 |
This is a retarded practice that must end
This poll is closed. |
| You're right |
   |
1 |
25.00% |
| You're right |
   |
1 |
25.00% |
| You're right |
   |
1 |
25.00% |
| You're right |
   |
1 |
25.00% |
| Total: |
4 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:13
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Eroberer
Sleepy, were you really just trying not to make a point? |
Is there a point to any of this, berry?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:13
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Eroberer
How is that convoluted? Ah speaks the queen's English ah tells yeh. Anyway, if you're not going to stay on topic, Boris, please stop harassing me. |
You said:
>>>UK, no they haven't. not ever. maybe once or twice, but beyond that, you're wrong.<<<
You contradict yourself in the space of a few words. You give the absolute "No the haven't, not ever." That means, unequivocally, no. You then say "maybe once or twice." Even once would be a complete contradiction of never. You then say "but beyond that, you're wrong." This is nonsensical, as you couldn't possibly know how many times it had been referred to as such or by who. You're not omniscient.
Ergo, total convolution. And since this thread is totally OT (that's off-topic, not Old Testament, in case you were confused), being OT in it is a moot point.
Cheers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eroberer
|
 |
"Myths which are believed in tend to become true"
Jan 1970 time: 00:13
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
You said:
>>>UK, no they haven't. not ever. maybe once or twice, but beyond that, you're wrong.<<<
You contradict yourself in the space of a few words. You give the absolute "No the haven't, not ever." That means, unequivocally, no. You then say "maybe once or twice." Even once would be a complete contradiction of never. You then say "but beyond that, you're wrong." This is nonsensical, as you couldn't possibly know how many times it had been referred to as such or by who. You're not omniscient.
Ergo, total convolution. And since this thread is totally OT (that's off-topic, not Old Testament, in case you were confused), being OT in it is a moot point.
Cheers. |
You found that, didja? Good job. Here's a cookie!
I was making fun of his notion. It's almost purely nonsensical talk.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|