 |
|  |
 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Oh man. BucksRock, do some reading willya.
1. Infogrames is the publisher, not Firaxis. [My opinion now] The only option Firaxis would have had was whether to blow the dead line (and be in default of a contract with the publisher) or to brush it up enough before release and stick with it later (which they are doing). [/My opinion]
2. The guts of the development team were ripped out a while after the project was begun when Brian Reynolds and a bunch of *his guys* walked. That left Firaxis with the deal, but no team. [My opinion now] I think it's a small wonder (pun intended) that the final team created as decent a game as they did. And, again to their credit, they are not abandoning it. [/My opinion]
*One thing I take exception with is flaming the programmers.* This I agree with, only as I pointed out, Firaxis is in the camp of the programmers. Actually, it is the camp of the programmers, or whatever. As for the evils of publishers, ever heard of BattleCruiser3000?
The thread is very entertaining, although I disagree with many of Zylka's theses. Just call me catholic. |
Please save us from the "evil publisher/noble developer myth". Firaxis was responsible for development. If they couldn't keep a team together, that's their fault.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tarquelne
|
|
quote: Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Against BBs and a/c carriers? My understanding was that in WWII a sub had very little chance even against a destroyer. |
You might want to post that in the "Naval history and civ3 thread"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zylka
I stopped responding a while ago... remember, when I said I was sick and tired of patronizing worthless newbies?
|
Talking about yourself again?
You aren't responding because you got blown out of the water. You are down to calling experienced long term gamers newbies because because they just joined here.
Pretty pathetic.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tarquelne
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GP
subs sank plenty of warships... |
(Some figures are in the - ahem - Naval History thread.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tuberski
Touchy!
I haven't read this thread in three days....yet somehow I didn't miss anything relevant! |
There was plenty of relevant stuff. Zylka's response was to call people newbies. Spread it around to many when he was unable to rebut.
FG seems to have a grudge. This isn't the first time he has gone out of his out his way to attack me. Besides I wasn't being touchy. FG is getting an education. Its not my fault that he refuses to learn how to flame with style and wit or at least respond in a civil manner.
Soon I may give up him. He may be lost cause as a student.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|