 |
|  |
 |
|
DaShi
|
 |
The Taste of Japan
Sep 2000 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
A statement that makes hardly any sense.
I'm unaware that my 'a-theism' is meant to be a counterpart to religion- you won't find ritual, holy books, deities, invisible beings, houses of worship, holy 'ground', fasting, special forms of attire, invocations, chants or songs. So if someone religious is looking for a counterpart to their religion, they won't find it in atheism, will they ?
You will find a moral code, or a set of ethics that I expect to live by however. And so far, despite the absence of the threat of damnation (eternal or otherwise) or the sudden lightning bolt from the sky, I have yet to launch myself on a criminal career.
Clearly I'm not doing this godlessness thing right. |
But what determines what is right and wrong for you? And what keeps you from doing the wrong thing?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DaShi
|
 |
The Taste of Japan
Sep 2000 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by molly bloom
What makes people who have never met their god or experienced divine retribution from doing the wrong thing or from acting in the right way ?
For instance, I don't steal because mostly I have no need to, but partly because I wouldn't like people to steal from me, and partly because what would I steal and why ?
Reciprocity and respect are surely a great part of anyone's moral code. On the other hand I don't give to charity because I think I'm going to get something back though, I do it out of a mixture of a sense of obligation, sympathy, because I can spare the money, et cetera.
I haven't noticed any strict adherence to codes of morality amongst the god believers around the world, unless you're suggesting that all those prisons are full up of law abiding true believers, wrongly convicted. |
I haven't mentioned religion yet. Besides, I don't believe that religion is necessary in order to have ethics or a moral code. Rather it is a something that allows people to make moral judgements just like you make your own based on a belief system. You don't steal under the assumption that if other people were to commit the same actions as you, you could be harmed. By stealing, you legitimize a social action that may adversely affect you. A religious person may not steal because they also feel such an action would also hurt them (hell, karma, and so on). Both are moral decisions based upon personal beliefs.
There seems to be an assumption in this thread that religious people are less moral because they are religious. Otherwise, what's the point of the current argument?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DaShi
There seems to be an assumption in this thread that religious people are less moral because they are religious. Otherwise, what's the point of the current argument? |
Are you sure that you have read all postings or are you posting from a mirror universe ? There may have been some harsh comments, but they are based upon elok's claims that you can't be a moral/ethic person unless you belive in a god - and if I read elok correct then it's the christian god, otherwise you are just as lost as someone not beliving in gods.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
Yeah, Fezgie is easy meat.
What really bothers me is that common people is as well. Without a blink they accept the most ludicrous things if it is stated that is given by god - for a couple of thousinds years ago, well, then it is understandable, but now ? People should know better.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|