|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Reference what ARO said, ritualistic cannibalism is not only commen, but in most cases it is considered to be honoring the dead. In all cases I know of, when Christian Europeans came upon that practice, they labeled the individuals as savages, evil, degenerate et al (or is that eat all ) and made the practice illegal. Their excuse was that is was a case of their views on morality were universal, and therefore they had the right to interfere and correct the immoral acts of the savages. I suspect that is why I got an interference rating of zero, history is replete with cases where things like this happened, even when the so-called moral individuals were engaged in pretty horrific acts. As a measure of whether somebody is being a hippocrit - "But that's different." My gold standard.
|