 |
|
|
Go back and read the post. This poll was back in March of 2000. One year and 2 months ago.
------------------
|
|
| |
|
|
Mokael
|
|
70 bucks? I can a get a cheap h ...
anyhow -- I'll never pay more 50 bucks for any game, Civ III or not. I can be patient.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
I would pay whatever. It is no big deal to me.
------------------
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ubersandwich
|
|
The Land of Misfit Toys.
Jul 2000
time: 05:12
|
|
Hrmm... Don't get me wrong, I love the Civ series, in fact, it is one of the few games that has passed the test of time for me (sorry, I couln't resist). But I would be weary of paying more for a game that had "extas" that I already own or a figurine that would only cluter further my already small, yet quite busy apartment.
If they released both at the same time, I would have no objections (yes, that is big of me, har har) but I can honestly say I would spend my money on the the less expensive, yet just as playable version.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2001 00:59
Besides the fact that it is Microprose (not Firaxis) that own the rights for Civ-1/Civ-2, why on earth should they add so much old stuff?? And "gaming guide for all games" - my God, how much does that weigh? Ever heard of transport- and storage-fees? 
Yes, it can all be in PDF-format, but is it really worth the expenses? I think not.
|
|