 |
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Winston
The Iranian thing was a mistake. I never agreed with it.
Technically however, it was the Israelis who supplied the Iranians with the anti-tank weapons, and the U.S. then agreed to resupply the Israeli stock. Just to keep that side of it straight.
. |
Ah, so covert dealings with a country that itself kept Americans hostages and whose citizens violated diplomatic immunity is okay, as long as you do it through a third party and hope not to get found out.

And of course if you fund it through smuggling drugs into the United States and aid some terrorists while you're about it.
quote: And it wasn't done in order to court Iranian "friendship", but in the hopes of securing the release of hostages, |
I think someone left you out of the loop:
quote: The Iran-contra affair was the product of two separate initiatives during the administration of President Ronald Reagan. The first was a commitment to aid the contras who were conducting a guerrilla war against the Sandinista government of Nicaragua.
The second was to placate “moderates” within the Iranian government in order to secure the release of American hostages held by pro-Iranian groups in Lebanon and to influence Iranian foreign policy in a pro-Western direction.
[...]
This operation was directed by NSC staffer Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North. McFarlane and North were also the central figures in the plan to secretly ship arms to Iran despite a U.S. trade and arms embargo.
In early Nov., 1986, the scandal broke when reports in Lebanese newspapers forced the Reagan administration to disclose the arms deals.
|
http://www.factmonster.com/ce6/history/A0825447.html
Honest Injuns ?
quote: In 1985, while Iran and Iraq were at war, Iran made a secret request to buy weapons from the United States. McFarlane sought Reagan's approval, in spite of the embargo against selling arms to Iran. McFarlane explained that the sale of arms would not only improve U.S. relations with Iran, but might in turn lead to improved relations with Lebanon, increasing U.S. influence in the troubled Middle East. Reagan was driven by a different obsession. He had become frustrated at his inability to secure the release of the seven American hostages being held by Iranian terrorists in Lebanon. As president, Reagan felt that "he had the duty to bring those Americans home," and he convinced himself that he was not negotiating with terrorists. While shipping arms to Iran violated the embargo, dealing with terrorists violated Reagan's campaign promise never to do so. Reagan had always been admired for his honesty.
When the Lebanese newspaper "Al-Shiraa" printed an exposé on the clandestine activities in November 1986, Reagan went on television and vehemently denied that any such operation had occurred. He retracted the statement a week later, insisting that the sale of weapons had not been an arms-for-hostages deal.
|
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reagan...ts/pande08.html
Israel's part:
quote: According to the Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran-Contra Affair issued in November 1987, the sale of U.S. arms to Iran through Israel began in the summer of 1985, after receiving the approval of President Reagan. The report shows that Israel's involvement was stimulated by separate overtures in 1985 from Iranian arms merchant Manucher Ghorbanifar and National Security Council (NSC) consultant Michael Ledeen, the latter working for National Security Adviser Robert McFarlane. When Ledeen asked Prime Minister Shimon Peres for assistance, the Israeli leader agreed to sell weapons to Iran at America's behest, providing the sale had high-level U.S. approval. |
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org...tra_Affair.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LiberalAtheist
|
|
I am amazed, truly amazed at how Castro can offer us aid after we have screwed with him and Cuba in general so much.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
Well part of it is no doubt propaganda (though less "Haha, stupid America needs us" than "Look at this socialist 3rd world country being so free with it's resources"). I also think that Cuba doesn't feel anywhere near as strongly about the US as the US does about Cuba, and Cuba offers these doctors in whatever situation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
techumseh
|
 |
of the frozen North.
Apr 1999 time: 22:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Winston
Oh yeah? How would the U.S. go about maintaining an embargo in the aftermath, if they decided to suddenly disregard it to allow medical assistance in?
|
Bingo! Damn, that Fidel is clever.
quote: And - unrelated to the issue at hand, but since you mentioned it - there's nothing "honourable" about Fidel Castro. He's a despot who's had a very firm grip on Cuban balls for 46 years now. His regime is criminal and an affront to human rights.
He's doing this to embarras the U.S., because he knows it will be turned down. |
Actually, to millions in Cuba and elsewhere, he is a hero.
I think he's doing it for more reasons than you say. The first and formost is to actually help people. Second, to show that Cuba, after enduring 40 years of a crippling trade embargo by the US, is still willing to help in a crisis. Third, to show the advantages of the Cuban system in mobilizing medical aid. Fourth, as you said, if Bush somehow accepts, to undermine the economic embargo. Fifth, if Bush declines, to add to his political problems.
There was a story on the Canadian news last night with footage of Fidel speaking to several hundred Cuban doctors mobilized to go to the US if their government accepts.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LiberalAtheist
|
|
quote: [SIZE=1]
Anyway, what IS the problem with Cuba. I know the US had great "plans" for it, but, aside from being communist, whats the grudge for? |
Don't you know? There are a million reds at our border, just itching to rip off your university sweater pinko. They are perched there, just waiting to unleash Al Qaeda (not the kind we fund but the bad kind), force us to abandon God, make our kids have gay marriages, kill our puppies, incoherently socialize our economy under this global warming myth and destroy our way of life!
They are after our way of life!
I mean so what if its just a tiny island with basically no support and no way to hurt us? The only good commie is a dead commie!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
That still seems odd to me, i mean communism used to be the big threat, but surely Cuba's system must be seen as some anachronistic left over by now? If anything, the unwillingness to trade or deal with the regime strengthens it more in the eyes of most of the 3rd world.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LiberalAtheist
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lightblue
That still seems odd to me, i mean communism used to be the big threat, but surely Cuba's system must be seen as some anachronistic left over by now? If anything, the unwillingness to trade or deal with the regime strengthens it more in the eyes of most of the 3rd world. |
Bingo. Give this guy a degree, a diploma-something!
The fact is yeah, the only thing allowing a lot of the socialist system in place is in fact our trade barrier, ironically enough. You would think the US would have learned its lesson after china--tough guy rambo policies that alienate the country only perpetuate the isolationism, mutual hatred and accompanying nationalism/authoritarianism--allowing trade however opens the country up to new goods and ideas.
Americans however are not really the fastest learners, nor the most educated on matters of history.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
I still think it's the Cuban exiles in Florida that make the decisions wrt this, they're the kind of swing voters most presidential candidates need to get in their camp.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
The US has slept with enemies before...
Cuba would actually be an improvement from the former Iraqi regime and the Chinese, IMO
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|