 |
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: Without a balanced budget amendment and (as of yet) no dire consequences from running deficits, members of congress are going to continue running on pork barrel politics. Simple as that. Deficit hawks basically cut their own throats if they can't provide for their district. If I had the U.S. treasurary as a credit card, I think it would probably tempt me too.
|
There's nothing wrong with pork. It puts often sorely needed money into local communities.
The only way you can really solve the budget shortfall is to put the axe on the big programs. Don't go for the planktons. Go for the huge, bloated whales. Like the Defense Department is getting a $100B budget increase over the next several years (up to $500B in 2010 or something like that), and the RIDICULOUS $121B top 1% tax cut.
You know why cutting pork won't cut it? This little baby here is from the Citizens Against Government Waste website:
quote: For fiscal 2004, appropriators stuck 10,656 projects in the 13 appropriations bills, an increase of 13 percent over last year’s total of 9,362. In the last two years, the total number of projects has increased 28 percent. The cost of these projects in fiscal 2004 was $22.9 billion |
That actually sounds pretty good for the government. 10,656 useful projects for only $23B. But back to the main point, THE DEFICIT IS OVER $500B. Cutting all the pork in the world will not eliminate the deficit. We must aim for bigger things.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:25
|
|
The truth is the pentagon is one of the worst run institutions ever. You must spend money or they take it away from you so everyone spends like mad so next year they can ask for a bigger budget. Something is fundamentally wrong with that system. Also almost $600 per year (that's the regular $450 billion Bush is asking for plus the projected $150 billion over the next year for Iraq) we are out spending the next 12-15 countries combined. We have something like 60% of the world's defense spending and Bush says he wants more?
There is hundreds of billions of dollars of pork in that budget. Duplicate defense systems we don't need but some senator wants it because it will make jobs in his state, truly massive overhead (like 12-14 layers of middle managers when even the biggest multinationals get by with 4-8), etc...
Why do we need three slightly different new fighters which all perform with in 5% of each other? Why do we need the styker when it can't even do its stated job? Why do we need a $200 billion (Bush's numbers but reality is closer to $350 billion) missile shield which can't hit jack and won't stop jack any way? This is just the tip of the ice burg we could slash and slash and slash and still have money to give soldiers raises.
Last edited by Oerdin on 10-02-2005 at 03:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DRoseDARs

|
 |
"My god, it's full of peas..."
Jul 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
Opps... 
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...wh/bush_ap_poll
quote: Poll: Seniors Key to Slip in Bush Rating
1 hour, 48 minutes ago
By WILL LESTER, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - The public's confidence in President Bush (news - web sites)'s job performance and the nation's direction has slipped in the opening weeks of his second term, particularly among people 50 and older, according to an Associated Press poll.
Adults were evenly divided on Bush's job performance in January, but now 54 percent disapprove and 45 percent approve. The number who think the country is headed down the wrong track increased from 51 percent to 58 percent in the past month.
The survey wasn't all bad for the Bush administration: People are slightly more optimistic about the possibility of a stable, democratic Iraq (news - web sites).
The poll, conducted for the AP by Ipsos-Public Affairs, was taken after the president's State of the Union address and the elections in Iraq and at the start of a heated debate over creating personal Social Security (news - web sites) accounts.
Older Americans, especially those 65 and above, were most responsible for the declining confidence and approval numbers. Middle-aged people between 30 and 50 were about evenly split on Bush's job performance.
"It looks like people are reacting to the State of the Union and plans to change Social Security," said Charles Franklin, a political scientist from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
The AP poll did not ask about Social Security, although only four in 10 in the poll said they approved of Bush's handling of domestic policy in general. And a majority of people disapproved of his handling of the economy.
The AP-Ipsos consumer confidence index found people were less optimistic about the economy generally, a dip that comes after reports of sluggish job gains and increasing interest rates.
"I voted Republican, but it looks like things are going downhill," said Kenny Sproull of Lexington, Ga., who works in construction. "I'm a self-employed contractor and a lot of Mexicans are moving into the state. We can't compete with them price-wise."
Most Republicans were strongly supportive of Bush and his policies.
"I agree with almost everything President Bush says," said Beverly Bowman, a nurse who lives near Phoenix. "I think the Social Security thing has to be fixed."
The poll was a taken at a time that some leaders in both parties have begun to question elements of the president's proposal to change Social Security, said Robert Shapiro, a specialist on polling and politics at Columbia University. During that time, details of Bush's proposed 2006 budget cuts have been emerging.
A bright spot for the administration was increased confidence in the likelihood of a stable, democratic Iraq.
"From what I hear in the news, it sounds like the Iraqis really want it," said Bill Harrer, a nurse's aide in Mason City, Iowa, who considers himself a political independent. "But it's going to take a long time."
Just over four in 10, 42 percent, said they approved of the president's handling of Iraq, while 57 percent disapproved.
Since the elections that were considered fairly successful, insurgent attacks have resumed, killing both Iraqis and U.S. troops.
Many in the public are not getting the full Iraq story, said Republican William Reid of Columbus, Ohio.
Reid watches for newscasts that he says "tell the real story about the good things that are happening over there, about soldiers helping kids and giving them food."
Democrats and Republicans were sharply split on Bush and his policies.
"I'm unhappy with the whole package" of the Bush administration, said Janet Luzzi, a Democrat and a government finance director from Eureka, Calif. "The good news is that we have four more years and then we're done with him."
The poll of 1,000 adults was taken Feb. 7-9 and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
___
On the Net:
Ipsos-Public Affairs site: http://www.ap-ipsosresults.com |
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|