 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
Another tyrant dies. Good job. |
BASICALLY, yeah.
His son is a moderate my ass. His son allows the oppresion of woman to go on under his nose besides all the ties to terrorism we can't proove, THAT alone is enough.
May the new king's reign be short.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:37
|
|
GePap likes fascists and nazis.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:37
|
|
I don't like you.
Ecthy proven so wrong...
Last edited by GePap on 03-08-2005 at 04:03
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
Hey, the day he died crude oil prices hit an all time high. I'll bet he died happy. The kids probably did it just to please the old man.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vesayen
BASICALLY, yeah.
His son is a moderate my ass. His son allows the oppresion of woman to go on under his nose besides all the ties to terrorism we can't proove, THAT alone is enough.
May the new king's reign be short. |
ves - all ive heard, is that the alleged ties to terrorism are associated with the Sudeiri seven (prince Sultan, Prince Nayef, and their brothers) not with Prince Abdullah, whose rival they are. and of course none of these are Fahds sons, they are half brothers, IIUC. sons of Ibn Saud, by different wives. Though the sons of a particular wife tend to hang together (like the Sudeiri seven, for ex) the sons of a particular wife also tend to have support from the tribe that that wife came from.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Its called freedom of religion. Unlike Judaism (which is not universalistic) Christianity and Islam do state they apply to everyone, so of course they missionize.
You object to mizzionisation? To the marketplace of religious ideas?
|
The issue here isnt so much Muslims trying to spread Islam to non-muslims. Its Wahabis trying to spread Wahabism among non-Wahabi Muslims. Pulling Muslims both from local (often Sufi) traditions, and from liberalizing tendencies, in the direction of a fundamentalism that is deeply hostile to liberal and democratic principles, and that encourages hatred of christians and Jews.
Now is that covered by the first amendment in the US? Yup, Ive never advocated closing all Wahabi institutions in the US.
But when a STATE, a state we support and have a "postive" relationship with, funds such institutions worldwide, in ways that aggravate international problems, that is a proper concern for bilateral relations.
Suppose the US govt were spending billions of dollars to fund evangelical churches and schools in Europe. And suppose in those schools hatred for Jews, Muslims, and agnostics was taught. And that followers of all other forms of Christianity were denounced as apostates, worthy of death. Would that not be a proper issue for European govts to raise with the govt of the US? Especially if practitioners of a related form evangelical Christianity had recently commited acts of terrorism around the world?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|