 |
|  |
 |
|
DrFell
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Surgeon
well find a game you like and PISS OFF.
Ok its rude but seriously this board is FULL of people that just cant stop whining. It's sick! If you dont like it, if its no fun just STOP. Some stores where I live even have a 7 day 'return it if you dont like it' policy.
Phew. I know I'm one of the rare people on these boards that like the game but seriously sometimes things just arent what you expect. GET OVER IT! |
Obviously you don't know what it's like to have played and enjoyed a game for years, and then find the latest incarnation is a sick joke. Civ2 multiplay is really the only game that I still play now, basically Civ3 has killed my desire to play TBS games and I can't see it being viable for multiplay, which is the one thing that could save it. The rules are completely unsuitable, and are being further limited by Firaxis to appease the newbies. For example, palace costing 1000 shields? What a joke. The leaders system is a joke too, I think most people are whining because they cannot believe the game could be so bad.
Also, I notice it's generally the more serious players here and the ones who were lucky enough to have played games like civ2 who are complaining about the game. Maybe you should stop 'whining about the whiners', sometimes people don't behave the way you want. GET OVER IT!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DrFell
|
|
No, right from the start I hated the game. I played it for awhile, but it seemed to be so set on limiting the human and dragging you down to the level of the ai (max tech speed caps? What the hell were they thinking? If that isn't the most blatant limiting of the human I've ever seen...). It's also very slow, there's little point playing the game past the medieval age becuase cavalry is by far the most imbalancing unit in the game (knights are good too). The ai is poor (perhaps good compared to the AI in civ2, nothing compared to even the worst humans I have ever seen without it's deity level cheating), basically I can't play a game that has no multiplayer option and sucks in single play.
Sure Civ2 had issues, but those were more minor and didn't adverely affect gameplay. Civ2 is fundamentally flawed, and the only way I can think for it to be fixed is if Firaxis release a patch which changed almost the entire game. That's not going to happen, this game will, in my opinion and many others, always be nothing compared to Civ2.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
I do not think it is a waste of time, especially when I see other people voicing similar concerns as my own. As long as people complain I have hope that one day soon the problems will be addressed. If you think the game is fine, oh well I guess you are easily amused. I on the other hand expect a whole lot more than what was released as a $50 game. If the game was just going to be fluff they should have thrown in all kinds of rendered cinemas for wonder movies and a cool ending movie. I could have lived with that I guess. Civ III is worth about $14.99 in it's current state.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Willem
Yeah well, I no longer find it amusing bashing trolls, so I'm not going to bother with a rebuttal. I have to ask myself why I come here, it's certainly not for intelligent conversation. |
When you say something that reveals intelligence to me, I would be happy to lead you in that conversation. But I think you illusion yourself to that concept until you give yourself that 'reality check' I meantioned and realize that this isn't the "how many ways we can bend and distort the truth about Civilization III to increase sales" forum. Move along, nothing to see here.. hey! get that guy with the camera, hurry!
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Yeah well, I no longer find it amusing bashing trolls, so I'm not going to bother with a rebuttal. I have to ask myself why I come here, it's certainly not for intelligent conversation. |
What laughable nonsense. It is always the final Hail Mary of a beaten debator: "Hey, you're just stupid!"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Willem
Blah,blah, blah. Wake me up when you have something of importance to say. |
No, trust me, your better off asleep you make more sense that way.
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Libertarian
|
|
quote: Wake me up when you have something of importance to say. |
If you could cock an ear for just a moment, I think this is pretty important: holding a view that is different from yours does not constitute any lack of intelligence on the part of the person holding the opposing view.
I don't believe that you're stupid just because you like Civ3. My first presumption is that we have different tastes in games. I believe that Civ3 appeals to a particular fan-base. More checkers than chess, if you know what I mean.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ironikinit
|
|
Maybe a good idea would be if whiners and fanboys (i.e., those who dislike and like the game) could stick to their own threads. That will cut down on the hard feelings. For instance, I'll stop posting in threads like this one if whiners will stay away from newbie questions, strategy threads, and generally favorable review threads. What do you think.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ironikinit
Maybe a good idea would be if whiners and fanboys (i.e., those who dislike and like the game) could stick to their own threads. That will cut down on the hard feelings. For instance, I'll stop posting in threads like this one if whiners will stay away from newbie questions, strategy threads, and generally favorable review threads. What do you think. |
First of all the term "whiners" comes from a childish name-calling category of people who can't stand criticism. And second, why should anyone leave? If you don't like it, don't read it!
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BanastreTa
|
 |
New Haven, CT, USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:16
|
|
Charles,
You are correct in identifying that the term "whiner" is a rather childish name-calling response that usually comes from a select group of people.
I submit that the term "fanboy," however, is no different. This is also a childish name-calling response that usually comes from a select group of people. It is but the flip side of the same coin.
I think discussion would be more fruitful for all involved if participants could eschew the gratuitous name-calling. Otherwise, the "debate" hearkens back to the intellectual level of playground disputes.
Can't we all just get along?
BT
Last edited by BanastreTa on 16-01-2002 at 01:20
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CharlesUFarley
|
|
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 21:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by BanastreTa
Charles,
I submit that the term "fanboy," however, is no different. This is also a childish name-calling response that usually comes from It is but the flip side of the same coin. |
Wrong.
Fanboy: "Fan" to cheer or admire something, "Boy" pertaining to the individual's sex.
Whiner: "Whine" to cry, sob or complain in a childlike manner. "Whiner" to cry or sob constantly for personal gain.
There is a BIG difference.
But I do agree, name-calling of any sort ruins any progressive constructive discussion, so put me down for the vote against name calling and childish behavour.
Charles.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pilfur
|
|
Simple solution to all of this. Put Civ3 away and pull out a copy of Colonization. You'll enjoy it. Why they never made a sequal to this Civ cousin (also created by Sid) I just can't comprehend. I still have it on my hard drive and still play it frequently. Its tiny compared to the games of today but better styled than civ 1 and just as addictive as civ2.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|