 |
|
lupusmalus
|
|
Rome has been destined to rule the world and so she will, no matter what ideas they cooked up to prevent indefinite expansion. Oh, and fair fights are for suckers 
Last edited by lupusmalus on 27-08-2001 at 01:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edward
|
|
Does anyone know the requirements for a diplomatic win? Someone alluded to it being a popularity contest. In Civ2 that would mean no diplomatic wins after 1750 (or whatever the magic all-the-AI-hate-you date is). Will some AI always achieve diplomatic victory as soon as they all sign secret pacts together?
In Civ2, the AI rarely respected my power. In fact it made them all the more agitated, just less up-front about it. Perhaps a brown-nosing OCCer could get a diplomatic win. "Darn, that single-city civ won yet again! Everyone loves an underdog. His strategy of becoming the smallest, worst, most pitiful civ is unbeatable!" Shall the meek inherit the Earth?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Christantine The Great
|
|
Massachusetts
Jun 2000 time: 00:15
|
|
As usual the peaceful Chrisonian (aka Greek) Republic will expand from their starting position, irrigating and roading every workable tile in a city radius and building cities along the Mediterranean Sea, Persia, and England. Then I will send out settlers to build cities on all of the islands of the world to claim every resource possible. In short my goal is to aquire every resource possible to sell it at high prices to pathetic AI civs. With Currency in my hand and Trade as my crown I shall rule the world by cash! Hum, that's a good civish motto.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|