 |
|
The Bloody Baro
|
|
I was kickin the crap out of Caeser so I go to him with the usual our troops approachBLA BLA BLA. So he says " Fool! do you think we are afraid of your puny soldiers? Well as fate would have it we are. We accept.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
I went to China back in May and found officially distributed Civ3 in many stores. The Chinese version of Civ3 uses Li Shimin instead of Mao. I think the reason is not only Taiwanese won't buy it, but also mainland censors don't allow the 'great' chairman to be ridiculed.
Last edited by Lord Merciless on 19-07-2002 at 04:22
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
Most funny leaders:
Modern Age Joan of Arc as femi-nazi, chemo-patient, GI-Joan, Sinead O'Arc, or whomever you want to call her.
Modern Age Hammurabi as Dr Evil.
Medieval Age Mao in renaissance hat.
Industrial Age Caesar in derby hat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Panzer Elite
|
|
I think that Mao looks kinda funny in his Fur hat.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Chakra
|
|
Hi,
For all the true believers (i.e. those who've been playing Civ 1 on) - do you guys get the feeling that the dialogue boxes and other conversations/text were more witty and amusing in Civ 1/2? Civ 3 has it's funny moments as well, but they don't seem to be as witty (perhaps sophisticated?) as the older ones. I seem to remember deriving a certain pleasure from saying things like,
"Consequences, Shmonsequences" to an angry Elizabeth. Or am I mistaken, lost in a nostalgic haze for the innocent pleasures of my now long-lost youth?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Red Hand
|
|
St. Paul, MN
Jul 2002 time: 23:16
|
|
Incidentally, apparently Alexander was gay, as much as we can know these things. Check out a gay hero website for proof. The site also has a very inspirational piece on Joan of Arc, although she was not a lesbian herself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Underseer
|
 |
in the general vicinity of Chicago
Jan 2003 time: 23:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by dexters
I like how Mao is represented.
Despite all the Cold War propaganda, he wasn't the kind of leader Stalin was. He meant well for the Chinese people and felt communism was the only way to bring together an Empire in decline. I think in retrospect, taking into account the disasters that were cultural revolution and the great leap forward, Communism may have been the best thing that have happened to China. It stabilized the country and made it possible for it to develop economically and I'm very very impressed with its Economic growth in the last 20 years.
China, hopefully, should be restored as one of the great world powers this century. As a Chinese, there is part of me would very much want to see that happen.
I sincerely hope the emerging middle class will inititate change that will turn China into a strong Democratic Republic, because if it can change to that form of government, with its freedoms, both personal and economic, China's economic potential is limitless and could simply dwarf America's. A 50 Trillion dollar GDP ? that's very likely and then it will truly be the central country of the human race.
I think in the next millenia, the greatest test of humanity would be to put aside cultural and racial differences and work together as a group, whether it happens via the United Nations, or through the sheer power and influence of great powers like the United States or China or perhaps a consortium or major world blocs.. If that doesn't happen we will have a very rough road ahead as a race.
Asian pride! |
I'm sailing way off topic here. Flame away!
In spite of the horror stories I've heard from Chinese immigrants—particularly those who lived through the Cultural Revolution—I really think China should remain Communist for a bit longer yet.
I'm sure a lot of Chinese Americans will demand my head for even suggesting that.
Experiences in India (and elsewhere) show that older, more conservative civilizations have serious difficulty limiting population growth under a democratic government. Why? They have trouble fully embracing women's lib, which is the only reliable and ethical means of bringing birth rates down in a democracy.
Not being able to lower birth rates can have serious consequences on the per capita prosperity of a nation (e.g. Saudi Arabia, India, etc.), which can cause serious problems for a newly evolving democracy. As a general rule, democracies don't fare well amid widespread poverty; new democracies even less so.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Abdul-Aziz
|
|
Land of Eternal Truth
Feb 2003 time: 08:16
|
|
Arabian leader... I would have chosen Prophet Muhamad...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Abdul-Aziz
|
|
Land of Eternal Truth
Feb 2003 time: 08:16
|
|
Master Zen, :-)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|