Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Civ3-General-Archive > Trade dominance ? let civ iii be a civ game.
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (6): [ <<   3   4   5   6   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
SerapisIV is offline SerapisIV
King
Hartford, CT, USA
Feb 2001
time: 00:12
Post  Old Post 24-04-2001 11:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#151 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I think the main problem then is caravans, or trade by city production. I'm pretty sure that the problem is going away. If you read closely the CGW article and the website, it is noted that cities are trading commodoties when connected by road or harbor, not by unit. I can hope that the connection is automatic. Then trade is opporated not by caravans, but on your infrastructure (roads harbors) and what you ahve to give (resources within your city radius). This could also mean that half your civ has oil, while the other doesn't if you don't provide the infrastructure for its transport. Looking at it from that perspective, I really like the idea of trade as it appears to be modeled in CivIII

Stuff2 is offline Stuff2
Warlord

Sep 1999
time: 05:12
Post  Old Post 24-04-2001 22:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#152 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

cyklotron: I agree. I may have another way of expression myself but I agree.

Lawrence of Arabia is offline Lawrence of Arabia
King
of the Gulag Archipelago
Apr 2001
time: 06:12
Exclamation  Old Post 25-04-2001 08:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#153 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

Trading should be valuable but not essential. If you can develope a strat in which you dont have to use trade then thats good. If you develope a strat which uses trade, then good. And by the way, trade did not provoke our biggest wars. Religion did.
Religious wars:
All 12 Crusades
WW2
Serbia/Kosovo/Macedonia/Croatia/its a big mess
Ottoman Empire vs. Constanstinople
Moors wars (Reconquista)
France vs. islam (12th century with Roland, Charlemange and Pepin the Brief)
Roman Eastern Empire vs. Roman Western Empire
Pakistan vs. India (although its not much of a war)
Civil war in Sudan (majority islamics against rebel catholics)
Somalia (same stlye as sudan but different religions)
Anglo-Saxons vs. Normans

When a populace changed religion, they allied themselves with people of the same religion
Vikings, Romanians
When Protestanism came along, there was another switch in allegiances
Germany (Prot.) Austria Hungary (Prot. ) UK (Prot.) and the Nordic countries grew closer together
France (Catho) Ireland (Catho) Spain (Catho), Italy (Catho)

Religion has caused more deaths than any other reason. During the Crusades, the Crusaders looted, pillaged, and burned as much as they fought the Muslims.It was a sort of excuse the whole 'free the holy land'. The Hugenots, Calvinists, Protestants, Jews, and Muslims in France and Spain were killed off or forced to switch during the Inquisition. Threre was no trade involved in this.

In conclusion i want to say that i have nothing against any religions and that i am not trying to prove that they are bad etc etc.
Also, I dont know quite what this whole post has to do with the subject, but ill post it anyways,

------------------
Its okay to smile; you're in America now

 
Pages (6): [ <<   3   4   5   6   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0297 seconds (84.75% PHP - 15.25% MySQL) with 30 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net