jobs.
If its paid to a foreign worker... then its effectively lost from the system.
In a system with no competition... the software market and the tech support market (for US businesses,) what sense does it make to outsource, pragmatically? You're typically not only putting one person out of a job... you're putting two or three out, for a reasonably well paid guy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Steel tarriffs aren't what most middle class americans are worried about... it'd be the tech service industry job export...
I'd disagree that nothing can be done about it. I think its entirely feasible to discriminate against the cheap cost-of-living-low-living-standard countries, while having normal (actually improved, since there'd be more trade) relations with our regular trading partners.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by dainbramage20
If this is capitalism. I dont want it. And I dont think 90% of Americans want it. We may have made a huge mistake. Show me to the underground hideout, where the remaining 15 american Socialists gather so I can join.
Im sick of this crap. Kerry is pretty much in favor of outsourcing too, Despite his pre-election rants. And I agree, Bush has got to go unless he stops this now. He has the pulpit to stop it. SO STOP IT
I work for an outsourcing company. We basically manufacture PCB for other companies. But theres rumor a new facility in Malayasia is earmarked in 2005 to begin 'supplementing' what we make |
We need more people who think like this.  
Outsourcing is NOT a problem. The problem is the crappy conditions that people have to work in in the new companies, and other "deregulation" causes.
I think that what should be done is equalize the enviromental regulation, and require decent (not equal, decent) payment. That way, the workers in the new countries will profit more from the move, and we'll be more safe from the industries moving there fore their own sole profit.
Overall, I think that oursourcing is a positive phenomenon, but 1st world workers are bound to become unhappy at some point, so we ( ) will still have a shot, because the real problem is the wrong distribution of wealth.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Where do you live, Az?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whoha
|
 |
The TOC is supposed to be classified guys...
Dec 2001 time: 23:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
Recent as you guys all probably know outsourcing has been more and more prominent. The newest figures show the trade deficit at an all time high of $43 billion. We've seen a recovery for a long time now, but still we are not seeing more jobs recovered. In fact, were it not for people giving up looking for work and public sector hirings, the unemployment rate would have risen significantly. There are now more then 400 companies that have labor done overseas, and it seems more and more fields such as accounting and even law jobs are being exported overseas.
The orthodox economic wisdom would be to simply wait for more job to arrive, that it is good if services that can be done more efficiently abroad are done abroad, and that the excess labor can open up new more productive fields. Still it seems worrying, so quickly after manufacturing jobs fled the country and destroyed many well-paying blue collar jobs, more and more service, white-collar, and technical jobs are being sent abroad. Some economists have posited that with the factors of production being more mobile then ever, that production will simply move more and more to where an absolute advantage can be found; which in more and more cases seems to be the third world.
Still, beyond doing nothing, there hasn't been nearly as many proposed solutions to the problem as mentions of it. And there is of course the problem that if we did encourage more expensive US labor to be used when third world labor could be used, and other first world countries use third world labor, we risk that they get an advantage over us. So what do you guys think, if anything, should be done about this? |
the US needs to do some things that are going to be labelled protectionist in order to right the hideous trade imbalance in general. As far as outsourcing goes, I think the congress is going to pass a law saying that the federal government won't do business with companies that outsource, but I prefer the more direct solution to the problem myself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
So you don't live in the country... and are a socialist, to boot.
Your opinion matters in what way, to the discussion on whether the US should change its own policy to become more protectionist?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vanguard
|
|
Monster Island
Apr 1999 time: 05:34
|
|
Step 1. Value added tax
Step 2. Single Payer Health Care, Eliminate Payroll taxes
Step 3. Enjoy the benefits of free trade
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vanguard
Step 3. Enjoy the benefits of free trade |
In New Delhi?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrBaggins
So you don't live in the country... and are a socialist, to boot.
Your opinion matters in what way, to the discussion on whether the US should change its own policy to become more protectionist? |

a) Outsourcing is an issue in Israel, as well. I can observe the trends going on here, and make my observations about the phenomenon.
b) The fact that I am socialist DOESN'T MAKE ANY OF MY ARGUMENTS WEAKER. That's a known fallacy. Adress the issues at hand, and reply to my arguments. The same is correct about the fact that I don't live in the USA. My arguments aren't made weaker. I will not be the one influencing the politics, since I am not a voter in US politics. But this doesn't mean that my opinion, and/or arguments don't matter. I still can persuade people in the correctness of my opinion, thus influencing the election.
c) This is an open forum. I am free to make my recommendations as to the policies the USA needs to take. I am interested in the problem because I care about the wellbeing of those people, both in the west, and in the developing countries. If you don't like it, well, frankly you can stuff it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
a) Outsourcing is an issue in Israel, as well. I can observe the trends going on here, and make my observations about the phenomenon.
|
You care about, however, your situation in Izrael. What you'd like to achieve isn't the same thing as what works for the US public.
Why should we (as in the US) care if workers in new countries get jobs (that were ours,) or if we don't distribute wealth to other countries?
It seems to me abundantly clear that you're of the opinion that the world deserves to leech off the US.
The world will be much better off with a stronger US, trading with its natural trading partners, rather than leaking service industry jobs to third world nations.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
You can impose new taxes on corporations... since the US has a right to do so, it being an internal matter.
Oh... and you can always reconsider renegotiating NAFTA and WTO membership...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
We need more people who think like this.  
Outsourcing is NOT a problem. The problem is the crappy conditions that people have to work in in the new companies, and other "deregulation" causes.
I think that what should be done is equalize the enviromental regulation, and require decent (not equal, decent) payment. That way, the workers in the new countries will profit more from the move, and we'll be more safe from the industries moving there fore their own sole profit.
|
How do you do that? How do you tell a country like India that it has to pay workers 100 times more than they do now and on top of that invest billions upon billions in environmental equipment that it does not have and cannot expect to have in 100 years?
If the socialists had this kind of magic wand power they seem to have, why don't we simply raise everyone's salary in Israel and the United States to one million per year, which is the equivalent of what you are asking India to do. On top of that, declare as once did King Authur, a new camelot where it rains only on the King's authroization and there is no polution by edict.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|