 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:21
|
|
"6 billion chinese finger traps."-Gen Ludd
"In a few more hundred years i'm sure will see the complete destruction of the rain forest, the complete melting of the Ice sheets in the antartic, world wide flooding, breaking of the atlantic conveyor system that keeps western europe warmer than it should be and the midwest of USA+ the Carabbean cooler than it would be."-child of Thor
While this might knock back the population, I can't see it wiping us out, or even close. The population would decrease to the point at which it can be sustained by the decreased recources.
"I think it's unlikely that anything named in this thread (except perhaps a meteor) could wipe out humans. What could happen is that the human population could easily be reduced greatly (to say, a few thousand or something). Then smaller, could potentially finish the job."-civman2000
A progressive jackpot where the prizes get really BIG! Sounds reasonable. However unlikely. The remnants of humanity would be spread around pretty good. The "local catastrophes" would have to occur all at once, as people would continue to breed and fill in the areas of past catastrophes. For example, a thousand years after Yellowstone blows, it would be prime real estate again.
"Ming!!"-child of Thor
I said exterminate mankind, not the OT.
"Looking for something to do during downtime at work, Lancer?"-JT
Work is such a bummer, it might not be a bad idea. 
Gepap, I'm getting to the point where I agree with you regarding mankind's ability to destroy itself. Partly because your pov seems reasonable, partly because of wishful thinking.
"Mankind is the cancer of the universe."-Alex
I was thinking more along the lines of an infestation of some all consuming insect, and I'm looking for a good exterminator. 
"A full-throttle Yellowstone explosion might not entirely wipe us out, but could well reduce our population to levels where subsequent inbreeding would leave us subtly different as a species. Whether we'd still be "human" would be a moot point."-Laz
I think in this case one could find an example of the future of humanity living in trailer parks today.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Commy
|
 |
St. Louis, MO, USA
Mar 2004 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
What population expansion? World population is projected to decline by 2050. |
Doubt that, UN estimates population at 2050 to be between 7 and 12 billion...
On the other hand, I guess since you said after 2050, we could start declining, but with 12 billion people, would it really matter?
Anyway, I'm thinking, with our current technology, no naturally created virus could take us down completely, however, a synthetic one might stand a chance, but doubt it...
Global warming could have bad effects, but I think all it'd do is hinder our progression and econmy...
A big asteroid probably wouldn't do it either...we would mostly likely see it before it hits, probably by a few months...enough time to build bunkers, or launch nukes at it...
If aliens landed, we'd most likely win, even if they had superior technology...the fact is, if aliens attacked us, it's most likely that they want our resources...unless the resources include metals and rock, it would be difficult for them to attack us AND preserve the resources they want (food, human hosts, whatever)...unless they slowly took us down by giving us longevity vaccines that make us infertile (an "unknown" side affect), any other method would most likely result in failure...
Really, thought, the odds of earth being created as it is in the first place is one out of about a trillion billion million trillion...add on the 1 in a million chance of us killing ourselves, I don't see it happening...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:21
|
|
seriously, nothing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Whaleboy
N.B. At the current rate of population expansion and climate change, the human race is doomed to extinction sooner rather than later, by one method or another. |
Can you think of any species that has ever been driven to extinction due to it's population expansion?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Mass Driver weapons.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sn00py
|
 |
From New Zealand
Aug 2001 time: 13:21
|
|
If you look at those Earth photos from Nasa or wherever, you will notice that not even 5% of the earth is "taken" by Humans.
I'm talking about things that kill the land, such as buildings and roads.
Irrigation can't be that bad, imagine if we took all the irrigations out, what would be there? That's right, natural vegetation, which would also require water. So it makes little to no difference.
Putting all this aside, I believe that humans aren't actually in control of what is happening within us and around us; we just think we are, I believe that what is actually driving everything that happens (including every little thing each and everyone of us does) is controlled by evolution/existence in motion.
I don't believe that life knows how to destroy itself, it only knows how to survive and if killing off a species is required to make the "whole of life" stronger and bigger, then so be it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zkribbler
I think Whaleboy is saying: increased population --> increased greenhouse gases --> irreversible climate changes --> extinction. |
People seriously underestimate the amount of greenhouse change that would apparently be needed to trigger a run away venus style global autoclaving of the earth. There's plenty of evidence that on multiple occasions of Earth's history enormous injections of CO2 have seriously turbocharged some runaway greenhouse effects and yet in no case did it trigger the runaway feedback loop that would somehow need to occur for globabl warming to have a snowballs chance in hell of causing human extinction.
Global warming will probably shake things up enough that practically everybody on earth will condemn those who allowed it to oocur, but there doesn't seem to be the slightest shred of reason to believe that all it takes is a trebling of earths historically very modest CO2 levels to cause a totally unprecedented effect on the earth's climate.
There has to be a reason venus' history wasn't ever repeated on earth and it's probably a very robust counter feedback mechanism of some sort. Perhaps when loading of the atmosphere with massive water vapor occurs (which is essential to have any sort of venus greenhouse effect), planets at about earths distance from the Sun experience massive glaciation at the poles or something similer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by General Ludd
Wasn't there a number of mass-extinctions in earth's history caused by exactly that? |
I'd certainly like to read about any such extinctions
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:21
|
|
Dodo birds?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Dr. Strangelove - it would require aliens with mass driver weapons, otherwise the humans using them survive.
Now that is one scenario that has been bandied about, which is less likely now but could, with nuclear proliferation, return. That's the surprise asteroid strike that cause a widespread nuclear exchange. Between the two you might just drop hunmanity to isolated pockets without enough genetic diversity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
The disease in question is in Iceland and Greenland. It is highly fatal. HIV is not always fatal either. It has a 90% plus fatality rate, but there is enough survivability that we will make it. Humanity survived Syphlis, which is broadly similiar - highly communuicable (more so than AIDS but for a shorter window), highly lethal with an extremely delayed incubation period.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|