 |
| |
|
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999
time: 23:20
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by vulture
I notice that some people chose not to attack Japan early on. This puzzles me somewhat, so I'm curious as to the reasoning. Was it a conscious decision to wait for later, or just a lack of decision to go to war?
For me it was pretty clear cut. Japan had horses and wines (that I wanted) in its territory. It hadn't yet connected the horses up to the net. So it had no good units. This game *has* to be won militarily, so I'll have to fight Japan at some point. It'll be worse if they get iron, and far worse if they're still an issue when Samurai appear on the scene. Plus the possibility of an early great leader, and the chance to add some developed cities to my empire. For me, absolutely everything screamed 'kill Japan now', and waiting appeared worse in every respect.
So, were other games sufficiently different that early that a different strategy appeared good, or were there other more important factors that I decided to gloss over? (Like building up infrastructure) |
I was able to expand aggressively enough (and/or Japan had enough problems expanding) that I ended up with two sources of horses (one halfway across the continent) and one of iron within my borders. That left me with no need to fight an early war to secure resources, and building infrastructure helped me get the technology needed to build riders that much earlier.
And considering what riders can do against technologically inferior opponents, it made more sense to me to wait. If I built archers or swordsmen for an early war, even the ones that didn't die would be essentially wasted production because they would be obsolete the moment I had riders. Riders can move so much faster that the older units simply could not keep up with the front lines. (And that fast movement, coupled with excellent survivability and a golden age, gets wars over with quickly, which is immensely valuable to a republic that fears war weariness.)
Horsemen would be obsolete the moment a rival got pikemen (which I didn't realize would never happen - I think I saw one in Japan, definitely not more, and none at all in Egypt), and while in theory they can be upgraded, in practice I didn't want to put that kind of dent in my science budget. And horsemen still couldn't generally keep up with riders striking from one city to the next in a single turn.
There is also one other, more subtle nuance involved. I was competing not just with my rivals on my own continent but also against rivals overseas. If I crippled my neighbors early, they couldn't do as much of my researching for me. By trading aggressively with Japan and Egypt and leaving them intact until my research outstripped theirs enough that the value of their contributions was negligible, I put myself in a stronger technological position relative to the other continent. Similarly, building libraries a lot earlier than I could have done had I gotten in early wars helped my technolgy relative to the other continent. (So, for that matter, did my almost zero cost of military unit upkeep until I was ready to fight.) The net result is that had I not arbitrarily restricted myself from going after the other continent with pre-industrial units, I very likely could have achieved domination by 1000 AD by continuing to build hoardes of riders, upgrading to cavalry when available, and slicing through that continent long before it even came close to having the technology to stop me. As it is, I'll wait for more modern units to slice through technologically backward opponents with an overwhelming force.
Nathan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Taking it from the other angle, the reason I fought so early was that, I had all these cities up and running, cheap barracks, a close opponent who I was already out-researching....he was in my way. Add to that the fact that if I wanted to attack Japan and be a ruthless dog, then Egypt had to go as well, and had to be gone before the outside world discovered my little love fest.
With four cities up and running very quickly, I had 16 free slots for troops. Slots that represented "potential energy." If I built troops to occupy those free slots, I could turn that potential energy into actual energy, and building troops would accomplish the same kinna thing that building settlers accomplished (expansion of the empire)....'cept I could do both...build troops while I waited for my cities to grow, interspersing it with settlers when they DID grow.
The destructive power of a band of archers striking in the early game is so far out of proportion to their cost that it's just silly.
This is because each city represents a certain amout of "potential energy" as well. The longer you have it, the more it does for you.
By stripping rivals of cities in the early, EARLY BC years, you not only springboard your own growth (capturing cities you would simply not have had the pop points to build yourself), but you absolutely WRECK your neighbors' long term potential. That's a punishing two-edged sword, and one of the reasons that the "cost" of three archers is still a LOT less than the "cost" of a Temple....even tho the number of shields for both might be the same.
-=Vel=-
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
nbarclay
|
|
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999
time: 23:20
|
|
Once my Beijing going as a settler pump, it would have been wasteful to use it for anything else. It could grow as quickly as it could produce a worker or a settler, so there was no time in between to build even warriors much less archers. (Of course once I had fully expanded and had a satisfactory number of workers, I shifted the city's focus.) With Beijing otherwise occupied, building an adequate number of archers for an early attack would have been a slower process for me than it would for someone who used Beijing differently.
Of course if I'd gotten a settler instead of barbarians from that first hut, the situation would have been quite different. Not only would I have had the free second city, but the first settler I built myself would have come earlier. Under those conditions, I almost certainly would have done a little damage to Japan in an early war. As it is, I seriously considered an early attack with archers and even laid some of the groundwork, but when I discovered Literature, I decided libraries made more sense.
Incidentally, if I had launched an early attack, it would have been with limited goals, and I would have done it in such a way as not to mess up my reputation. I agree that a short war early to cripple a rival's expansion can be good strategy, but all it takes (barring bad luck) is one short and relatively inexpensive war to accomplish that goal.
Nathan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Preface
The idea of a domination game that climaxes with a WW3-like bang would be a blast to play, but this scenario wasn't going to get many of us there. The only way to go at it seemed to be Nathan's, which is to artificially hold back from winning when you can, so as to win when we discussed doing so. I would have tried this, but realized that there still wouldn't be a WW3, because the AI would be as far behind as if... you were invading with cavalry and they had pikemen and musketmen. Holding myself back just to kick around the AI with superior units didn't seem worth it. So I just played this domination game to win, as best I could.
1450 BC: Can't beat the archer rush
Taking advantage of the fertile starting territory, China built one settler factory and four cities with barracks to pump out archers. In 1450, five archers attacked Japan. Pausing only once for reinforcements, the Chinese archers destroyed the Japanese horse city, took two others, and finally accepted peace, gaining two techs.
950 BC: Slow-motion oscillation.
Egypt was too far to attack in an optimal strategy of oscillation, so China now began to build up a force of horsemen to join its archers and attack Egypt. The Chinese set their strategy for all time: build only barracks and temples, only enough defensive units to garrison large and conquered towns, and research only when close to the three techs it considered crucial to global domination: monarchy, chivalry and military tradition. This early, China saved all of its gold for the temples it would need to rush later, and grew to 13 cities by 550 BC.
Then China destroyed three Egyptian cities in a first strike with a force of horsemen and archers. The Egyptians had only a few war chariots with which to fight back, and collapsed undr the onslaught. Despite waiting unusually long to fight again, the bigger Egyptian towns were still too far away, and there was nothing to be gained from the war besides crippling Egypt and extorting tech. China proceeded to do this, and shrugged when the Japan allied itself with Egypt.
In 430 BC, the Japanese surrendered again, losing one of its two cities, and giving China two techs. Egypt made peace soon after, in 330 BC, ceding two cities and two more techs.
330 BC: The drive to monarchy and the Middle Ages.
China now had 1736 gold, and the continental tech lead... which was not a good thing, given its lack of one library or marketplace. Egypt could have been kept vibrant enough to research either monotheism or feudalism. China started to build the Great Lighthouse, with the hope of discovering other lands to conquer, and sent out more settlers to fill in some of the vast empty areas still remaining in the continent. It also built more horsemen for the conquest of those legendary far-off lands. China's wise men discovered monarchy in 110 AD, and reached the Middle Ages one hundred years later.
Over the next 500 years, China fought Japan and then Egypt, gaining a few cities, building up its horsemen and, after researching chivalry, riders. Progress was steady, but nothing like what it would have been if its wars had produced even one Great Leader. The lack of a FP made corruption a seemingly permanent fact of life over all but the core of the empire. Our relative lack of progress bottomed out with the news that America had built the Great Lighthouse in 430, three turns ahead of China's projected opening ceremonies.
490 AD: The discovery of a new world.
In 490, the ocean-crossing Americans established the city of New Orleans on our continent, and the pressure built for the Chinese to find a way to transport their mounted legions across the water. China established (furious) relations with the five other civs in 520.
The end of another unfair war with Egypt got China two cities and a tech; with this boost, China acquired astronomy, and began to upgrade its galleys to caravels. Given its closeness, average size and conflict with neighboring France, America would be where China would establish its beachhead.
The last Japanese city fell in 580, and the elite horsemen were told that, instead of being upgraded, they would be entrusted with the steady destruction of Egypt.
730 AD: D Day of d Riders.
In 730, twelve Riders landed in the mountains outside New York. The next turn, New York was razed,and the Chinese Golden Age began. One turn later, a Chinese city sprang up on the new continent, on the luxury-rich coast of former New York. The Americans had only pike and longbow for defense - their fate was sealed. The Chinese lured Germany into the war with 60 gold, and waited for reinforcements. It also began to plot how to research the technology that would be required to conquer the bulk of the new continent.
China researched music theory, built Bach's on the home continent on the structure of the abandoned Lighthouse, and traded the tech for invention, gunpowder and chemistry. It then sold all of its luxuries for the cash to research metallurgy and military tradition.
This process was helped by the birth of its first GL in 850. This momentous event led to the building of a new city in the heart of the collapsing American empire, with the long-awaited FP. The FP and instant temples kept American flips down to one, and no razings after New York. Chinese industrial output exploded in the newly conquered land, and peace with America came in 950... ten years after the end of the Golden Age. America had been pushed to the far corner of the continent, and would die out soon after, at the hands of the English.
970 AD: Military tradition and the fall of France.
Next up was France, whose borders ran up along that of the former America. Every French city was defended by musketeers. The day of the rider had passed with the Golden Age, but China's synchronized efforts continued to advance smoothly. In 970, the Chinese learned the secrets of the military tradition ahead of the rest of the world. Once again, its specialized research arm was shut down. Its army consisted of 30 cavalry and 14 elite riders, as well as the 8 horsemen finishing off Egypt. The blitzkrieg garnered China seven French cities by 1010. After some consolidation, the French fell in 1140.
Russia was small enough to be an afterthought. Its pikes and longbows couldn't keep it from vanishing in three turns. Peace left Russia with one city at the far end of the continent.
1140 AD: End game against Germany and England.
Victory also left China with two GLs. It was too late to bother with the military small wonders - both became cavalry armies, leading the bold dual invasion of Germany and England. Germany had a couple of cavalry and knights, but England had a decent, growing cavalry. China took them on jointly because of a fear that its window to domination would close with the coming of nationalism.
Half of Germany - including Berlin - had fallen by 1220, and the wily Chinese struck a generous peace, the better to focus on England.
China took three more English cities, and stopped with the fall of London. Its cavalry was grossly over-extended, the English were threatening its southern (German) flank, and culture-flipping was a real problem with the English. When England entered the industrial age in 1270, Germany accepted peace in exchange for one far-off city.
China knew it was tantalizingly close to domination. Germany gave the Chinese a ROP for two luxuries. China started to line up its mounted units for one glorious stab in the back that would take all four German cities in one turn. And then - most anti-climactically - as two Chinese settlers filled in empty land with new cities (and yet another English city reverted), Chinese domination of the globe was acknowledged in 1285.
The conquerors had built Bach's Cathedral, the Forbidden Palace, and one cathedral (by default). Other than the pacifying temples, every shield and piece of gold went into the creation of the soldiers that conquered the world.
Postscript
To achieve true WW3-like invasions with a credible AI response, it may have made more sense to say that no intercontinental invasions are allowed until 1950. This would allow at least one AI civ to stock up on MI and bombers, and make more of a game of it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
I'm attaching my game at 750 AD: the invasion of America.
 Attachment: mao tourney, 750 ad.sav
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
And here is my game just before I won in 1285.
Attachment: mao tourney, 1280 ad.sav
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Alexman:
What happened in your game?
I'm always interested in the details of fast starts. How did you research your way to the Middle Ages so quickly, apart from the slider being at 100%? Lots of cities? Libraries? I haven't played at Monarch in ages until the two current tourneys, but building cavalry in 830 with only the locals to share tech with seems very fast.
Jshelr:
It sounds like your early game ran into the same problem I did, despite your patience: that any sort of war left the continent full of barbs. I think the catch lies in that our continent was almost big enough for four civs. Expanding properly was probably trickier than anyone expected. From this perspective, Alexman did it best in fighting no wars in the ancient era, since there was plenty of room to expand, and it allowed him the chance to quickly research his way through the ages.
Vel:
It sounds like you hit the Daily Double... not with your start, but by conquering your continent BC while building a global tech lead. You had your cake, and ate it, too. Nice going. And yeah, weren't the barbs a *****? I resorted to the same solution.
On a lighter note, I kept wondering why I couldn't wipe out Japan, Egypt and Russia... they respawned! I'm not sure I prefer that option when I'm ruinning a no-culture operation.
Sir Ralph:
Did you run into the "didn't think I'd do all the research" problem until you made contact with the second continent? Again, it was a tough game to know which way to commit.
Nathan:
You seem to have hit the Middle Ages first - did you basically build cities and libraries throughout the ancient age? This seems like a high-risk, high-reward approach to what you had identified as your overall scenario strategy. After that, your flood of GLs was the epitaph for the other civs, if one was needed. Something I found interesting is that your tech progress settled into normal mode around the time you contacted the other civs - in other words, your blistering Republic-by-550BC pace had slowed down. Any idea why? (I reviewed your republic map - you actually made it by 350 BC, about the same as the other smart guys.)
Vulture:
For a slow start, you made up ground fast... sort of the opposite of some other players, since you all seem to have finished at around the same time.
I've used the "make an offer" ploy, and found it to work often.
The slow AI tech question:
I recall passing the AI on tech in good Monarch games early in the Middle Ages, so I'm not too surprised that good players did better... out of context. But to do better in the ancient era on the less-settled continent is downright weird, and Vel may have a point about barb activity. Nathan's research strategy obviously works well on Monarch, but not this well.
Olaf:
Very nice adjustment with the longbows, and your wonder building is impressive. How much production did your capital have, with so many temp cities within its radius?
Jawa:
Were you researching while oscillating? Because the latter sounds flawless, but you advanced relatively slowly.
Last edited by Txurce on 29-06-2002 at 12:04
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Theseus, as you can see, I felt like reading and writing tonight. Somebody shoot me before I post again.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Theseus
|
 |
The warmonger formerly known as rpodos. Gathering Storm! Apolyton Spirit!!
Apr 2002
time: 00:20
|
|
Txurce, I am so impressed. That's one of the most aggressive games I know of.
I'm about to pass out, so I'll keep it short.
Great start, and great land to expand too (i.e., the whole continent).
WWF Smackdown on Japan. Left'em with two cities.
Massive Horsemen build-up, while also settling and building. Egypt grows equally massive, but with minimal resources has a crap military. Tokyo (still Jap) somehow builds Great Lighthouse.
Around 750AD, two major events:
1) The first long-range Galley finds the island SE of the other continent, and shortly thereafter, the English.
2) The Greater Chinese Co-Prosperity Expansion takes place.. Mao elects the "Arrian Deception," and 'deletes' all evidence of the Japanese and the Egyptians. Went at it with appr. 50 Riders... indomitable, especially against Spears, WCs, and Archers. Actually, a very fun race to kill them off before any of the distant civs know of Chinese atrocities. Successful.
[Sidenote #1: I had stockpiled appr. 40 Horsemen for Rider upgrades... that's a lot of coin.]
[Sidenote #2: Interesting new move: Given the isolation of the home continent, when meeting the distant civs I IMMEDIATELY paid for an embassy, so that they could not, preventing them from knowing the location and status of Beijing.]
[Sidenote #3: Unlike most of the other games described here, the massive attack on Egypt produced enough GLs... I took'em down in less then 150 years, which was massive... FP at Thebes, Army, Sistine. BTW, razed almost everything. Also, a complete bastard, depending on the Arrian D.]
Next, the settler race... fill out the continent before any of the distant civs can gain a foothold. Successful.
Like JJ, I'm cheating on the thread a little, in that I haven't actually reached Industrial, but I do know the whole map.
I am on the way to UP (tm). I have fully settled the continent, with 47 cities, and a well-placed FP... England is the leader on the other continent, with much land but only 18 cities. I'm just short of tech parity. I have so much resource trade $ coming in it's embarassing.
It looks scary on the mini-map... if I were playing England, say, and found a killer AI civ like I look now, I'd start sending Aeson gifts, asking for help.
My long-term plan is (maybe was) to take over the world in one fell swoop, but I may not bother... I'm with Txurce, this game is a foregone conclusion.
Last thought: England is being run by the dove party in the Demo game.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Theseus, three items of note in your post:
First, the last-minute rewriting of the history books for the benefit of the Europeans, so that they'll think that big continent only had one people who seemingly bred like bunnies.
Second, establishing embassies first, so those same Europeans won't know where the bunny hutch is located.
Third, the decision to raze, which bore fruit since you were able to fill up the land, with nary a Euro city in sight.
Great, very different game. Post a save when you get a chance.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Theseus, I don't know if you saw my posts a while back on my use of the ultra-early archer rush, but one of its aspects is trying to juggle a few balls at once. Since my overall goal is not Ultimate Domination but to win asap, pausing in a domination game for any reason is to be avoided. The current tourney game led me into a less-than-optimal decision, which was to persist with a normal early archer rush. Even though I modified it by keeping a fifth city as a settler factory, the reality is that this unusual map allowed for extraordinarily large peaceful expansion (which can be seen in Nathan's amp, as well as elsewhere). That would have been a smarter starting strategy for me, since it took me a lot longer than most to research chivalry. On the other hand, my progress once I encountered the other continent - about 500 AD - was the sort that I look for with this very fundamentalist strategy.
Let me know how to put together a zip file, here or by PM, and I'll follow suit.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nbarclay
|
|
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999
time: 23:20
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Txurce
Nathan:
You seem to have hit the Middle Ages first - did you basically build cities and libraries throughout the ancient age? This seems like a high-risk, high-reward approach to what you had identified as your overall scenario strategy. After that, your flood of GLs was the epitaph for the other civs, if one was needed. Something I found interesting is that your tech progress settled into normal mode around the time you contacted the other civs - in other words, your blistering Republic-by-550BC pace had slowed down. Any idea why? (I reviewed your republic map - you actually made it by 350 BC, about the same as the other smart guys.) |
Yes, my focus was on cities and libraries (and courthouses in my most distant cities, since libraries in corrupt cities aren't worth much). There was some risk involved in neglecting my military so much, but from what little experience I have with this type of game, I don't think the risk was too great. I was high on the power graph, and there weren't AI forces wandering through my territory where an undefended city right next to them could prove to be an irresistable temptation.
I think my pace through the middle ages was pretty solid, but keep in mind that I picked up all but two of the optional techs and made the transition to Democracy along the way. That's about a 14-turn detour just for Printing Press, Democracy, and the anarchy of the transition. Alexman got to the industrial era earlier, but he's still in a Republic, and if he wants to switch to Democracy (I don't know whether he'll consider it worthwhile or not), he'll have to either research Printing Press and Democracy himself or wait for the AIs to do it. So I'm not unhappy with the pace I set. (Strictly from a "winning fast" perspective, I likely would have done better staying in Republic, but one of my goals is to have the entire continent be at least marginally productive if possible, and the corruption benefit of Democracy should help with that.)
Also keep in mind that past a certain point, "normal mode" for good players if all goes well is four turns per tech. Game rules make it physically impossible to do better than that unless the AIs do your research for you, so in the industrial age, my blistering tech pace has transformed into a blistering rush-buying pace (probably averaging 500 plus surplus gold per turn and peaking at over 900).
By the way, I'm up to 1270 AD and have about a seven-tech lead at the moment (thanks partly to ToE). Germany made Communism about as high a priority as I could have hoped for, so police stations in distant cities have recently become high on my list of things to buy with my excess gold.
Nathan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Nathan, the detour to democracy would indeed explain why you eased up. Is switching to democracy from republic worth it, given that I assume you intend to switch back when you apply the Final Solution? The best way to do this might be to stick with democracy until your people revolt, and enter anarchy organically en route to monarchy, communism, or whatever you choose as your war government.
Are you more or less averaging a tech every four turns with a 500 gpt surplus? If so, I would say your Chinese engine is running on all sixteen cylinders.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nbarclay
|
|
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999
time: 23:20
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Txurce
Nathan, the detour to democracy would indeed explain why you eased up. Is switching to democracy from republic worth it, given that I assume you intend to switch back when you apply the Final Solution? The best way to do this might be to stick with democracy until your people revolt, and enter anarchy organically en route to monarchy, communism, or whatever you choose as your war government. |
Me, PLAN to switch from Democracy just for a piddling little war? People in a Democracy are quite tolerant of wars that swallow entire nations (aside from the odd far-away city or two) in two or three or four turns. I won't say that it's impossible that a particularly nasty combination of MPPs coupled with unexpectedly heavy losses could cause problems, but if all goes according to plan, this war (or, depending on how things go, series of short wars) will be a cakewalk.
I'm just about the ultimate blitzer: I come at the AI with everything I have and keep coming. And in the era of railroads, when "everything I have" is largely modern armor and mech inf, while all the enemy has is infantry and maybe the odd tank or panzer or two, that doesn't exactly make for long wars. (I won't bother with aircraft or artillery because they can't keep up!)
quote:
Are you more or less averaging a tech every four turns with a 500 gpt surplus? If so, I would say your Chinese engine is running on all sixteen cylinders. |
It's definitely firing on all sixteen cylinders. My surplus varies quite a bit depending on what tech I'm on - I even had a deficit one turn out of four researching Atomic Theory so I could use ToE to get Electronics and Radio - but at the moment I'm averaging a 600+ surplus researching Refining. (I haven't actually played any more since my last post.)
Nathan
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Txurce
|
|
Santa Monica CA USA
Mar 1999
time: 05:20
|
|
Nathan, would you post a save of this sixteen-cylinder machine in action when you get a chance?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nbarclay
|
|
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999
time: 23:20
|
|
Well, I finally muddled my way through the industrial era and launched my first intercontinental strike shortly after getting Computers. Three turns after my landing, America is no more. If I were running England, France, Germany, or Russia, I'd be worrying right about now. 
I'm enclosing a save from the turn of the landing just before I hit the American city on North Island (which I could take the same turn my troops landed everywhere else). A total of nineteen transports were involved in the strike, although the two that hit South Island each had just five units (since I didn't expect much opposition there).
Now I wait to get Modern Armor to conquer the rest of the world. But I have my two extra luxuries, and I have my staging area, and that's what I needed.
Nathan
Attachment: invasion america - 1410 ad.sav
This has been downloaded 0 time(s).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jshelr
|
 |
pittsburgh
Apr 2002
time: 00:20
|
|
Looking at the replay after the game, Japan got off to a very slow start. I wonder if the barbarians were especially hard on them early.
Txurce's Postscript
To achieve true WW3-like invasions with a credible AI response, it may have made more sense to say that no intercontinental invasions are allowed until 1950. This would allow at least one AI civ to stock up on MI and bombers, and make more of a game of it.
(He's right, of course. The postscript is essentially what I did. I held back until they got the tech to fight reasonably evenly. It was interesting in a way, and my report's below.)
Major Findings:
„« I think the slow research question probably indicates that the Euro civs had been constantly at war for 6000 years.
„« You Can Use RoP to Improve Invasion Mobility
„« Enemy MI Require Attacking Civ to Far Outnumber Defenders, Radar Artillery Makes Attacking Much Harder
„« The AI Civs Often Implode in the Modern Era -- They Did This Time
„« The Combined Arms Technique That Works Best Is MA Blitz Preceded By Nukes
Scenario: Having cleared Cleo from the large continent, I had fringe settlements from America and the UK. I was waiting for the AI to acquire all the military hardware to make things interesting: nukes, MA, MI, radar artillery. There was a trapped panzer on my continent.
China was the dominant economy and by far the largest civ, protected except for these fringe cities by water and ahead on tech. If I can't win this one, it's time to go back to golf.
Researched all the way to integrated defense and built the missile defense small wonder. I did this so the AI civs would have enough time to build up a decent defensive force. Had about 50 ICBMs.
Two four-unit vet MI armies, two settlers, and 15 transport loads of MA were ready to go at the Chinese city closest to the American coast.
Step one: made right of passage agreement with France.
Step two: launched invasion, covered by 10 battleships and two carriers with a destroyer out front. (Ridiculous overkill for this game.)
Got three turns into the trip to France when Joan and Bismark declared war on America. I was then lucky enough to be one turn from landing on the mountain on America's upper coastline. So, since I didn't want to wait several turns while Bismark and Joan carved up Abe, I landed the whole stack on the mountain.
BTW, I think landing on mountains from the ocean should be fixed. It's too powerful and too unreallistic.
With the two armies of MI the stack was virtually invulnerable, even without artillery. I had omitted artillery since the RoP with France was designed to make this a multi-target blitz war where artillery would just be drag.
At this point, I took out the US cities on China's homeland, although one was a two turn effort because the city could not be reached by MA in one turn. It had a tactical nuke in it!!!!
Then I got a big gift because England declared war on me. This let me stay in Democracy for a long time in the coming war. They only had one city in China which disappeared immediately.
Abe was busy elsewhere and just left the stack alone. It took three turns to eat through the mech infantry defenses and overcome some geography limits in the American invasion. I was amazed that neither Bismark or Joan took anything.
Set up the airport on the second turn and started pumping in reinforcements as they were built on the home continent. Also, it was just 10 tiles from China to America, so I parked several battleships half way and made a safe passage for transports.
Aeson's recycling blitz tactic works great. BTW it delivers a foreign national as the settler. So, there may be a flip risk if you leave the new city unoccupied. (For those who missed it, Aeson's tactic is to sell improvements in captured cities for both shields and gold. This allows the accumulated shields to immediately build a settler. On the first turn after capture, you abandon the city and use the new settler to build a fresh one. This ability requires researching recycling or buying it from the AI.)
The US war got me all I needed, including additional luxuries. England is at war with France and Germany. I back off a bit and build more MA for a few turns.
When I'm ready to go, I try to use Bismark's stranded tank on the home continent to make him declare war on me. That does not work, since the program does not give me the option of telling him that he's in my territory. Not sure what happened there. Does the program recognize there is no way for Bismark to remove the tank.? He could still disband it.
Anyway, failing that ploy, I planted a few spys in France. Joan cheerfully killed them all, but would not declare war.
Bismark missed the spy entirely. His army was not impressive, underweighted in MA and overweighted in MI. I wondered at the small number of nukes. The reason turned out to be the AI had been in nuclear war for some time. Cities had been hit and completely cleaned up by the time my MA arrived on the scene.
So, China proceeds to batter cities in a steady blitz of the continent. The AI nuke war left many cities relatively weak and probably crippled their ability to build units rapidly. I took most cities out in standard fashion with no bombardment. MA attrition was significant. I think it takes about 15 MA to take out a metropolis defended by five MI. You will lose about five MA knocking hit points off the five MI. The next five MA will usually win. The last five can clean up any stragglers and provide a few healthy survivors to defend. Judged by the times I ran into them, if the city has a stack of radar artillery and, say, 10 MI defenders, it would take a huge number of attacking MA to win.
There were a few healthy cities where I proceeded the attack by dropping a nuke. In a close fight with limited attacking resources, this would be the only way to blitz successfully. It degrades the defenders significantly -- BUT IT ALSO SCREWS UP THE RAIL NETWORK.
It is interesting to note that nuking makes me sick. I will, however, cheerfully raze a captured city completely. Strange.
I found very little use for artillery or airplanes on offense. MA move too fast. Nukes are much more powerful at softening up.
In conclusion, SR's idea remains a good one. Maybe someone should volunteer to post a saved game when he comes naturally upon a situation where a moderan era war/invasion looks necessary and of uncertain outcome. Then we could all play it out.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.
Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
28-06-2002 21:10
|