 |
Who should lead an hypotetical Latin-american civ?
This poll is closed. |
| Pancho Villa |
   |
0 |
0% |
| King Pedro |
   |
1 |
7.14% |
| Simón Bolivar |
   |
9 |
64.29% |
| José San Martín |
   |
1 |
7.14% |
| Fidel Castro |
   |
3 |
21.43% |
| None of them |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
14 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
asadelta
|
|
coimbra,portugal
Aug 2002 time: 05:20
|
|
you don´t have shortages because you import food from other coutries
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Odd
|
|
São Paulo Brazil
Apr 2002 time: 02:20
|
|
A "Brazilian civilization" should be expansionist and religious. That would explain how we manage well political instability and the frequent gov. changes, we can do it in only one turn! Or if you could have new traits from PTW, we would have a totally different corruption system: the closest a city is from it's capital, the more corruption it gets!
UU? Something to think about... our army's main purpose was to repress rebellions and unrest. A settler with 2 mov. points maybe?
The monarchy party is not something serious, and about selling our improvments to global corporations, that money was pulverized at the black hole called "national debt", that's US$200.000.000.000,00
Brasília, the capital, is a desert of concret built over an arid land (not jungle, as far as I know) at an insane high cost. But dont want more controversy here.
A joke to those who believe that Brazil had no impact upon the world: wait till we finish off Amazon...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Craftsman
|
 |
São Leopoldo, RS - Brazil
Feb 2001 time: 02:20
|
|
Aro:
Hey!!! Extremely nice to see a famous brazilian around this Civ3 forums!! Wow! A famous brazilian citizen that is also a Civ3 player! Incredible...
yellfromhell:
You do have a hell of a knowledge about History! Congratulations! I was instantly glued to this thread after reading your first post! Cool!
You said that there are two territory constests among Brazil and Uruguay. I thought that it was only one, and that Brazil had already given away the land to Uruguay. What do you know about this? Land for peace, my friend!
GhengisFarb:
American vs. Chinese - I saw the movie "Spy Games" a short time ago, and definitely Americans are painting the Chinese Civ as being the Bad Guy of the moment (well, at least one of them... ). Just like it was with the splitted (remember Civ2? ) USSR during the Cold War. BTW, I have nothing against USA. You are just defending your interests, like we, Brazilians, were supposed to do more... I think USA has some characteristics that others may not mimic, and tons of good examples that are to be followed. Finally, how do you - and the americans that you know - see Brazil´s future?
And now, just my two cents about...
::: Brazil :::
- Leader: Getúlio Vargas
- Civ Characteristics: Religious (Biggest Catholic Country in the world; Lots of other religions are present, living peacefully with each other.) and Industrious (try to hack through a jungle not being industrious... Biggest hydro plant in the world - well, until our friends the Chinese finish their own... The only "developing country" present in the Space Station Project. Our first sattelite launcher is due to November, 2002 - it will make Brazil one of the eight (?) countries that dominate this technology. Brazil also already knows how to enrich uranium, with our own technology.)
-Unique Unit: EXPEDITIONARY (Brazilians)
The EXPEDITIONARY are our WWII veterans.
Prerequisite: Nationalism
Resources: None
Class: Land
Cost: 80 shields
Attack/Defense/Movement: 5/6/1
Bombard: NA
Upgrades From: Musketman
Upgrades To: Infantry
Abilities: Foot Soldier
Draft
Ranged Attack Animation
AI Strategies: Defense
Orders: Load
Airlift
Pillage
Upgrade Unit
Any comments? 
Best regards, 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Odd
|
|
São Paulo Brazil
Apr 2002 time: 02:20
|
|
I don´t know in which way were the FEB unique from other infantry in the WWII. Maybe a unique aspect of a brazilian unit would be the "Bandeirantes" and other explorers, they walked huge distances and made Brazil take it´s actual shape. But I don´t know how to put this into the game. I must confess also that I´m a bit ignorant about our military.
Since lots of civilization (e.g. Greek) weren´t united as a state, and other (like Japan and Germany) weren´t for a long time in their history, and a civilization concept is of a people with similar culture and heritage, it would suit better a latin-american civilization. Not to be polemic on what achievements we had in this short period of independence (historically speaking), but it would represent this part of the world.
As for some statements made that ex-colonies shoudn´t be civilizations, I must note that, although is strange Lincoln in 4000 B.C., anyother civilization, with the exception of the Babylonias, Egypt and India shouldn´t be included in that period (just because Greece started a long long time ago doesn´t mean they were a civ by 4000 B.C.). I must also remember that nearly all civilizations, to a certain degree, were formed upon an existing people/culture. The difference is that since the USA history is much more recent, it´s also much more clear the moment they split and formed a new culture than Rome, for exemple.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yellfromhell
|
 |
Montevideo, Uruguay
Jun 2002 time: 05:20
|
|
Hi,
Kokomo, thanks for the greeting. I concur with you about Bolivar and the anglo-saxon developers.
Craftsman, thank you too. About Uruguay and Brazil contested territories: 1) the so called "Isla Brasileira" ('Brazilean island' in english, but the name is wrong :=))) , in the Cuareim (Cuaraí) river, in front of Bella Unión (Uruguay) and Barra do Cuaraí (Brazil). I know that there is only one inhabitant in the island: a very old and crazy man that says he was sent there by the brazilean government during the 50s to defend it from the uruguayan invasion :=) . 2) A big territory near the cities of Rivera (Uruguay) and Livramento (Brazil). In that territory we always had a settlement, now a small town called "Masoller". During the 60s the brasilean government ordered to build a settlement there too. That brasilean town was built in three days. Since the 60s uruguayan and brasileans competed there installing gasoline stations (ANCAPs and Ipirangas), buying lands, etc. Anyway, Masoller is a lot more developed than the brasilean town because it has a good school (brasilean boys go to Masollers school) and houses are better in Masoller too. The last movement I know about in this problem is the claim of a Rio Grande Deputy, saying "Uruguayans are invading Rio Grande" (imagine that: our obsolete 100 tanks against your F16 and thousands of soldiers :=) ). The "Sin Tierra" movement is now near Uruguay-Brazil fronteir and they seem to be willing to settle in the contested territory. This is the last news I have about the problem. Surely one day their will not be fronteir anymore (maybe we unite, maybe you conquer us :=) ).Hugs
Odd, Im with you in the idea of having the Bandeirantes as the brasilean UU. But anglo-saxon developers sometimes lack of knowledge about developing countries: surely they would draw the Bandeirante as a black brasilean :=)
Felch X. Hi. I support what you say. Maybe in Civ4, when you reach modern era, the Persians could become IRAk, or the Russians could become the USSR, the Otomans become Turkey, etc. Or maybe we could have to deal with colonies that want their independence: the English could loose some colonies that form the USA, the Spanish could loose Latin-America, etc, etc.
Well, hugs to all of you.
Bye.
Yellfromhell
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|