 |
|
MalevolentLight
|
|
High Above
Jul 1999 time: 00:24
|
|
Sloww you have never been able to do ****, and you never will. You've been acting like you have all this power since civ2 and you really have none. But you are probably better off in Offtopic since it is obvious you have no game when it comes to civ2.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MalevolentLight
|
|
High Above
Jul 1999 time: 00:24
|
|
Imran having Reagan's image as an avatar is an insult to the Reagan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MalevolentLight
|
|
High Above
Jul 1999 time: 00:24
|
|
I'm not sure who Ted is, and sloww if I remember correctly isn't a Republican? I haven't talked to him in like 3 or 4 years though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zkribbler
|
 |
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Feb 1999 time: 21:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
The Republican Party is a big tent that is tolerant of differing opinions. So I fail to see the point of this thread. |
Dino's got the right idea. While in Europe, the various constituencies each have their own party and Parliments are made of up coalitions, in the U.S., there are only two major parties. To rule, the majority party must put together a coalition internally.
FDR did that brilliantly at the beginning of the Depression, putting together urban liberals, southern Dixiecrats, unions workers, etc. Reagan did it in the early 80's, stripping off the blue collar workers from the Democratic party and adding them to the Wall Street businessmen and the Christian Coalition.
I'm a fairly liberal Democrat, and I've clashed with Imran enough to know that he is the opposite of me on most issues...especially economic ones. He's a Republican.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MalevolentLight
|
|
High Above
Jul 1999 time: 00:24
|
|
Being fiscally conservative and socially liberal is called being a libertarian. And I question how conservative he is fiscally since he thinks Kerry won't spend as much as Bush. I also question where he gets his information from since he hasn't heard how kerry plans to pay for his enormous budget. Also I have always wondered how it is possible to be fiscally conservative and socially liberal when the two are constantly in conflict with each other. You are for less taxes and less spending, yet you are for social programs? How does that one work. The libertarian is but one step removed from the Democrats and it's not a very big step. Hardly worthy of being called a Republican.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|