 |
|
Sceptor107
|
|
israel never used mass-destructive weapons against its people or its neighbor. irsael is responsible and doesnt vow to wipe islam
off the face of the earth.
saddam has gased the kurds twice and the iranians 3 seperate occassions (see iran-iraq war)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sceptor107
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saint Marcus
The French, Britons and Germans used to gas eachother as well.
And the Americans nuked two Japanese cities.
Why is that less bad than what Iraq does? |
do i have to explain this like you are a little kid?
He hit me so its ok I hit him back? Right?
so because of what europe and america did 60 years ago (and hastn done since) makes it ok for iraq to gas its neighbors? thats stupid logic, and the kind of logic that leads to events like munich. when badboys can get away with what they want too. i cant believe im argueing this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sceptor107
|
|
No it wasnt. It was instigated bye your little friend khomeini, who began arming Shiite's in South Eastern Iraq. Which USA wanted to stop because the whole region was boiling over. At the time, we did business Saddam. Why wouldnt we? he was there, he was lesser of an evil at the time.....(hitler-stalin)
also, remember the hostages now?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sceptor107
|
|
Should also mention, Saddam did 98.9% of his business with the Soviet Union...So blame them. (And for Afghanistan also)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sceptor107
|
|
also thank the frencsh for jimmy-rigging together that anti-aircraft system that shot down 60 coalition jets.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
macaskil
|
|
Comrade Tribune
Perhaps you can explain to a fellow socialist why you're such a fan of Saddam Hussein, a man who has killed more Muslims than anyone else alive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tribune
|
 |
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999 time: 06:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by macaskil
Perhaps you can explain to a fellow socialist why you're such a fan of Saddam Hussein, a man who has killed more Muslims than anyone else alive. |
First of all, I am not a 'fan' of Saddam Hussein.
With this out of the way, my position is that the US don´t have a business to meddle in anybody´s internal affairs, or starting a war against them without casus belli. This would include Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lybia, North Korea, China, did I forget anyone?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Your logic is as flawless as your grammar. |
Then lets correct the grammar and clarify the logic. In 1993, ex-President George Bush paid a visit to Kuwait, an independent and sovereign state. At that time Iraq was pretending to go along with weapons inspections, and no military action was being undertaken against Iraq. Iraqi agents attempted to assasinate Mr. Bush while he was in Kuwait, but the plot was foiled.
This establishes the following
A. The US has a casus belli against Iraq, 9-11 and fears of biological and chemical weapons aside.
B. Iraq is in fact a sponsor of international terrorism, in particular international terrorism directed against the United States. At a time when the world community is clamping down on state sponsorship of international terrorism, it is appropriate to take action with respect to the Iraqi regime.
C. Given Iraq's past sponsorship of international terrorism, coupled with its hatred for the US, it is not unreasonable to expect that at some point they will ally with Al-qaeeda, despite Iraq's secularist agenda. Stranger alliances have taken place in the past. This supposition is only reinforced by reports from Czech intelligence of contact between Iraqi intelligence and Al-Qaeeda operatives prior to 9-11.
LOTM
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|