 |
|  |
 |
|
Kidicious
|
 |
Diety of Kidiverse
Mar 2003 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
If people are so pro-choice why does the GOP win? |
Because they put other priorities ahead of abortion
|
A lot of people do that. So why don't the Dems just go ahead and make the switch? No one really votes for pro-choice, except freminists, but there sure are a lot of people who vote pro-life. There are a lot of people who don't vote for the Dems for the simple fact that they think they are feminists.
The Dems are a liability to the left, and the left is a liability to them. There comes a time for alliances to end. As for me, I never liked those shits anyway.
Last edited by Kidicious on 08-02-2005 at 22:34
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Here's another reason why I think Dean is an extremist and not just a militant. During the primaries Dean was the outsider looking to break in to the so-called "Washington Insiders" that controlled the party. He screamed and he screamed bloody murder to his young followers, huffing and puffing about how they were going to storm the gates like some mongol horde.
He ran a pessimistic campaign and ran heavily against the "bureaucrats" in power. He wasn't a major proponent of anything except change. It wasn't like he was a supporter of the Dems, but rather an interloper. |
Demanding party reform - greater grass roots input, accountability for the loser consultants, fewer corporate contributions, putting together a coherent message, and loudly standing up for your beliefs makes you an extremist? In a party as seriously ****ed up as the Democratic Party? That's nonsense.
And he did run on specific issues, largely his VT record - balanced budgets, universal childhood healthcare, etc. That his most contentious idea was party reform hardly means that his platform was amorphous. And the party reform wasn't amorphous either - it was a specific set of proposals, and it has gotten even more specific for the DNC chair campaign.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote:
The NDP aren't part of the picture. They stand less chance than a snowball in hell of ever forming a government.
The Liberals co-opted the Conservative fiscal agenda. They delivered on balanced budgets and tax cuts when the Conservatives floundered. Don't tell me that the Democrats couldn't get traction on the issue of deficits.
The language they used was 'responsible government'. Revolutionary, I know, but it might be worth the risk to propose it to the American electorate. |
That's not what I asked. Do they refer to tax cuts as tax relief?
quote: I can tell you what I hear. I hear rabid critics of the Liberal government. What I hear only a zombie would vote based on.
I don't live in Toronto, but I doubt the Liberals get a free ride there.
Still, they win. |
I very much doubt that right-wing partisan radio stations are as prevalent in Canada as in the states. But, let's assume they are. There's still the matter of massive Republican investment in right-wing think tanks, particularly focusing on language, which doubt is anywhere near as extensive in Canada. Republican Congressmen take classes on language framing. There's just no comparison between the two.
quote: I doubt it comes down to that. I doubt that any from the Liberals or Democrats would ever admit that abortions in the third trimester depended on the mother's health. No, the issue is no restrictions, or Pro Choice 'no matter what', no matter what everyone else thinks about it.
Religion be damned. I am not religious, but the thought of a child who is hours from life outside of the womb being dismembered and destroyed on a whim is disgusting and it cries out for restriction. |
Then you clearly don't understand Democratic politics. In my experience, the vast majority of Democrats support restrictions on abortion in the third trimester, excepting situations endangering the mother's health. In fact, that's the current law in Roe.
quote:
I would say that election results do not back you up. |
How so? Kerry lost principally because he wasn't able to articulate a message. He didn't define his core values, rather had a laundry list of issues which he didn't bother to defend, or connect to a moral basis. That's why the flip-flopper charge stuck so well to him - he was seen as vacuous.
Last edited by Ramo on 09-02-2005 at 03:15
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|