 |
|
dejon
|
|
I am good with either Roti or Points, if I had to choose, I am more experienced with Points.
We have what, five people interested? Surely there are more puck-heads on this board!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Imran Siddiqui
|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:37
|
|
I know I don't know as much about hockey as some of you Canadians (so don't expect that great a team from me  ), but I have ample experience running and participating in fantasy leagues. If I can be any help...
I'd vote for H2H. That always proves more interesting. Points and Roto have the unwanted side effect that if you fall back too early, you may as well give up (and most do). With H2H, even if you are pretty far back, beating, say, the top squad in the league is a good goal to look forward to.
I agree with Guy that goalies should be given less power over the final tally. Perhaps just have GAA and SV% and forget about Wins and Losses.
Also, I'd recommend taking out the Can't Cut List.
Oh, and if we are doing an offline draft (I recommend it), then Asher, as Commish (you started the league) would have to input every pick.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dejon
|
|
As I said earlier, H2H is more entertaining and creates much more banter. But you also have to watch your roster and matchups much more closely, making weekly and sometimes daily changes.
If everyone pledges to participate and stay the course during rough water, I'm okay with H2H.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999
time: 22:37
|
|
Seems like the vote is in favor of H2H?
Current stats:
code:
League ID#: 4355
League Name: Apolyton
Password: samurai
Season Type: Full
Draft Type: Offline Draft
Max Teams: 20
Scoring Type: Head-to-Head
Max Moves: No maximum
Max Trades: No maximum
Trade Reject Time: 2
Trade End Date: March 9, 2006
Waiver Time: 2 days
Can't Cut List Provider: None
Trade Review: League Votes
Post Draft Players: Follow Waiver Rules
Weekly Deadline: Daily - Tomorrow
Start Scoring on: Week 1
Roster Positions: C, C, LW, LW, RW, RW, D, D, D, D, G, G, BN, BN, BN, BN, IR
Stat Categories: G, A, +/-, PPP, FW, GAA, SV%, SHO
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001
time: 00:37
|
|
I don't have time to be super involved in player transactions, so I'd personally prefer the Points option. But if I'm in the minority, I'll go along with H2H- I'd just expect to be less competitive.
Don't know if Flubber and/or KH would be interested, but you may want to let them know about it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dejon
|
|
If we're using Faceoff Wins, from past experience I recommended adjusting the points downwards, to .5 or .25.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dejon
|
|
Oh, right.
Perhaps we should come to some sort of Gentleman's agreement about some of the evil pool tactics possible. Like stockpiling your bench with starting goalies, leaving people on IR after they're back, and hoarding specific positions your opponent(s) have deficiency in.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001
time: 00:37
|
|
Is that my vote for points, or yours Asher? If it's yours, put me down for points.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dejon
|
|
I'm going to have to go with Points.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dejon
|
|
Sorry.
Rotisserie: 0
Head-to-Head: 2
Points: 3
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001
time: 13:37
|
|
Rotisserie
And you need PIM. That way its like creating an NHL team, and like it or not, every team has a goon.
Faceoff wins seems a bit odd.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37.
Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
19-08-2005 22:03
|