 |
|
Space05us
|
|
quote: The man needs to be locked in a mental home. |
I dont know if its been said yet in this thread but if he was found guilty by reason of mental defect (insane) he would be sent to a mental hospital. And as soon as his doctor deemed him sane again he'd be back on the street. There's no such thing as an insane asylum anymore, they're "inhumane" or some bs like that.
I think he should either be given 9 life sentences without possibility for parole or the death penelty. Even if he pleads insane, if you cant control yourself enough to stop yourself from killing you dont belong in society.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tattila the Hun
|
 |
Tornio
Oct 2002 time: 07:34
|
|
Put him trough a nuclear reactor without shielding, then to prison without any healthcare.
Cruel? Yup.
Effective? Dunno.
Fair? Absofrigginlutely.
I mean, death is just... death. It's too humane for the likes of his.
Make them suffer. And by suffering, I don't mean no color tv, and no XBox for you. Put him inna hellhole someplace, where, with any luck, he'll spend the rest of his sickness-ridden, yet very, very long life. Life in prison should be life in prison, not 20 years. Forced labour, chaingangs. Human guinea pigs for pharmaseutical companies.
"See this, you would serial killer. This is you in 50 years. Not a pretty sight."
Jeez... He'll propably be fined or something...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Space05us
|
|
quote: I mean, death is just... death. It's too humane for the likes of his.
Make them suffer. And by suffering, I don't mean no color tv, and no XBox for you. Put him inna hellhole someplace, where, with any luck, he'll spend the rest of his sickness-ridden, yet very, very long life. Life in prison should be life in prison, not 20 years. Forced labour, chaingangs. Human guinea pigs for pharmaseutical companies. |
I can understand killing someone for thier crimes but physical torture is too much. How would you feel if you were found guilty of a murder you didnt commit and then were tortured for it? Maybe they'd slowly castrate you and then pull out your teeth and finger nails one by one as slow as possible and then an hour later they find new evidence and it turns out you're innocent. Then what?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
jimmytrick, you miss the point about the DNA evidence.
quote: Also, many have taken the position that there should be a moratorium on the death penalty because DNA testing has proven that the innocent have been convicted. This is actually a reason to continue the use of the death penalty, as it demonstrates that a smaller percentage of the innocent will be convicted in the future. |
The systemic problems in the judicial system of the United States have NOT been dealt with. DNA testing is not a fix, it's the canary in the mine indicating something is profoundly wrong. That is why I talked about prosecutorial accountability. What they can do, and then excuse it simply as a mistake, is frightening.
Read about the various "satanic - child abuse - cult" hysteria cases in the 1980's and 1990's. Read about the Demjanjuk case (Google it) and discover how this man spent almost a decade on death row in Israel because a US prosecutor DELIBERATELY withheld new evidence that came to light when the case was being finalized PROVING he couldn't be that man. Since my wife works with children, I've told her that if a prosecuting attorney ever decided that she was a child molestor (she's not, for any jerks who might want to make snide remarks), by the time we proved her innocence, if we were lucky, even with malpractice insurance, we would be bankrupt.
The system is broken. Nobody wants to fix it, and nobody wants to examine the issue of the best justice money can buy - usually in favor of the state, by the way, though it can favor the individual who is wealthy enough. I'm NOT saying that the guilty don't get convicted, nor that the innocent don't go free. But there are sufficient cases that do NOT end up that way that I, for one, do not have any desire to be on the receiving end of the attention of a prosecuting attorney "accidentally".
Until the systemic and procedural issues that let these miscarraiges of justice occur are dealt with, I will be opposed to the death penalty. Yes, genetic evidence gives me a better chance if the system "oopses" and comes after me (since I am a largely law-abiding citizen - largely since I will go slightly over the speed limit). I still have seen people ground up, and lose several years of their lives, fighting to prove their innocence in prosecutions that never should have been brought.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:34
|
|
Double Post Hunted Down and Eaten
-=Vel=-
Last edited by Velociryx on 17-03-2004 at 03:51
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:34
|
|
You guys know me, and you know full well I'm not advocating wholesale slaughtering of people just becauase they're a bit...odd.
Hell, *I'm* a bit odd....the difference is tho, I don't walk out of my house with the blood of nine victims on my clothes, muttering stuff about being God. My oddness takes far more harmless directions (specifically as in "not causing the lives of others to come to a screeching halt.")
If the guy did it (and from what we've been presented with it seems more than fairly likely that he did), he's a menace. There are, as has been pointed out, numerous ways of dealing with a menace such as this, and if we look at them objectively, there's only one surefire way of seeing that this menace does not do it again.
We can try to rehabilitate him....I dunno about you, but I'm not thinking that'd be too successful. God-complexes are notoriously hard to get around, and I'd imagine that a therapist would spend lots of times spinning his wheels and getting exactly nowhere.
We could lock him up in a mental institution, and that'd work until some good doctor declared him magically cured, wrote a dissertation on the case, sold the rights to ABC so they could make a made-for-TV movie about it, set him free, and six months later we read about his next set of victims. Not exactly a cure-all.
We could lock him up in jail and never set him free....sorta an "out of sight, out of mind" philosophy, except that there's not yet been a prison that couldn't be escaped from, and there's no security system on the planet that absolutely cannot be circumvented. And besides that, yes, there is cost to consider.
If we had infinite resources, by all means, let's take a kinder, gentler approach, but in a society where resources are scarce, and decisions have to be made about how to make most effective use of them, I'd much rather see the dollars that'd be spent keeping this nutball under lock and key, spent elsewhere.
Once we solve all our other societal ills, sure, let's spend some coin keeping our nation's murderous nutballs comfortably tucked away someplace, but as long as there are other, better uses for the money, let's get this guy out of our collective hair once and for all.
These guys, despite some psychologists' claims to the contrary are not...ARE NOT victims. They *create* victims. I vote for pulling their teeth rather permanantly.
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|