 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999
time: 22:19
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
You guys got NEP 1 repealed by voting in Mulroney, correct? (hazy on this) |
Here's a fun article on the NEP: http://www.nationalpost.com/content...111699oil2.html
Some excerpts:
quote:
The NEP was billed as a nationalistic, fiscally responsible document. In reality, it was the biggest and most unfair tax grab in Canadian history.
For the first time, new federal tax royalties were imposed on all domestic production and exports alike.
Billions of dollars worth of these taxes were then unfairly diverted to Canadian-owned oil companies only in the form of exploration grants. Ottawa was turning the business into a system of political handouts. Worst of all, the feds expropriated without compensation a sizeable percentage of discoveries or future finds on leased lands retroactively. The U.S. Congress reacted angrily.
Back home in Alberta, tempers flared. Premier Peter Lougheed launched litigation that eventually struck down the export taxes and other regulations because they were illegal under the Constitution.
It's interesting to note that Ottawa was run by the same spendthrifts in charge of Canada today. |
quote:
Western oilmen turned to the Tory leader, Brian Mulroney, and his loosely structured coalition in the election of 1984. This alliance included alienated westerners, Ontario's "Big Blue" Progressive Conservatives and Quebec's nationalists willing to be federal Tories. Mulroney, elected in 1984, delivered to all factions.
Westerners were over-represented in his cabinet and Alberta's pet peeves were addressed: The NEP was gutted, oil and natural gas prices were deregulated, free trade with the U.S. was negotiated, Petro-Canada was privatized and foreign ownership restrictions were virtually eliminated.
The arrangement worked, until Mulroney and his Tories sold out the West. His cabinet diverted a multibillion-dollar maintenance contract to Bombardier in Montreal from Winnipeg's Bristol Aerospace after the western-based company had won the contract fair and square in a sealed-tender bidding process.
Immediately after that fiasco, Albertans and other westerners fled the Tories and turned to Reform leader Preston Manning.
And the rest, as they say, is history. |
So yes, Mulroney started his career off great by ditching the NEP, among other things.
Then he went and f*cked it all up. Thus the birth of the Reform party (Canadian Alliance) now.
quote:
But, these days, the Liberals' proudest accomplishments are the policies put forward back in 1993 by Reform: free trade, a balanced budget and a tougher stance toward Quebec separatists.
It's also interesting that two Albertans run the country's conservative parties: Manning and Tory Joe Clark. They are both attempting to stitch together a coalition, as Mulroney did, to unite the right and defeat the Liberals.
The jury's out on that one, but there's little doubt that Alberta's influence will continue to be disproportionate, thanks to its oil wealth and the aptitude of its citizens to fight against adversity and to bankroll their beliefs. |
quote:
What sort of leverage will you use to get Kyoto repealed if it's ratified? |
The way I see it, if he passes it, it could go two ways:
1) People all over Canada, especially Alberta and probably Ontario as well, will watch gas prices go through the roof, watch the price of their cars go through the roof, will watch their heating bills rise, will watch the GDP fall, and will watch the unemployment rate rise accordingly as many of the companies flee to the US. At which point, everyone will finally decide they're sick of the Liberal government and their perpetual screwups and try the Canadian Alliance on for size (who will campaign and win on the platform of ditching Kyoto). 
2) Referendum...
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Asher
|
|
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999
time: 22:19
|
|
I've found a poll from January 2001.
http://www.westernhomerule.ca/arguments.html
quote:
In late January of 2001, a COMPAS poll found that 43% of Albertans said they are growing less satisfied with the Canadian constitutional arrangement. No fewer than 47% said they want constitutional changes to limit Ottawa’s control over provincial government policy and on how much Ottawa can take from Alberta taxpayers. (Other polling has found that Saskatchewanians feel more alienated from Ottawa than any other province.)
On the other hand, the poll found that only 7% of Albertans would want to separate from Canada (as against 28% of Quebecers).
“Alberta has a great deal of frustration [with Ottawa],” Roger Gibbins, president of the Canada West Foundation, said at the time. “It boils up, but there’s no outlet.” |
So in January 2001, only 7% wanted to separate.
BUT
quote:
In July of 2001, an Ipsos-Reid poll found that the percentage of westerners who favor immediate separation from Canada was 11% (see preceding Item re 7% figure). On the other hand, 26% say they would favor separation in 10 years if the federal government doesn’t undergo a major facelift by then. |
Notice how the figure is steadily growing?
Right now most people are taking a "wait and see" approach. Mainly the next election. If the Liberals get in AGAIN, and Kyoto passes, the 47% "dissatisified" will most likely start leaning towards separation because it doesn't appear to be likely for anything to change.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Asher
|
|
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999
time: 22:19
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by KrazyHorse
Those figures seem to be what I thought they'd be. If it hits 30% I'll start to be worried, since we've lived with lot worse than that for the last 30 years. |
I wish Quebec would separate, and see how well they do without our transfer payments. Maybe then Canada could go unilingual too.
quote:
What particular constitutional changes do you feel would abate alienation? Would this be the one that gives every province equal number of seats in more powerful Senate, irrepective of population? Is there something else you feel would help? |
An equal number of seats in a more powerful Senate is a huge step in the right direction.
I believe there should also be a cap on per capita contribution to equalization payments. Right now there's far too much money leaving Alberta to fund the same provinces for decades on end which never show any signs of real improvement. It's really disheartening.
And I'd also support the ability for individual provinces to "opt out" of Kyoto.
quote:
By the way, I'm getting a little tired of you claiming that I've "thrown **** at you", given that I'm not a member of the government and have never voted for a ruling federal government's party. |
The government you support would be far worse for Alberta.
quote:
If it's lighthearted, then I'm fine with it (as my redneck Albertan comments are - well, usually  ), but I'm getting a bad vibe from you right now... |
Well, you tend to take the position of defending the government's action, and in doing so you've told me that you don't necessarily disagree with it.
And if you don't disagree with it, then you might as well agree with it and support it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000
time: 22:19
|
|
Oh Asher
The ideology of youth . . . quoting facts and figures about events you were never part of and passing judgements on things you have never experienced ( note: citing what your father has done does not help your arguments) . . . But there were several interesting points so I thought I would address a couple of things you said in the various threads and just make a few random observations as well
1. Do you realize how many people that live in Alberta come from other provinces and still have a strong emotional attachment to those provinces and would not like the idea of their frinds and families being in a separate country ?? I recently came here and I like the low taxes but ceasing to be Canadian I work at a firm with about 100 people in Calgary-- my rough estimate of the number that were born in Alberta would be less than 25 and I think thats typical-- do you seriously expect these people would abandon Canada over MONEY ???
2. Your arguments seem to be generally to the far right and ignore anything other than the financial aspects of things. For example, the main reason the BC offshore has not been developed (oil) has been environmental concerns while yopu seem to think it was some sort of leftist mismanagement. I'm no fan of the NDP but taking some care of the environment does not necessarily strike me as a bad thing
3. You are right on a number of things in this and the other thread-- Alberta does pay out a lot in transfers ( and its irrelevant whether its direct or indirect as you too argued over there) and a large reason that the eastern provinces lead the country in growth is the simple statistical fact that it is easier to have a greater percentage gain from a smaller economy.
4. However, to attribute Alberta's wealth to good government is somewhat misleading-- its easy to govern when there are billions in direct royalties coming in
5. To attribute some of the smaller percentages I have seen attribute to the oil and gas industry is again misleading. Apart from direct royalties there are the multitudes of spin-offs that come from having the industry headquartered in calgary-- I am a petroleum lawyer and if the oil and gas industry dries up here (hypothetical) then I doubt I would be here for long. . . Alberta is working hard at diversification but Calgary is still very much an oil town.
6. There are many things about Canadian transfer payments I do not like and the federal clawback as poorer provinces get ahead is one of them. For example, on Hibernia royalties the province loses something like 80 cents from transfers for every dollar of royalty receiver. Thats why the province is quite frankly not that interested in royalties on projects like Hibernia or the nickle mine in Labrador-- they get so little out of the royalties that they bargain them away for a few more jobs.
7. All your arguments seem based on money and a country and the issues they face are much more than that. Its all well and good to debate transfer payments and tax rates but when the reality of an unemployment statistic is a 53 year old fisherman, who after 35 years in an industry working back breaking hours, faces having to move from his town of 200 . . . unable to sell his house etc because the fishery has collapsed. . . . well lets just say its not an easy decision-- then to have some 18 year old silver-spoon Albertan kid assume he is LAZY-- not good
8. Other provinces share rants at the federal government. The Chrestien administration seems tired and old. But more generally , I know in newfoundland there is a general feeling that the fishery gets short shrift and was bartered away to to foreigners in deals designed to help Ontario and Quebec industry.
9 Statistics do often reflect the truth-- Newfoundland is booming or more accurately, St. John's and area is booming while smaller fishing communities are still hurting . . So the economy is a bit of a contradiction with clear winners and losers.
Thats all for now. I could have gone through that other fourteen page thread and responded to more stuff but I just wanted to say that I'm encouraged to see a young person with so much interest in the future of this country. I just wonder if your attitudes will be so cut and dried 10 years from now , particularly if you or Alberta face economic hardship. because when I listen to you Asher, I hear facts and figures and " its our oil" but I never hear anything about what a country or a province is other than the MONEY. I hope my country will always be more than that. AS for you, perhaps you will emigrate to the States as , after all, pay is higher and taxes are lower.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19.
Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-06-2002 14:02
|