 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ixnay37
How much anime have you actually watched? |
Too much. ANY is too much. It causes brain rot so you will be deieved into tolerating low frame rates you would never accept in a game.
quote:
I would say that hardly any is as bad as you describe it. |
Yes some flip between two or three cells at 10 frames a second while scolling a background till the next slide comes up. Lip animation on fixed figures does not count as frames.
I will give them this much though. None are as badly animated as Clutch Cargo. They superimposed real lips instead of animating them. REALY weird looking.
J. Ward's Rocky and Bullwinkle had some realy low frame rates too but there were funny.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:18
|
|
--"I mean, this is the culture that brought us Nasubi, Yatta!,"
Don't forget Domo-kun and wasabi flavored gummi fish.
--"From our Western perspective, are the Japanese truly nuts?"
Just different. It's not like Westerners aren't nuts themselves. I mean we've got our Sumo fetish, only we put pads on them and run them in groups and call it football (or go with less pads and call it rugby). We make cartoons about singing teapots and so on.
Edit: Almost forgot this one:
Winnie the Pooh Worships Satan (this is a link directly to the .mov file).
--"4 frames per second is NOT animation. Its a slide show."
Someone's been watching Violinist of Hamelin, I see. Try something recent like Cowboy Bebop.
Wraith
"She's an unremarkable woman... who's dazzling, dangerous, and utterly untouchable. Just an ordinary woman..."
-- Faye Valentine ("Cowboy Bebop")
Last edited by Wraith on 16-04-2002 at 07:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Japan has just as much right to maintain an army as any other nation on Earth. |
I have never maintained that Japan has no right in having an armed force. This appears to be a strawman.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
As for Japan having the second highest defense budget in the world, IIRC Japan has always limited its defense budget to 1% of its GDP. When you have the second largest economy on Earth, however, 1% is a lot of money. |
I hate to break this to you, but they have been spending more than that 1% for years now.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Despite this, I don't think anyone who is knowledgable on the subject would claim that Japan is remilitarizing or planning to abandon its peacetime constitution. |
I hate to break this to you, but they are actually planning to amend the constitution to remove restrictions placed on the military.
While the Defense Force is not supposed to be deployed outside of Japan, the current government is ignoring that restiction too.
So tell me, how does your Appeal to Authority work?
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Japan has a capable and high tech force, but it is built specifically for defensive purposes (hence the name "Self Defense Forces"). |
It do not have carriers, yet, but it can still project power to neighbouring countries.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Japan has the money and technology to build a world class offensive force, but they haven't done so yet and have expressed no plans to do so. |
No plans? Then why are they thinking of screwing around with the constitution now that they have been violating the provisions left and right?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
I hate to break this to you, but they have been spending more than that 1% for years now. |
Well, the CIA World Factbook seems to agree with me. According to it, Japan spent .96% of its GDP on military expenditures in 2001. Correct me if I'm wrong, but .96% is less than 1%... 
quote: I hate to break this to you, but they are actually planning to amend the constitution to remove restrictions placed on the military.
While the Defense Force is not supposed to be deployed outside of Japan, the current government is ignoring that restiction too. |
To the best of my knowledge, the only proposed changes to the constitution have involved the participation of Japanese forces in international peacekeeping missions. In this capacity, the Japanese have served in Cambodia, Mozambique, and Rwanda as part of UN forces. Pretty scary, isn't it?
The Self Defense Forces have also sent some ships to help the US in its war on terrorism, but these ships are being used in a support role, not in combat. You could technically claim that this is a violation of the Japanese constitution, but I don't think that these types of deployments violate the constitution's pacifistic spirit.
quote: It do not have carriers, yet, but it can still project power to neighbouring countries. |
Sure they do...
Japan would be hard pressed to project its power to South Korea, which is right next door. It is impossible for Japan to project any meaningful military power towards China, its biggest potential rival. Japan's military force only extends as far as the range of its air force which, lacking carriers, isn't very far.
quote: No plans? Then why are they thinking of screwing around with the constitution now that they have been violating the provisions left and right? |
Show me some evidence for these plans and maybe I'll revise my views. Until then, I'll treat all this fear of a resurgent Japanese military for what it is: baseless conjecture and paranoia.
quote: This appears to be a strawman. |
quote: So tell me, how does your Appeal to Authority work? |
High school debating techniques don't help your argument as much as some actual facts would...
edit: Forgot about Japanese peacekeeping missions in Mozambique and Rwanda.
Last edited by Drake Tungsten on 16-04-2002 at 11:08
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Well, the CIA World Factbook seems to agree with me. According to it, Japan spent .96% of its GDP on military expenditures in 2001. Correct me if I'm wrong, but .96% is less than 1%...  |
That's nice, except that you forgot to mention that's just an estimate 
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
To the best of my knowledge, the only proposed changes to the constitution have involved the participation of Japanese forces in international peacekeeping missions. |
That's because you don't know enough.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
In this capacity, the Japanese have served in Cambodia, Mozambique, and Rwanda as part of UN forces. Pretty scary, isn't it? |
Considering that any breach of the constitution is still a breach, yes.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
The Self Defense Forces have also sent some ships to help the US in its war on terrorism, but these ships are being used in a support role, not in combat. |
Hardly defending itself, eh? 
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
You could technically claim that this is a violation of the Japanese constitution, but I don't think that these types of deployments violate the constitution's pacifistic spirit. |
Supporting attacks against other countries by deploying to areas outside of Japan? You call that pacifistic? You certainly has an interesting definition of pacifism.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Sure they do...
Japan would be hard pressed to project its power to South Korea, which is right next door. It is impossible for Japan to project any meaningful military power towards China, its biggest potential rival. Japan's military force only extends as far as the range of its air force which, lacking carriers, isn't very far. |
You have completely forgotten about their threats of building thousands of nuclear missiles? Besides, they certainly have tankers.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Show me some evidence for these plans and maybe I'll revise my views. |
That's fine, you can keep your view all you want. But check this a, this, and this.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
Until then, I'll treat all this fear of a resurgent Japanese military for what it is: baseless conjecture and paranoia. |
Just because you don't know about it doesn't mean it's "baseless conjecture and paranoia". Considering that many Japanese, esp rightwing politicans, show absolutely no remorse for their deeds in WWII, there is every right for the neighbouring countries to be concerned.
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
High school debating techniques don't help your argument as much as some actual facts would... |
If you have facts you wouldn't resort to fallacies. Now show me those facts of yours.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
That's nice, except that you forgot to mention that's just an estimate  |
The Factbook doesn't list it as an estimate.
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/
Check it out. It's at the very bottom of the page about Japan.
At any rate, you're paranoid about a return of Japanese militarism. Yes, Japan did some horrible things in WWII, but to assume that any move by Japan to change its constitution now will inevitably lead to the IJA stomping through Asia again is absurd. The whole region has changed drastically in the past 57 years. The Japanese public won't support a return to militarism and even if they did, I don't think that Japan would (or could) take military action in Asia. Why try to conquer regions with military force when you already control them economically? Japan has little interest in expanding its military; I think that if you would research Koizumi's proposals a little more closely you would find that U.S. pressure is behind them. The U.S. wants Japan to assume more of a leadership role in East Asia, but Japan appears content to leave the military role in the region to the U.S. Why wouldn't they want free military protection?
I just wish the hardliners in Japan and their counterparts in China and Korea would just bury the hatchet. The Japanese should apologize for their actions in WWII and the Koreans should stop cutting off digits every time a Japanese PM visits the Yasukuni Shrine. Radicals on both sides are poisoning what should be a peaceful and prosperous new order in East Asia. Just my two cents.
edit: The CIA World Factbook also has this to say:
Government-industry cooperation, a strong work ethic, mastery of high technology, and a comparatively small defense allocation (1% of GDP) have helped Japan advance with extraordinary rapidity to the rank of second most technologically powerful economy in the world after the US and third largest economy in the world after the US and China.
But then again, I don't know enough, right? 
Last edited by Drake Tungsten on 16-04-2002 at 12:36
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Sava,
Go to hell. The US suffered some minor losses during 911 and you people were all gung-ho against the Taliban. They are your benevolent Uncle Bob compared to the IJA. There is completely no justification at all for Japan to maintain a large army. Absolutely none. |
Look children, I found the Apolyton North Korean Mole!!!
Every nation has the right to defend itself. If they want to spend tons of money on defense, let them. You're just mad because your commie friends in China and North Korea can't invade Japan.
BTW, what does 911 have to do with this topic? I don't recall mentioning it. I was for a military campaign in the entire Mid-East region before 9-11. You forget, I am a power monger. My eventual goal is to become dictator of the planet. (I'm not kidding) Sure, I might be insane, but where's the fun in being normal?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:18
|
|
--"Japanese movie industry has been rotting."
Yeah, their live action industry peaked a while ago. Of course, Hollywood peaked a long time ago.
--"And please name these poor series so I can avoid them."
There are some that are done at extremely low frame rates. This is just a budget thing; some of these shows are done on incredibly small budgets. The one I mentioned above, Violinist of Hamelin, is probably the worst offender in this regard.
--"But what I don't understand is why they have so little sex."
Cultural thing, at least partly blamable on the post-WW2 US occupation. The way things are in Japan now, kids (especially guys) have to focus on school very heavily. Contact between the sexes is fairly limited most of time, so they don't get a chance to learn how to act around girls (or girls around guys) before dating age.
--"while I'm here, what's the deal with anime? why is it so popular when it looks so stupid?"
What about it looks stupid to you? There are many styles within anime, so it would help to know which one you're talking about.
In any case, the real draw (couldn't resist) of anime to me is the stories. Stuff like Magic User's Club, Serial Experiments: Lain, Jin-Roh, etc. Hollywood can't seem to churn out anything more than extremely lame comedies (usually based almost soley on physical or bodily function humor) or over the top action movies (with Good vs Evil and a Happy Ending (tm)). That gets boring pretty quickly.
--"The only new stuff I can remember by name is Sailor Moon."
It's not really all that new, either. Try watching something like Read or Die, or Figure 17.
Or I could be mean and suggest Digi Charat or Tiny Snow Fairy Sugar 
--"Maybe the low frame rate is part of the difference that gives anime it's appeal."
Anime is a growth off of the manga (comic book) industry. It's taken a lot of traditions from there. The style is still more important than the frame rate overall, but most productions any more are able to do pretty decent animation work. Then there's stuff like Studio Ghibli's movies...
--"what the hell is Sailor Moon ?"
Anime series about a group of "magical girls". Think young female superheroes and you won't be too far off.
The US dubbed version got chopped up when it was brought over. There were some things that US editors didn't want kids to see, among them a relationship between two of the Outer Senshi.
This kind of thing happens all the time. If you're watching anime on Fox, it's probably been heavily altered. Cardcaptors, for instance, is a chopped version of Cardcaptor Sakura. The US version brings a secondary character into equal promininence with the main character (editors again; didn't think the US was ready for a female lead without a guy around to fix everything) and attempts to obscure a lot of relationships. They've actually pieced together new episodes by splicing together two or more. Ugh. Almost as bad as Robotech.
Wraith
"It's not Brits who think American readers are a bunch of whinging morons with the geo-social understanding of a wire coathanger, it's American editors."
-- Terry Pratchett (alt.fan.pratchett)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|