 |
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Mr. Pleasant, if you want to write a mod with aliens in it, go right ahead; I might even play it. However, "aliens" have not (to common knowledge) played a part in Earth's history. |
That was part of my point. Aliens may not have played a part in our history, but it seems to me that in some possible history of the world, aliens might have played a role. And since civ is about possible history . . .
Nonetheless, I will probably try to make an alien mod. Depends on my amount of free time and the power of editors and scripts (if scripts can be written) to do this. Ideally, I would like a small chance that a SETI program would contact aliens and these would invade, replacing barbarians (i.e. Aliens as tough barbarians). We'll see if such a thing can be implemented.\
quote: I'm afraid that you have confused resiliancy with apostacy, but that is only my opinion. Further, evangelical Christianity is not "virulent" unless God Himself is "virulent". What is commonly known, or at least accepted in our parlance as evangelical Christianity is essentially following a literal interpretation of the Bible. That is not to say that everyone who claims to be an evangelical actually is one. Jerry Falwell's recent remarks, for example, were arrogant and idiotic. Falwell supposed to know the will of God and that is wrong. |
No, I have not. Catholicism has embraced the Big Bang theory, and has opened theological discussion to evolution. Catholics do not read Genesis literally. Consider this - time is being measured in "days", but the sun is not created until the third day. But since the sun is the object by which days are measured it makes no sense to talk about proper days until the third Genesis "day". So whatever is being talked about in Genesis cannot be a proper day.
Moreover, there is no reason to suppose that God did not ensoul beings that evolved elsewhere in the universe. Surely God HAS the power to do so, right? Now, whose to say Christ didn't pay these aliens a visit. Now this might be something of a sore point to a traditionalist (almost Christ as avatar), there's no reason to think dogma does evolve so as to conform with known facts. Imagine an alien race that claims in its distant past that it was visited by the son of God. And the son of God preached essentially the message Christ bought. In that case, there's no point in being human chauvanists about Christ visiting different beings.
As for Islam, one might find that aliens had their own great prophet. While the fundamentalists might insist on Mohammed as the only ultimate prophet, more moderate Muslims could except Mohammed as the ultimate human prophet. Note - aliens would actually cause less violence to Islam than Catholicism.
Finally, Buddhism and Hinduism could take aliens completely in stride.
As for virulence and fundamentalism/evangelicalism . . .
Evangelicals should take their Bibles and cut out the entire old testament. Throw the damn thing out. Next, cut out all of the new testament except the Gospels and the book of James. Evangelicals sped far too much time harping on God's vengance and trying to deprive kids of the theory of evolution. Get back to basics. Follow what Jesus actually says. That's the important part - that's the whole point to Christianity. Jesus would not beat up gays, would not bomb abortion clinics, and would not pass laws against sodomy. The point is to love people, but most evangelicals I have met talk wrath, not love. (and don't give me this bull about "love the sinner hate the sin". If you really believed that, you wouldn't harp on the sin so much.) But I guess wrath is easier than love. Also read the book of James. Faith that does not inspire you to do the Lord's work is a dead faith. And the Lord's work is NOT going to church on sundays and protesting abortion clinics. The Lord's work is feeding the hungry, mentoring disadvantaged youths, and the like.
"Tear up the Bible you say?!" Yes. Jesus tells us that if our eye leads us into sin, pluck it out. If our hands lead us to sin, chop them off. Better to lose a part than the whole. Likewise, if the Bible with its old testament stories of wrath and Paul's letters inspire the behavior common to evangelicals, then those parts of the bible are blocking you from getting the point. Namely the stuff Jesus taught about loving your neighbor, turning the other cheek, giving up your coat. All of those other books are leading you away from the teachings of Jesus - sacrifice that part so that you may gain the whole, the essense, of Christ's teachings.
God is never virulent, only opportunists who twist God's word to enhance their own power.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JellyDonut
|
 |
Köln, Deutschland
Jul 2001 time: 06:15
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Mister Pleasant
We might suppose that in some alternate history, aliens do visit Earth, or there is an alien crash at Roswell that becomes public. Since Civ3 is about re-writing history, and we don't know that aliens could not visit us, there is no reason to disallow an alternate history to include aliens. |
And it's POSSIBLE in some alternate history that the major war units could be people dressed in banana costumes armed with sporks, so should THAT be a unit? In some alternate history, Neanderthals might have survived and humans gone extinct, so should all the civs be Neanderthals? In some alternate history, Dukakis might win the re-election in a landslide, so should HE be the American leader? All (except the last one) are far more likely to occur than aliens showing up.
I'm sure Firaxis knows better than to put aliens in Civ 3...they said they'd only keep things that *feel* like Civ, which I think means no aliens.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|