 |
|
mharmless
|
|
Posting from Athens, Greece? I thought I razed that city yesterday and used the population that I hadn't killed to build my pan-african road to bring the might of the legion to Zululand?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mharmless
|
|
Of course. And I'm sitting here with my sister-wife and my son-nephew typing this into a beat up 386 in the back of my pickup truck.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Enigma
|
|
Midland, MI, USA
Feb 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
I voted for Persians, because the Immortal unique unit is HUGE!
Legions are blah, you don't need that extra defense in the ancient age, 1 or 2 elite spearmen will give all the backup my immortals need.
It takes a LOONG time for immortals to become obsolete, they are easily the longest lasting of any unique unit, they are useful until calvalry.
The double worker rate from industrious is very big, and the scientific bonus is nice for getting culture and 3 extra techs over the course of the game.
As far as militaristic giving you tons of extra leaders I disagree... I have gotten 3 great leaders and am only 1/2 way done with the midevil age as the persians, I have conquered the Russians and am about to attack the Babylonians, this is only on a medium sized map mind you.
If we knew about the actual statistics for how often militaristic gives you a great leader it would be nice.... DAN MAGHDA/SOREN JOHNSEN PLEASE APPEAR HERE!
Anyways I change my civ preferences pretty frequently, I have only beaten 1 game so far as americans, all I know for sure is that Industrious ROCKS!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mharmless
|
|
Defense of three is far from worthless, particularly in the ancient age. Legions can take and hold any position in the ancient era with hardly any difficulty. They have the same defense as middle ages units and an offense factor that is not serriously rivaled till the advent of calvery.
Hell, if the game lasts long enough I find myself deploying them even in the more modern eras. By the time the end game is nearing, I find myself with a huge army of elite legions. I use them to garrison towns and to pick off single enemy units (even higher tech ones) for the chance to spawn yet annother great leader.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
YefeiPi
|
|
Canada
Jul 2001 time: 00:16
|
|
quote: I'll take German Panzers over Chinese Riders anyday!!! |
That's IF you ever make it to the panzers when my Chinese riders put the misery out of your civ.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
mharmless
|
|
Fortified hoplite in a city less than size seven on a plains will beat an equal rank legion 57.85% of the time. Decent odds, true. But a legion will have the same odds of beating your swordsman when the legion is fortified on open ground (to starve your cities). The true power of the legion is that it combines the defense of the hoplite with the offense of a swordsman, for the same price as just building a swordsman. The best offensive and defensive infantry of the era, rolled up into one unit. A situation that never repeats itself.
The legions can take any peice of ground, possibly at some cost, true. But they don't need to. You can't protect your entire road network. Once the legions have you on the defensive, relying on hoplites, its already over. The roman player can keep expanding, and keep putting pressure on the greek player to keep them bottled up nicely. The greek player hasn't got that option, because their best offensive unit (assumeing they still have iron) will lose against a legion on both offense and on defense, more often than not. True, they can bring along hoplites with the swordsmen. But faced with an equal number of just legions, the legions will defeat the stack no matter who attacks first.
In a *** for tat war of attrition in the ancient era, the roman player will gain ground, against any Civ. The opponent will end up on the defensive, there is nothing they can do about it untill the advent of knights or the longbow.
Now, all of the above assumes roughly equal skill on the part of the players. If the greek player is better at manageing a war, uses superior tactics, and suprises the roman player, then the greek player will of course win. If the roman player has the edge in skill, then the decimation of the greek player will be all the swifter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Archmage
|
|
Arizona Nevada border
Nov 2001 time: 23:16
|
|
I challenge anyone who doubts the power of industriousness to play as the Persians or Chinese. Then go back and play a non-industrious Civ and you'll be cursing your damned workers for being so S L O W...
My vote is for the Persians, as I have done easily the best with them....
Anyone else and I cant get the advances fast enough...of course neither can the AI which is my biggest complaint about this game...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mercury
|
|
Lviv, Ukraine
Nov 2001 time: 07:16
|
|
ROME is the best!
VENI VIDI VICI!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
teturkhan
|
 |
Edmonton, Alberta
Nov 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
where are the Turks & Mongols?
Turkic People have had a huge impact on the history of mankind. Finland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Turkiye, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakistan, Uzbekistan, kirghizistan, Tajikistan, Northern Iraq, Northern Iran, Uyguristan (west province of China), Kazan and so many other places through out Russia have a Turkic heritage or share a kinship with them. To ignore this is to deny history...
I think it is due time to give at LEAST ONE member of the Altaic language branch their dues...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ElitePersian
|
|
Vancouver, BC
Nov 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
it must be fun playing the romans since you can have such a vast empire and get leaders more frequently, but sometimes that can become a hassle. I love ancient warfare, so i love playing as persians, and i love the extra worker speed, it makes a really big diff. at the start of the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ElitePersian
|
|
Vancouver, BC
Nov 2000 time: 05:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by teturkhan
where are the Turks & Mongols?
Turkic People have had a huge impact on the history of mankind. Finland, Hungary, Bulgaria, Turkiye, Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, Kazakistan, Uzbekistan, kirghizistan, Tajikistan, Northern Iraq, Northern Iran, Uyguristan (west province of China), Kazan and so many other places through out Russia have a Turkic heritage or share a kinship with them. To ignore this is to deny history...
I think it is due time to give at LEAST ONE member of the Altaic language branch their dues... |
I agree, i think someone is working on an expansion civilization where it includes arab nations.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
King of Rasslin
|
|
Workers are cheap, and the legion will beat an immortal if it's in a large city. Walls are also cheap to the Romans.
Industrious IS overrated as the early cities are focused on expanding, they only need 2 or 3 improved squares anyway. Plus, the legion's defence is not rivaled until you get to pikemen anyway, and only beaten until musketmen are available. AND it has 3 offence.
You gotta go with Rome.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|