 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
aneeshm
|
 |
Indore , Madhya Pradesh
Jul 2001 time: 10:51
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mrs. Tuberski
i am talking to my son right now bout his future laptop. he claims they told him he has 30 gigs for personal time on his laptop. He will be able to download instant messaging and Music download called I tunes. And if they are caught downloading bad stuff the laptop will go in lock down mode. Does this sound right to any of yall?? |
Bad stuff as in . . . . . . . ? iTunes if fine ( who pays for it , though ? ) . So is instant messaging . 30 gigs is very adequate ( we manage in under 50 megs ) .
And how the "bad stuff" is monitored is also important . Does bittorrent come under "bad stuff" ? Do other p2p protocols come under it ?
Imagine that your son goes does a google search for something , and one of the results is a hoax ( the infamous "whitehouse.com" thing , for example ) , and he opens it , only to find that a hundred little popups have opened up , all containing adverts for gay/lesbian porn , and the monitoring software chooses that very instant to snap a screenshot , before he can close the windows .
What happens then ?
Or another example . Imagine he installs Firefox/Opera ( is he allowed to do that ? ) , and has a clear history policy of five days ( automatically clears history every five days ) . Now he turns in the laptop for whatever checkup the school mandates . They find that , instead of using the broser provided with their policies , he has gone and used another one , thus nullifying the effect of their monitoring software . Can they now claim that because he tried to circumvent their software , he is liable to be punished ?
Or another nightmare scenario . Imagine that he has downloaded some encryption software which is freely available ( say , GPG ) , and encrypted some files . Now does the presence of encryption software and encrypted files make him suspect of something ? ( In a recent case , the presence of encryption software on the accused's computer was said to be relevnt to the case , so this is not as implausible as it sounds , as a legal precedent has been set . )
We need more specifics ( the best would be a copy of the agreement that you/your ward has to sign ) to judge this thing .
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|