 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I used opera for 3 years
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
Quality always costs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Solver
|
|
Apolyton Duke Of Something
|
 |
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000 time: 07:35
|
|
I've been an Opera hater since I tried one of the very early versions... and I've even tried a new version, and still hate it. The interface is bloated, too much stuff on screen, and bad font selection. I know I can hide all that stuff, but why bother?
The worst thing is that banner. I don't want any software I use to have a frigging banner. Paying for a web browser seems a ridicilous idea, with quite enough free ones. Cracking Opera, I couldn't be arsed.
Also, I haven't seen anything in Opera that I would like as a feauture and that Firefox or an extension doesn't already do. Finally there's the sentimental reason that I've preferred using Netscape for as long as I've been using the Web - didn't like MSIE version 3, don't like it much still, and Firefox is an improvement on Mozilla, which is technically same good old Netscape.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
This is my entire interface I use to surf. It only has three rows of stuff that aren't the webpage I'm viewing.
So the interface isn't bloated.
And people complain Opera is bloated until they find out everything: the popup blocker, the ad filter, the chat client, RSS reader, mail and usenet client and a host of other things such as mouse gestures and tabbed browsing that you have to extend Firefox with - come in one tiny 3.5 Mb package.
It isn't just good compression, Opera is quick in everyday use, it has to be efficient code behind that.
The only valid argument for Firefox, and it's a good argument, is the price.
Attachment: image1.jpg
This has been downloaded 162 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Solver
|
|
Apolyton Duke Of Something
|
 |
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000 time: 07:35
|
|
quote: And people complain Opera is bloated until they find out everything: the popup blocker, the ad filter, the chat client, RSS reader, mail and usenet client and a host of other things such as mouse gestures and tabbed browsing that you have to extend Firefox with - come in one tiny 3.5 Mb package. |
The anti-popup functions are in Firefox as well, and I am against having everything in one application. I don't want my mail and usenet in the same program, I have a separate one for that. Tabbed browsing is in Firefox by default . Mouse gestures, true, has to be extended, if you want them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Locutus
|
|
ACS CTP1/2 Manager & Civ4 Co-Manager
|
 |
Hengelo, The Netherlands
Nov 1999 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
This is my entire interface I use to surf. It only has three rows of stuff that aren't the webpage I'm viewing. |
Firefox has only 1, see below. That is, with tabbed browsing disabled (it's a standard feature, but I disabled it as tabbed browsing is an abomination, no matter what everyone else says), otherwise it's 2. And from the looks of it, it has more functionality in that one row as well...
Who cares about how much diskspace a browser takes these days, or even how much memory it eats? Even a poorly written browser that's leaking like monsoon rain isn't going to tap more than a tiny fraction of CPU power and memory... And FF definitely isn't such a browser.
quote: The only valid argument for Firefox, and it's a good argument, is the price. |
The thing that made me switch to Firefox after 10 years of being a very satisfied IE customer (yes, I was actually happy with it, or happier than with the competitors anyway), is AdBlock. It rules! Opera's filter.ini doesn't even remotely compare to it.
Another killer feature is the search box: a single box from which you can search with one of over a 1,000 search engines if you want, from Google to Merriam-Webster, from IMDB to Isohunt. Really cleans up your favourites list, I can tell you...
Apart from that, it has everything Opera and IE have (or everything I'll ever use anyway).
Attachment: firefox_compact.jpg
This has been downloaded 154 time(s).
Last edited by Locutus on 02-01-2005 at 22:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
You don't want to get into a pissing contest about customization with Opera 
quote: Originally posted by Locutus
Firefox has only 1, see below. That is, with tabbed browsing disabled (it's a standard feature, but I disabled it as tabbed browsing is an abomination, no matter what everyone else says), otherwise it's 2. And from the looks of it, it has more functionality in that one row as well... |
You mean, it's the same. But can you remove the basic menu in Firefox (File, ..., Help)? You can in Opera.
By the way, I agree that tabbed browsing sucks as a concept.
quote: Who cares about how much diskspace a browser takes these days, or even how much memory it eats? |
Diskspace is not so important, perhaps only as one indication that the software is well written.
But RAM is a big problem, especially with tabbed browsing.
quote: The thing that made me switch to Firefox after 10 years of being a very satisfied IE customer (yes, I was actually happy with it, or happier than with the competitors anyway), is AdBlock. It rules! Opera's filter.ini doesn't even remotely compare to it. |
Could be. I played with filter.ini a little but wasn't very happy with results so I don't use it now. I see Apolyton's adds 
quote: Another killer feature is the search box: a single box from which you can search with one of over a 1,000 search engines if you want, from Google to Merriam-Webster, from IMDB to Isohunt. Really cleans up your favourites list, I can tell you... |
If I want to search Amazon in Opera, I type "z keyword" in the address bar, if I want to search IMDB I type "i keyword", Google is "g keyword" and so on... Opera also has a search box but I have it disabled since this is simpler.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Locutus
|
|
ACS CTP1/2 Manager & Civ4 Co-Manager
|
 |
Hengelo, The Netherlands
Nov 1999 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
You don't want to get into a pissing contest about customization with Opera  |
No, I want a browser that gives me what I want; nothing more, nothing less For me, Firefox works best.
quote: You mean, it's the same. But can you remove the basic menu in Firefox (File, ..., Help)? |
I don't know, actually. But why on earth would I want to? I need those from time to time... (Well, maybe not Help, but all the other ones I do)
quote: By the way, I agree that tabbed browsing sucks as a concept. |
Thank Sid there are some sensible people left in this world 
quote: But RAM is a big problem, especially with tabbed browsing. |
Never noticed any RAM problems with any browser myself (well, the Netscape on my uni's Unix systems runs pretty crappy, but that might be a configuration problem). But of course I don't use tabbed browsing 
quote: Could be. I played with filter.ini a little but wasn't very happy with results so I don't use it now. I see Apolyton's adds  |
I haven't seen any ads whatsoever in days And when I do accidentally encounter an add, it can usually be permanently removed with a single click (two clicks if I'm unlucky).
You really ought to give FireFox + AdBlock a try I can certainly understand if you prefer Opera but you simply must have seen this in action, if only for the sake of it -- it's brilliant! It convinced a deep-rooted conservative IE fanboy like myself to switch to Firefox. That's no small accomplishment, I can assure you 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Solver
|
|
Apolyton Duke Of Something
|
 |
Latvia, Riga
Sep 2000 time: 07:35
|
|
quote: Why not, what's wrong with IE? I know everyone loves to hate MS products, but that doesn't mean they're necessarily all bad. If you don't like tabbed browsing like me, IE + Google toolbar was until recently pretty much on par with all other major browsers... |
I am definitely not a MS hater, but I don't think IE was on par lately. It might be just me, but I tend to see a lot of crashes for IE when it's running on a system that's on for quite some time. It lacks several feautures that I like, most notably tabbed browsing (yes, I do like it), pop-up blocking and a search box - Google toolbar's decent, but it takes an extra row. IE also doesn't have a download manager that can, at the very least, pause and resume a download.
Finally, there are all those IE security holes that allow tons of spyware and sometimes worse stuff to get in. Yes, there are patches, yes, there are options to turn off ActiveX and whatnot, but it is a hassle, while other browsers have always been somewhat more secure with the default settings.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|