 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Thanks, MtG, I always have to break out my books on the Mexican-American War, as I don't have everything memorized in date order.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Hah, the original war had nothing to do with any "violation" of promises, Odin. It had to do with what we now call "States Rights." Santa Ana changed the constitution from one patterned along the lines of the US to one patterned along the lines of Spain. This reduced Texas from a state to an adiministrative province.
Two Mexican states revolted. Texas and one other. Santa Ana dealth with the other state first, then turned his eyes on Texas. When he was defeated, he conceded Texas independence and the border at the Rio Grande. However, this "treaty" was not approved by the Mexican legislature, prolonging the war until the US ended it. |
If you're talking about the Texan war for independence then actually it was about the abolition of slavery. Santa Anna, a former slave himself, outlawed slavery at which point those states controlled by slave owners revolted.
Last edited by Dr Strangelove on 18-06-2005 at 04:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
MtG, you seem to acknowledge, then, that Polk did offer to buy the California, etc., and to settle the issue of the disputed territory peacefully before the Mexicans invaded. You must think Polk a fool for not preparing for war given the Mexican position that if Texas was annexed there would be war.
As to whether the outcome was a forseeable victory by the US, given our performance in the war of 1812, I don't think our victory was all that assured. |
Tell ya what, Ned. I'll buy your house for $10,000.
Since you're obviously going to sell your house to me, I'm going to send a large group of armed men next door, waiting for you to decide to sell your house to me. You have until next week to sell. And oh, by the way, those people that are already there are the new tenants, I told 'em it was ok to move in a little early.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Perhaps, Dr. Strangelove, the change in status from a state to a province had something to do with the legality of the directive.
Regardless, we get the very same argument time and again from the MtG's of the world that the civil war was about States Rights. But in the case of the Texas revolt, I actually believe the Texans on this point. Most of the Americans entered Texas with Texas a state. This gave them some autonomy from the central government on matters such a slavery. The change in status was a big deal. |
Errrrr...... We're talking about Mexico. I don't think they had the 9th and 10th amendment in their constitution. You can't use US law when discussing politics in Mexico.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|