 |
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:33
|
|
quote:
it's not that simple. Historically, left denotes a more progressive outlook on things, be it economically or socially.
|
Because the libertarian issues were situationally linked toward to leftist economic policy. Now that is no longer the case, if you will, another dimension has been created. For example, a Stalinist would be very left wing economically, but very totalitarian, which some might consider right wing.
Care to explain?
quote:
The poll is not about what people are, but about what people think they are
|
Hardly, for comparison, peoples views are relative to the other, but since we aren't talking about economics, we must include social issues, hence left, right + liberal or totalitarian. Someone could claim to be a centrist or a liberal but in fact, has faschist elements.
Of course it's easier to abandon this whole discussion and say that someone isn't an "ist" or an "ism" but has instead views that are reflective of oneself, in the artistic sense. That won't make the utilitarians very happy though .
Yes it is. Fiscal policy is left or right. Its silly to say that liberty is on the left and totalitarianism is on the right, when they aren't necessarily related to economics. You can have libertarian communism ("proper" anarchism), and libertarian capitalism (right-wing liberals). Totalitarian communism bears most resemblance to Stalinism.
You could independentally call them left or right but that'll just cause confusion.
The best example of what I'm saying is the thing on politicalcompass.org.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|