 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
Hmmm. Will either of you pay attention to the fact that an adherent of Jupiter and Mars is among us (you)?
I don't care what colour. I don't care about the civ name. I don't care about the UU. Beer and M&Ms must be served! |
Ok.....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:20
|
|
Thanks. I have an alter even.
/Edit. Errrm... That's an altar. Too bad there is no Roman god of spelling. I could use one.
Last edited by notyoueither on 07-07-2002 at 09:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt
Why bother with amendments? The Constitution is there to stop ppl doing things by accident or design where they shouldn't. If the Historian, Ministers etc have control over their respective areas of influence (which they DO), then there is not a restriction on how they run that area. Thus, a Historian can name a co-Historian, Scribes, whatever, similar to how it is being discussed that Ambassadors can be named by the Foreign Minister.
Plus it's Historian. No-one will be miffed if there're two. Think common sense - not necessarily Constitution-bound. |
hi ,
, imagine if every minister start to name five aides , ....and Trip a complet joint chiefs of staff , ....there has to be a limit somewhere , ...
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by panag
hi ,
nope , but read the above post , ...
have a nice day |
I have. But you say that we must impose a limit on all positions, including Historian. But why? Historian does not make important decisions, and having two won't do that much damage as it would in say, a SMC position.
I mean, for most of the first term you didn't even have a historian but no one really seemed to notice. If you are truely equating historian to president, then you should've been one complaining as I'm sure you would if the president stopped posting.
But you did not. Why? Because again, the President position is more important than the historian position.
This post was not directed towards anyone, nor was it ment to offend anyone.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tassadar5000
I have. But you say that we must impose a limit on all positions, including Historian. But why? Historian does not make important decisions, and having two won't do that much damage as it would in say, a SMC position.
I mean, for most of the first term you didn't even have a historian but no one really seemed to notice. If you are truely equating historian to president, then you should've been one complaining as I'm sure you would if the president stopped posting.
But you did not. Why? Because again, the President position is more important than the historian position.
This post was not directed towards anyone, nor was it ment to offend anyone. |
hi ,
ahem , where did panag wrote that there was a limit on historians , .....
what panag wrote is this ; unless there is some control , very soon every office and job is going to have more people then there are citizens , ....
imagine we have 10 historians , ......
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tassadar5000
You wrote this:
I may be misunderstanding, could you please clarify what you meant by this? |
hi ,
okay , listen the picture should be clear by now , ...
> there should be a limit on the number of government places , ....otherwise we gonna have 300 jobs for 250 people , ....
and yes there should be a limit on historians , when they are with four , or ten , that can only get things more conplicated , one , even two , yes , but lets say four , nope that is a bit to large , ...
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Verto

|
|
quote: Originally posted by panag
hi ,
okay , listen the picture should be clear by now , ...
> there should be a limit on the number of government places , ....otherwise we gonna have 300 jobs for 250 people , ....
and yes there should be a limit on historians , when they are with four , or ten , that can only get things more conplicated , one , even two , yes , but lets say four , nope that is a bit to large , ...
have a nice day |
No need for more than 1 or 2 historians, because - no offense to any - but what does a historian have to do that requires so many?
"Don't use two heads when one will do."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Verto
They can very easily become competing with each other over who gets to cover what, how much each gets to write, so forth.
Although a coup de'tat over historian would be humorous... |
Or they could write together without conflict. That is also a possibility.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Verto
True, of course. Although a coup would sell more papers. |
Yeah. And considering how were charging a buck a paper....It would be more profitable as well. (Kidding, of course)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
How big of a document at the end of the game do we expect to have (Assuming the game goes into the modern age)?
How in-depth will you guys as historians go?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sheik
How big of a document at the end of the game do we expect to have (Assuming the game goes into the modern age)? |
This cannot be determined considering still in the ancient era.
quote: How in-depth will you guys as historians go? |
Although I cannot speak for my co historian, I will try to go into as much detail as possible without making it confusing for the reader.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|