 |
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
No, it's because I have some brains in my head. Lord knows how you've been so brainwashed by the left, but RFK was a loser who, like his brother, is only thought of highly because he was shot. |
Not really.
I will readily admit that he was short on accomplishments, but was well on his way to greatness.
However, in your ignorance, you're totally overlooking the effects he had on organized crime, civil rights, poor people, and not to mention, the Vietnam war. He gave all those areas a voice. He knocked Lyndon Johnson out of office.
It has nothing to do with "left brainwashing." I'd say you're more brainwashed by the right by the whole, "he was shot so nothing he did really matters crap," that comes from the right. Duh.
BRING IT

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:34
|
|

Man, you sound like the Rush Limbaugh show, making alot of generalizations about something you're unsure about, or have only cursory knowledge. The fact about the mob is common knowledge. The amount of hardline prosecutions against the mob is well known.
You're just underestimating him because of his name. Bobby was not taken seriously when he first ran for office because of the exact thing you mentioned. He was shy, and timid, had no voice, but over the course of a few months, found his voice and stood on his own two feet. THe fact that his message was so much different from his brother's shows that. Even at times going against his brother's ideas.
Sorry Siddiqui, I first thought the same as you did, but when I investigated further, and saw the real story, I realized what this man was all about.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:34
|
|
Listen, I'm no fan of LBJ, but one of the big tragedies of American history learning is how much credit the Kennedy brothers get for Civil Rights, while LBJ gets nada, when he was the one who pushed through and signed the Civil Rights Acts of 1964.
The reason LBJ stepped down wasn't because RFK, but it was something which was an inevitability to save the party. LBJ may have been unpopular for Vietnam, but the real reason that he'd never win was the few seconds he took to sign the Civil Rights Act. He was a Texas Democrat, his base of support came from the South, which is why JFK took him as his Veep. As soon as he passed Civil Rights for blacks, that support was gone. Without his base, he'd be dead, against Nixon or whoever else. He realized it and didn't want to see what happened to the Republicans in 1964 happen to the Dems in 1968.
I though LBJ messed up with Vietnam, threw good money after bad in his War on Poverty, and wasn't all that great an executive, but for damn sure he deserves praise for being the impetus behind finally granting substantive Civil Rights to blacks, while sacrificing his own political career (he had to know that there was no way he could survive).
And yet the Kennedy boys get all the praise. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
Edit : wrong thread
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
Einstein
Whashington
Bob Hope
Since this vote tries to take non us citizens into account, I think it's just fair to vote on those that aren't US citizens by birth.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
No, people overestimate him because of the name. They do the same with his brother, who is the most overrated President in history. They think RFK actually DID something about race relations and Vietnam. He didn't do **** except talk about it, which many people in the late 60s were doing, even big time Congressmen. |
Nope. It's a double-edged sword. You're confusing your opinion with the reality of the matter of what happened. You don't give Hillary any credit BECAUSE OF her name. So, it cuts both ways. Back when Kennedy campaigned for Senator, initially he was not taken seriously, precisley because of his name. People called him a "carpetbagger," and he had never stood on his own two feet, and wasn't very good at the political scene at first. But he grew into his own man, and people began to respect him.
On his Presidential campaign, he was able to communicate to working classes, across racial lines, in a way that nobody else could.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Listen, I'm no fan of LBJ, but one of the big tragedies of American history learning is how much credit the Kennedy brothers get for Civil Rights, while LBJ gets nada, when he was the one who pushed through and signed the Civil Rights Acts of 1964.
The reason LBJ stepped down wasn't because RFK, but it was something which was an inevitability to save the party. LBJ may have been unpopular for Vietnam, but the real reason that he'd never win was the few seconds he took to sign the Civil Rights Act. He was a Texas Democrat, his base of support came from the South, which is why JFK took him as his Veep. As soon as he passed Civil Rights for blacks, that support was gone. Without his base, he'd be dead, against Nixon or whoever else. He realized it and didn't want to see what happened to the Republicans in 1964 happen to the Dems in 1968.
I though LBJ messed up with Vietnam, threw good money after bad in his War on Poverty, and wasn't all that great an executive, but for damn sure he deserves praise for being the impetus behind finally granting substantive Civil Rights to blacks, while sacrificing his own political career (he had to know that there was no way he could survive).
And yet the Kennedy boys get all the praise. |
Where do you think the idea started? Kennedy couldn't pass the bill because the guy was DEAD in 1964. duh.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:34
|
|
Johnson even said in his own words he was only continuing Kennedy's work:
quote:
The assassination of John Kennedy in November 1963 left most civil rights leaders grief-stricken. Kennedy had been the first president since Harry Truman to champion equal rights for black Americans, and they knew little about his successor, Lyndon Baines Johnson. Although Johnson had helped engineer the Civil Rights Act of 1957, that had been a mild measure, and no one knew if the Texan would continue Kennedy's call for civil rights or move to placate his fellow southerners.
But on November 27, 1963, addressing the Congress and the nation for the first time as president, Johnson called for passage of the civil rights bill as a monument to the fallen Kennedy. "Let us continue," he declared, promising that "the ideas and the ideals which [Kennedy] so nobly represented must and will be translated into effective action." Moreover, where Kennedy had been sound on principle, Lyndon Johnson was the master of parliamentary procedure, and he used his considerable talents as well as the prestige of the presidency in support of the bill. |
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|