 |
|
The Dark Lord
|
|
If you will have me (and if this party is still active) I will join. I want nothing more than to see our civilization elevated above all others, using whatever methods work best.
~THE DARK LORD APOLON
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Trip
Unlike other parties, our goal is not to destroy the world, destroy the political system, or destroy our opponents |
May I ask, is this still true? Is this party really not a party at all, and does not have party politics?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Robber Baron
|
 |
Commonwealth of Commonsense
Jun 2002 time: 00:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tassadar5000
May I ask, is this still true? Is this party really not a party at all, and does not have party politics? |
Well, my own personal take on this aspect of our creed is that we Imperialists are a party insofar as we are offering a way to unite and focus political action among likeminded people ....
But not a party that adheres to a dogmatic platform or a rigid game strategy. Not war for war's sake (the Hawks?), nor determined to turtle and build as soon as we gain territory (DIA?) We are pragmatists, we want to remain flexible, we seek an end (expansion) aand are ready to employ many means (war, to be sure, but also building, technical advancement, cultural conquest ...) to accomplish that end.
Again, just my opinion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Donal Graeme
excuse me, but what does this 3A2C3 thing stand for? An acronym, and how is it connected to the Imperialist party? |
The 3A2C3 is the abbreviation for the Association of Apolytonians Against a Constitution (AAAC), a group formed from civman2000, me and numerous others in the Civ2 Democratic game as opposition to having a long-winded Constitution. When this forum was started, the party was ported over here as the AAAC for Civ3, or AAACC3, or 3A2C3 (geddit? ). Early on (before the game here had started), there was the proposition of a merger between the 3A2C3 and the Imperialists (Trip's party).
Whilst I was away it seems the merger happened, and several other parties joined in to make the UFC (United Front Coalition, IIRC). This party somehow encompassed the policies of all its' constitutents, but I do not see this for the 3A2C3. As a co-founder of this "party" I guess I am obliged to stay a member of it (civman2000 has since found his ideas best represented by the DIA - Democratic Industrialists of Apolytonia, the other large party), but I may have to reassess the union with the UFC. Or disband the party entirely if I am the only member (especially if I want to be a Justice... ). I have found myself alternately disagreeing with both DIA and UFC, so I guess a strict party policy is not really my scene. (Did I just say that?!?! )
Or, I guess that since originally our one top priority was to oppose long-winded Constitutions, the 3A2C3 is kinda like the Anarchists.... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Dark Lord
|
|
Greetings from the Lord of Evil.
I am already a member, of course, but I feel we must try to do something to make our party more 'high profile.' We don't seem to be known that well, and our coalition with the Hawks as the UFC seems to leave us in their shadow. Warmongers.
Anyway, I feel that we must try to reach out to more people in order to expand our power...and we must make ourselves known. The DIA is not a coalition... why do we have to be in one? We must attempt to reduce the massive number of independents out there....
P.S. Which city is primarily under control of the Imperialists/UFC? I would suppose it would be Trip's city of Termina...
~TDL Apolon
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|