 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:15
|
|
quote: Education and a strong good moral conviction (being good) are better substitutes for religion. Religion has laid the groundwork for such moral codes, but too many Osama bin Laden's and David Koresh's exist. These people pervert their religions to justify murder, persecution, and oppression. |
You said it yourself by using the word "pervert." Religion itself isn't the culprit, it's the fanatics who misuse religion as a pretext for violence and hate that are the problem. Fundamentalists of any stripe, whether they be religious or atheist, are responsible for much of the hatred and evil of the world.
quote: educated people tend to be less religious. |
The most educated and intelligent people I have ever met, including brilliant scientists, were quite religious. They just weren't fanatics or fundamentalist. Einstein was very much a fan of God.
I believe religion is responsible for a critical amount of good work in the world, and that in truth it does offset the bad. Look at the social justice work of the Catholic Church in Central and South America. The Soup Kitchens, shelters and religious charities all across the Western world. More importantly, for most people, religion does provide the good morals and desire to perform good works that you describe. A few bad apples get all the attention, though.
And I say all of this as an Agnostic who, while believing there is a God of some form as yet unknown to man, still respects and admires those good souls who have real religious devotion and do good works.
And as for religion being responsible for billions of deaths...Last century, atheist communist regimes sparked more bloodshed than religious ones. So perhaps the tide has turned in favor of atheism being more bloody?
Now as for the game...I don't think Sid and co. were worried about encountering a PC backlash. After all, EU employs religious conflict, and I don't think people got offended. I just think they felt the scope of introducing such a concept would have been far too much in terms of keeping gameplay focused and balanced. They also want to keep somewhat of a "generic" feeling to the civs, and introducing specific religions would undermine that to a degree.
Cheers.
PS-- My great-grandfather was a Methodist minister, and he was perhaps one of the most intelligent and compassionate persons you could imagine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jason Beaudoin
|
|
Canada
Jan 1970 time: 00:15
|
|
It would have been nice that religion was a bigger part of the game because that really is what caused many wars in the past. If anything, it would have been more historically accurate.
After all, look what it's done on this thread. Say one thing against religion and BANG!... you got yourself an instant heated discussion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Akron
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Speaking as an unreligious person, I find nothing noble or admirable about those who knee-jerk trash all religion. What right do you have to expect people of different beliefs to respect yours if you don't respect theirs? I think a lot of the bad rap given to atheists and agnostics is due to their own fanatics, the fundamentalist atheists who seem to have excessive hatred of religion.
|
You are absolutely right. You don't need to be religious to be fanatical. All you need is an idea you strongly believe in and the desire to force this idea upon others. The point is, philosophers are supposed to make ideas available to people, not force them on people.
Religion would be cool and realistic, but it is highly likely that many people would take offense, as SoulAssassin already said. I'm just gonna think of it as part of culture, which it sorta is.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:15. Apolyton Time is 00:15. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|