 |
Who is the Definitive Sci-Fi Master???
This poll is closed. |
| Isaac Asimov |
   |
17 |
40.48% |
| Arthur C. Clarke |
   |
10 |
23.81% |
| Some other Shmo |
   |
4 |
9.52% |
| I cant deside its like trying to choose between Matter and Energy! |
   |
7 |
16.67% |
| Monolithic Positronic Xeno Banana |
   |
4 |
9.52% |
| Total: |
42 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
DerSchwarzfalke
|
|
Right. Ask the average American to pick from a list that says "Arthur C. Clarke, Isaac Asimov, and Ursula K. Le Guin" and they will probably give you a befuddled look -- or they would know just Clarke from his TV show, not his literature.
My point stands. If you know science fiction literature, you know Ursula le Guin.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
a lot of people seem to think that Clark and Asimov (and Niven) are SF gods for some obscure reason..
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
I voted for asimov. I've read maybe 3 books by clark.
2001 bore me. the other 2 I can't even remember the names.
Asimov robot, foundation and empire series is superior to most sci-fi. Still, there are books that top his for me.
I have enjoyed numerically more books Heinlein than either of them put together.
On average I enjoy john barnes, l.e. modesitt and orson scott card more.
There are many more.
I've never got around to Ursula.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|