 |
|  |
 |
|
Martinus Magnificus
|
 |
Nijmegen, Netherlands
Feb 2001 time: 06:21
|
|
As a person that values historical accuracy a lot, I want to add two things to this discussion:
- first, complexity. Civ 3 is a game . Making it completely historically accurate, would be impossible to achieve and it would make the game unplayable
- second, fun. Imagine a game that is completely historacally accurate. Every game would be identical, and the outcome would be exactly the same. That wouldn't be much fun, now would it? Much of the fun in playing Civ III is based upon the fact that you can change history!!!
All I'm saying is that Civ III cannot and should not be a history book.
However, where complexity and fun do not prevent it, I think a game like Civ III should be as accurate as possible from a historical point of view. This means that I can live with Hannibal as the leader of the Cartaginians (although it would be better if they named him general and his people Phoenicians), though I have serious problems with Abe Lincoln and the Americans in 4000 BC (IMO it would be more fun to have the Americans proclaim their independence at some point in the game - bring back the concept of civil wars!!). Other examples are easily given.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hoznog
|
|
quote: accordning to legends, rome was founded by two guys (romulus, remus) razed by wolves ... maybe greek wolves? |
Romulus and Remus were descendants of Aeneas. Aeneas founded a city in Southern Italy after his home city was destroyed.... by the Greeks. Aeneas was one of the defenders of Troy.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|