 |
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
We're talking about the complete elimination of labor, not merely labor saving devices. When humans are no longer involved in the role of production, then our only jobs will be to sell each other stuff, and that too can be handled by machines. So what do we do for money, just move things around? |
Wrong, someone still has to design the machines, repair the machines, install them in the factory, remove them when they are broken, supply the factory lines with goods, etc... Then there are the nonfactory jobs of marketing, distribution, warehousing, sales, accounting, etc... There will be lots of jobs and we are only talking about the continuation of a long line of efficiency improvements.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
someone still has to design the machines, repair the machines, install them in the factory, remove them when they are broken, supply the factory lines with goods, etc... Then there are the nonfactory jobs of marketing, distribution, warehousing, sales, accounting, etc... There will be lots of jobs and we are only talking about the continuation of a long line of efficiency improvements. |
Most likely, yes, though eventually these too could be handled by intelligent-seeming AIs.
But the assumption in the argument was the complete elimation of human labor. In that case, those who don't own any means of production are completely superfluous, and given our current method of handling superfluous people on this planet, they'll likely starve.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
But the assumption in the argument was the complete elimation of human labor. In that case, those who don't own any means of production are completely superfluous, and given our current method of handling superfluous people on this planet, they'll likely starve. |
Even if we assume machines 100% take over production, which is an impossibility, then we still have sales, distribution, accounting, design, and human to human services. That doesn't even count farming, science, engineering, energy production, human to human services, specialty art, handy crafts, or hundreds of other fields. We are in no danger of losing these employment opportunities and since manufacturing efficency is emproving so much we will be able to lower the cost of goods and through taxes provide more help to those few individuals who are displaced by the efficency gains.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
Even if we assume machines 100% take over production, which is an impossibility, then we still have sales, distribution, accounting, design, and human to human services. That doesn't even count farming, science, engineering, energy production, human to human services, specialty art, handy crafts, or hundreds of other fields. We are in no danger of losing these employment opportunities and since manufacturing efficency is emproving so much we will be able to lower the cost of goods and through taxes provide more help to those few individuals who are displaced by the efficency gains. |
You're missing the point - eventually we can replace humans in ANY job with computer programs and robots.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
Even if we assume machines 100% take over production, which is an impossibility, then we still have sales, distribution, accounting, design, and human to human services. That doesn't even count farming, science, engineering, energy production, human to human services, specialty art, handy crafts, or hundreds of other fields. We are in no danger of losing these employment opportunities and since manufacturing efficency is emproving so much we will be able to lower the cost of goods and through taxes provide more help to those few individuals who are displaced by the efficency gains. |
When we learn to develop super fast super specialised AIs that can perform a certain intellectual labor task vastly more efficiently than a human can, a real big chunk of the rest of these jobs will cease to have any use for humans as well.
I agree that current automated capabilities would have to increase by a few orders of magnitutde to accomplish these things but the day in which we can build a machine that can information process as well as the human brain can't be more than a dozen or fewer decades away.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lul Thyme
|
|
Quebec, Canada
Aug 2000 time: 05:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
We're talking about the complete elimination of labor, not merely labor saving devices. When humans are no longer involved in the role of production, then our only jobs will be to sell each other stuff, and that too can be handled by machines. So what do we do for money, just move things around? |
As many people said, ppl will invent or increase the demand of needs that can't be yet done by robots, be it stand up comics, administrators whatever...
Think about it, the amount of jobs done by robots, and the amount of jobs saved since the beggining of time has kept increasing.
Just think about farmers.
One farmer and his tools and robots does what 100 used to do before.
What do the 99 others do?
New jobs that didnt exist, Un secretary general, fiscalist, managin a non profit organization, new age artist...
The same trend will go on.
Robots will take more and more jobs over, people will find more and more new jobs that produce things people didnt even think they needed before....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
axi
|
 |
Athens Greece
Sep 1999 time: 07:20
|
|
P.S.: Of course everybody in the elite will be working. They will just be doing sham jobs, like the borgeois class has been doing for centuries (academics, religion, art, politics, administration, charity, etc). Machines already tend to make work reserved for humans more and more superfluous. in order to replace some of the lost jobs, we create bubble economies around such things as management, marketing, adveritsement, styling, showbiz, journalism, etc, jobs in the service sector that is.
Btw, has anyone read "The end of labor" by Jeremy Rifkin?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|