 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Donal Graeme
|
 |
California
Jul 2002 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Apocalypse
A lot...wars with goals, get into AI's head, maintain good relations, be economical with military. Common sense stuff. You both have it.
I want to hear about character. Work ethic. Ability to think on your feet and come up with new ideas. |
I will try to answer that as best as I can:
First, I am a lifelong Civ player who has learned the hard way that there is no single tactic that will yield victory in the long run. How does this apply to this job? Simple, because of the delicate nature of our position we will likely have to balance friendships with competing powers, and tried to avoid getting involved in their disputes. Russia and Rome are almost certainly going to mix it up, and the same will likely happen between the Aztecs and Germans, and the Persians and English. And America is of little concern at the moment. The French won't be around long enough for it to be practical to worry about them and the Greeks. We are going to play a balancing act, all the way to the end game. Because We don't want a uber-empire to emerge to the north, south or east of us at all. I have become fairly proficient at playing the AI against each other, and if elected, will use that ability to try to survive the perilous times ahead.
And Sir Ralph, While that message was almost worthless, it wasn't complete spam. That is easy enough. I don't have much reason to hurry either, because my artistic skills were never that great. So that pic will be a long time coming.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
jdd2007
|
 |
Cincinnati
Aug 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
ambassadors, you mean real people? yes, if people show interest, i will see how many qualified people would like to become ambassadors, and then appoint them. maybe 1-3 civs per person, depending on how many people apply.
i do not intend to open a FA webpage, but i might consider a list of other civs with detailed info like you made. this guide, updated maybe weekly, would be where the ambassadors would be a great help.
currently, i spend a lot of time everyday on apolyton, and some on CFC. i will continue being very active as long as im minister.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
UnOrthOdOx
|
 |
Hello....
Jun 2002 time: 22:21
|
|
I would liketo respond to Apoc. Work ethic and character. I am sorry that I do not know Donal Graeme much at this time, and hope that will change in the future.
Jdd, however, I have come to know quite well. I can tell you that he is quite devoted to this demo game. And that once he gets his mind made up, he works diligently towards his goals. He did not create the Hawks. Frankly I do not rememer who did. He did, however take over when the afore mentioned left for whatever reason. Jdd has opinions, strong ones. He will make them vocal, much like most Hawks make their voices heard, sometimes to the dismay of others, we are a bolsterous bunch. But he also listens to suggestions. The last the public at large may not know, but I assure you, he will listen, he has before, just not anything the public knows of. I voted for him not as leader of the Hawks, but because I know him, and know he would do a great job at this position, and it is a shame that he was not put in before.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Donal Graeme
|
 |
California
Jul 2002 time: 21:21
|
|
That last post made me want to cry Unortho. It was so...touching.
To try to respond to some of the questions: At this point, I think that ambassadors may not be necessary, at least in the sense of keeping track of the various differing civs. I think that rather than have one person keep track of several civs at once, there should be assistants to the FM. I would call them Deputy Foreign Ministers. They would help the FM if the workload got too large, or if he/she needed someone to check out something while he/she was busy. Managing tech trading perhaps. I believe this would be superior to having designated ambassadors, because this allows for a more fluid and responsive handling of the workload.
I understand that the biggest problem I face right now is that no one really knows me. Jdd has been here a long time, and thus has name-recognition. Apprehension at voting for the new guy is completely understandable, and I would probably do the same in everyone else's place.
Also, I never meant to insinuate that Jdd was going to be a raving warmonger, I am sure that he is completely rational. However, I just wanted to point out that the FM is rarely involved in Offensive wars, mainly as an advisor to the prez. Rather, it will be the FM who must handle aggressive neighbors effectively. Given our poor industrial base, it is neccessary that when we go to war it be on our terms, not somebody's like Bismark. I just want my fellow citizens to understand the leanings and inclinations of the two candidates. At this point, I would rather be bullied and have to accept material loss than to risk losing a war.
Lastly, I happen to be good at off-the-wall suggestions. The Deputy Minister idea being one of them(I do hope that no one else mentioned a similar idea beforehand!). As FM I would devote my full creative attention on advancing the postition of our nation above all others.
Thanks to anybody who actually read this.
edit: I should be able to participate fully until my term ends without problem.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|