 |
|
H Tower
|
|
they only have two that we can see. what if washington ahs pikemen behind those city walls? would our crusaders, or even dragoons stand a chance?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JCP
|
 |
Paris, France, Europe
Aug 2001 time: 06:19
|
|
Good campaign, Prez.
For the following, as main cities are walled, let us not waste our brilliant units in front attacks.
As communist, bribing is not a bad thing if it is for a good goal !
The aim may be to conquer Egyptian Capital, by sabotage of the walls with diplomats, then attacking by crusaders and, after conquest, bribing their poor remaining cities.
For Americans, we need more forces, with high attack power (I like progress to cavalry in that situation) .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
quote: Originally posted by skywalker
If we're going to be that way why don't we just completely halt our attacks until we get armor (sarcasm)? We have to attack with overwhelming numbers of units; of course the defender has the advantage. |
i just don't see how an effective campaign can be carried out with our current forces or even lots of our current types of units. the defenders strength is too great right now IMO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gen. Hancock
|
|
Ohio, USA
May 2002 time: 00:19
|
|
I feel we should not attack them at all. Leave the Americans alone. Negotiate peace with them and make them our Allies. I am sure they will become a strong and very valuable allie. Let us end this bloody conquest of imperialism and focus on trade, the economy, health, life expectancy, and literacy. It is not sufficient that we should be the only civilization in the world.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bear
|
 |
chieftaining something
May 2002 time: 05:19
|
|
I'm quite a new citizen (been looking at this for a while, but not posted), but maybe I can offer my advice?
You say you're worried about the pikemen that might be in walled cities. Presumably, there would be attack units as well? I propose this..
Several archers (or equivalent) fortify themselves in a square each adjacent to the city. After a few turns, the cities attack units will have attacked, and hopefully lost (provided the archers are veteran). After this, the weakened archers are withdrawn, and immediately a new group of archers is brought in, to the same positions. This continues until the enemy units stop attacking from within the city - this means their attack units are dead.
We then move two settlers in to one of the squares a fortified archer occupies. They both build a fortress, so it will be built very quickly. The other archers withdraw, and all fortify in this new fortress. That has taken care (hopefully) of the cities attack capabilities.
After this, the settlers move round the city, building fortresses at strategically placed points so enemy units can not escape, and new ones can not get through the gaps. The archers then fortify these new fortresses (probably 3 fortresses in total). The city is now completely under siege.
Finally, to take the city, diplomats take out the city walls, and the huge horde of crusaders someone suggested we build will attack. However, it would probably be far better if diplomats took out these buildings:
City Walls, Happiness buildings (Temple, Colloseam, Cathedral etc).
After that, the city should, hopefully go into disorder, and it can be bribed more easily. I'm not sure about the state of our finances, but maybe its time for a tax increase?
Just my thoughts 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
you mean incite revolt? i bet that would be too expensive this close to the enemies' capitals
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|