 |
|
smacksim
|
 |
Deputy Chairman of the Council of Lords of Gaia
Feb 2004 time: 00:22
|
|
Smac 2 is in the works. But it'll be 2+ years.
Edit: I'm practicing by b.s. skills. sorry about that.......
But really, it should be in the works. We need it. Can you imagine how great it would be? 3-d graphics, a moddable AI, and custom factions from the get-go. Ah, where is it Brian? Or hire me, then I'll shut up........
Last edited by smacksim on 08-03-2005 at 19:10
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MariOne
|
 |
Erewhon in Neverland
May 1999 time: 06:22
|
|
Hey, after all this time, look who's still posting here.
Hi Googlie!
And lotsa other old names, in other threads I barely recognise 1 in 100 
just droppyng by, but...
quote: Originally posted by Zalek
I agree that SMAC II shouldn't move forward in means of story. It should still be the same with fixed bugs and some changes to make game more balanced. smax is really a great game as it is. |
I don't understand this.
Bugs? What do you mean "bugs"???
Ah, after all this time, you haven't learned yet that they're GAME FEATURES ...
Wait, < looks around > this is Poly... ok, j/k 
Hey, should they release just a patch (sorry, proper name was "enchantment" IIRC ), fixing say 70-80% of the major SMAC/X bugs, I've got so supple with aging that I'd bend as low as to buy it...
After all this was Firaxis policy from the start. 
What? Yes, didn't you know SMAX was SMAC patch #5, and they got you to pay for it?
I know there were new features in SMAX, but that's not what you paid for. If that was the case, then they'd have made available the SMAC patch *included* in SMAX as a free standalone patch (just as like the previous patches), for the SMAC owners who were not interested in paying for just the new SMAX pizzazz. But they didn't, if you wanted the last SMAC patch you had to buy it, and get some new frills with it...
...but I've not come here for old rants.
Actually... hey DS, is CG down??? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
The next Poly Wishlist project: SMAC2. The game'll be announced shortly after C4 is released. Don't they have some secret project they're planning on next after C4? But then I guess they've indicated that one at least wouldn't be SMAC2. If the next project ain't SMAC2, it'll be Colonization2.
The best SMAC2 would indeed be a rewrite of the original SMAC (plus X). It would come with 21 factions out of the box. There would be a scenario to play as linear continuations of Earth nations. Maybe 7 of the factions would be Projenitors, or some of these would be factions of native life forms. The game would be released including a map of Earth in Chiron terrain. Every SMAC+X faction would be in the new game.
Other SMAC2 possibilities: SMEE (Sid Meier's Epsilon Eridani) or SMEI (Sid Meier's Epsilon Indi), where there was a separate ship that left earth, and there would be similar factions and some similar technology, but a completely different world.
SMAC System: A different rewrite, where you colonize more than just Chiron, maybe the rest of the system would be a little different than described in the original SMAC.
SMAC Interstellar: Begin somewhere in the middle of the original SMAC, but change history from there and colonize other systems. Possibly go with just a 20 to 60 light year cube around Earth, or the Local Fluff (about the same size), or the Local Bubble (quite a bit larger). I'd love it if it used what we actually know of actual stars, but I would accept it if it is random but covering approximately the same volume of space.
SMAC the Prequel: an all- progenitor game.
SIM ALPHA CENTAURI: like Sim Earth, plus Sim Life, but on Chiron or covering the whole Alpha Centauri System.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
Another thing about the basic rewrite version, you'd be able to play with anywhere from one to twenty opponents. Or at least up to thirteen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Senethro
|
|
Can you guys really think of more factions? I think before more factions would be possible we would need to make some more Govs/econs/values and make probe/support/morale have a greater effect so that faction diversity remains high.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
If I had ever plugged into the game a faction of my own, it would have been "The Inspired", a cross between the Believers and the University. Both religion and science would be important to them. Maybe a sequel could do two sides to every coin: Two basic scientific factions, two basic religious ones, two basic environmentals, two militaristic ones, two commercial ones. One military faction could focus on technology, like the Spartans seem to have if I remember correctly, and the other could focus on manpower. I agree that new, more complex social engineering should be required, probably starting from scratch. And each faction, or some social engineering choices, could have a monopoly on one unit element, or maybe we'd abandon the unit workshop? Then each faction or some SE choice would simply have a unique unit. Or the main game could be the linear continuations of earth nations. Or we could have subfactions? Maybe borrow from The Political Machine? Or this heresy: the lack of cultural distinction!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
You're probably right. It is one of the main features of the game. I guess people have complained that it didn't work quite right, but that doesn't mean it can't be fixed. I liked it myself. I was just thinking crosspollenation was a good thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Brent
|
|
Yeah, I don't like the idea too much of a game about transcendence, at least not one that people will want a sequel to.
Sid Meier's Chara? sure, but I still like SMEI and SMEE. Hmm... Sid Meier's Upsilon Andromedae... SMUA... kinda resembles the Norwegian word for butter... but I guess there isn't likely to be an earthlike planet there. Then again, that one could be all about space stations...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|